Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Pancreatic Cancer (Jul 2025)
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • Sex Differences in Medicine (Sep 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact

Usage Information

Marburg virus glycoprotein mRNA vaccine is more protective than a virus-like particle-forming mRNA vaccine
Chandru Subramani, … , Andrea Carfi, Alexander Bukreyev
Chandru Subramani, … , Andrea Carfi, Alexander Bukreyev
Published July 3, 2025
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI194586.
View: Text | PDF
Research In-Press Preview Infectious disease Virology

Marburg virus glycoprotein mRNA vaccine is more protective than a virus-like particle-forming mRNA vaccine

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Although virus-like particle (VLPs) vaccines were shown to be effective against several viruses, their advantage over vaccines which include envelope protein only is not completely clear, particularly for mRNA-encoded VLPs. We conducted a side-by-side comparison of the immunogenicity and protective efficacy of mRNA vaccines encoding for the Marburg virus (MARV) full-length GP delivered alone or as a VLP. Electron microscopy confirmed VLP formation when MARV GP and matrix protein VP40 co-expressed. We vaccinated guinea pigs with a two-component mRNA vaccine encoding for GP and VP40 (VLP) or GP alone. At the highest dose, both vaccines protected fully, although the VLP vaccine elicited a slightly lower humoral response than the GP-only group. However, at low doses, GP-only mRNA conferred 100% protection, whereas the VLP exhibited only partial protection. In mice, VLP mRNA induced a moderate preference for GP-specific CD8+ T cells responses, whereas the GP-only mRNA somewhat favored CD4+ T cell responses. Guinea pig whole blood RNA-seq revealed that the VLP vaccine down-regulated genes associated with various biological and metabolic processes, including the NF-κB signaling pathway, whereas the GP-only vaccine upregulated interferon signaling. Overall, the VLP mRNA vaccine was less immunogenic and protective, whereas the GP-only mRNA vaccine conferred robust protection by as little as one µg dose in guinea pigs.

Authors

Chandru Subramani, Michelle N. Meyer, Matthew A. Hyde, Margaret E. Comeaux, Haiping Hao, James E. Crowe Jr., Vsevolod L. Popov, Harshwardhan Thaker, Sunny Himansu, Andrea Carfi, Alexander Bukreyev

×

Usage data is cumulative from July 2025 through July 2025.

Usage JCI PMC
Text version 640 0
PDF 132 0
Supplemental data 166 0
Citation downloads 35 0
Totals 973 0
Total Views 973

Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.

Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.

Advertisement

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts