Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Alerts
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Author's Takes
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Immune Environment in Glioblastoma (Upcoming)
    • Korsmeyer Award 25th Anniversary Collection (Jan 2023)
    • Aging (Jul 2022)
    • Next-Generation Sequencing in Medicine (Jun 2022)
    • New Therapeutic Targets in Cardiovascular Diseases (Mar 2022)
    • Immunometabolism (Jan 2022)
    • Circadian Rhythm (Oct 2021)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Commentaries
    • Research letters
    • Letters to the editor
    • Editorials
    • Viewpoint
    • Top read articles
  • Clinical Medicine
  • JCI This Month
    • Current issue
    • Past issues

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Author's Takes
  • In-Press Preview
  • Commentaries
  • Research letters
  • Letters to the editor
  • Editorials
  • Viewpoint
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Alerts
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Subscribe
  • Contact

COVID-19s

  • 88 Articles
  • 0 Posts
  • ← Previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • …
  • 8
  • 9
  • Next →
Impact of pre-existing chronic viral infection and reactivation on the development of long COVID
Michael J. Peluso, … , Peter W. Hunt, Timothy J. Henrich
Michael J. Peluso, … , Peter W. Hunt, Timothy J. Henrich
Published December 1, 2022
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI163669.
View: Text | PDF

Impact of pre-existing chronic viral infection and reactivation on the development of long COVID

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

BACKGROUND. The presence and reactivation of chronic viral infections such as Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), cytomegalovirus (CMV) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) have been proposed as potential contributors to Long COVID (LC), but studies in well-characterized post-acute cohorts of individuals with COVID-19 over a longer time course consistent with current case definitions of LC are limited. METHODS. In a cohort of 280 adults with prior SARS-CoV-2 infection, we assessed the presence and types of LC symptoms and prior medical history (including COVID-19 history and HIV status), and performed serological testing for EBV and CMV using a commercial laboratory. We used covariate-adjusted binary logistic regression models to identify independent associations between variables and LC symptoms. RESULTS. We observed that LC symptoms such as fatigue and neurocognitive dysfunction at a median of 4months following initial diagnosis were independently associated with serological evidence suggesting recent EBV reactivation (early antigen-D [EA-D] IgG positivity) or high nuclear antigen (EBNA) IgG levels, but not with ongoing EBV viremia. Serological evidence suggesting recent EBV reactivation (EA-D IgG) was most strongly associated with fatigue (OR 2.12). Underlying HIV infection was also independently associated with neurocognitive LC (OR 2.5). Interestingly, participants who had serologic evidence of prior CMV infection were less likely to develop neurocognitive LC (OR 0.52). CONCLUSION. Overall, these findings suggest differential effects of chronic viral co-infections on the likelihood of developing LC and predicted distinct syndromic patterns. Further assessment during the acute phase of COVID-19 is warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION. Long-term Impact of Infection with Novel Coronavirus (LIINC); NCT04362150 FUNDING. This work was supported by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases NIH/NIAID 3R01AI141003-03S1 to TJ Henrich, R01AI158013 to M Gandhi and M Spinelli, K24AI145806 to P Hunt, and by the Zuckerberg San Francisco Hospital Department of Medicine and Division of HIV, Infectious Diseases, and Global Medicine. MJP is supported on K23 A137522 and received support from the UCSFBay Area Center for AIDS Research (P30-AI027763).

Authors

Michael J. Peluso, Tyler-Marie Deveau, Sadie E. Munter, Dylan M. Ryder, Amanda M. Buck, Gabriele Beck-Engeser, Fay Chan, Scott Lu, Sarah A. Goldberg, Rebecca Hoh, Viva Tai, Leonel Torres, Nikita S. Iyer, Monika Deswal, Lynn H. Ngo, Melissa Buitrago, Antonio E. Rodriguez, Jessica Y. Chen, Brandon C. Yee, Ahmed Chenna, John W. Winslow, Christos J. Petropoulos, Amelia N. Deitchman, Joanna Hellmuth, Matthew A. Spinelli, Matthew S. Durstenfeld, Priscilla Y. Hsue, John Daniel Kelly, Jeffrey N. Martin, Steven G. Deeks, Peter W. Hunt, Timothy J. Henrich

×

One-year follow-up of the CAPSID randomized trial for high-dose convalescent plasma in severe COVID-19 patients
Sixten Körper, … , Erhard Seifried, Hubert Schrezenmeier
Sixten Körper, … , Erhard Seifried, Hubert Schrezenmeier
Published November 3, 2022
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI163657.
View: Text | PDF

One-year follow-up of the CAPSID randomized trial for high-dose convalescent plasma in severe COVID-19 patients

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

BACKGROUND. Results of many randomized trials on COVID-19 convalescent plasma (CCP) have been reported but information on long-term outcome after CCP treatment is limited. The objectives of this extended observation of the randomized CAPSID trial are to assess long-term outcome and disease burden in patients initially treated with or without CCP. METHODS. Of 105 randomized patients, 50 participated in the extended observation. Quality of life (QoL) was assessed by questionnaires and a structured interview. CCP-donors (n=113) with asymptomatic to moderate COVID-19 were included as a reference group.RESULTS. The median follow-up of patients was 396 days, the estimated 1-year survival was 78.7% in the CCP and 60.2% in the control group (p=0.08). The subgroup treated with a higher cumulative amount of neutralizing antibodies showed a better 1-year survival compared to the control group (91.5% versus 60.2%; p=0.01). Medical events and QoL assessments showed a consistent trend for better results in the CCP group without reaching statistical significance. There was no difference in the increase of neutralizing antibodies after vaccination between CCP and the control group. CONCLUSION. The trial demonstrated a trend towards better outcome in the CCP group without reaching statistical significance. A pre-defined subgroup analysis showed a significant better outcome (long-term survival; time to discharge from ICU and time to hospital discharge) among those who received a higher amount of neutralizing antibodies compared to the control group. A substantial long-term disease burden remains after severe COVID-19. TRIAL REGISTRATION. EudraCT number 2020-001310-38 FUNDING. Bundesministerium für Gesundheit (German Federal Ministry of Health): ZMVI1-2520COR802/ZMI1-2521COR802

Authors

Sixten Körper, Beate Grüner, Daniel Zickler, Thomas Wiesmann, Patrick Wuchter, Rainer Blasczyk, Kai Zacharowski, Peter Spieth, Torsten Tonn, Peter Rosenberger, Gregor Paul, Jan Pilch, Joachim Schwäble, Tamam Bakchoul, Thomas Thiele, Julian Knoerlein, Matthias M. Dollinger, Joerg Krebs, Martin Bentz, Victor M. Corman, Dzenan Kilalic, Gerlinde Schmidtke-Schrezenmeier, Philipp M. Lepper, Lucas Ernst, Hinnerk Wulf, Alexandra Ulrich, Manfred Weiss, Jan Kruse, Thomas Burkhardt, Rebecca Müller, Harald Klüter, Michael Schmidt, Bernd Jahrsdörfer, Ramin Lotfi, Markus Rojewski, Thomas Appl, Benjamin Mayer, Philipp Schnecko, Erhard Seifried, Hubert Schrezenmeier

×

The Notch1/CD22 signaling axis disrupts Treg cell function in SARS-CoV2-associated multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children
Mehdi Benamar, … , Lauren A. Henderson, Talal A. Chatila
Mehdi Benamar, … , Lauren A. Henderson, Talal A. Chatila
Published October 25, 2022
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI163235.
View: Text | PDF

The Notch1/CD22 signaling axis disrupts Treg cell function in SARS-CoV2-associated multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) evolves in some pediatric patients following acute infection with SARS-CoV-2 by hitherto unknown mechanisms. Whereas acute-COVID-19 severity and outcome were previously correlated with Notch4 expression on regulatory T (Treg) cells, here we show that the Treg cells in MIS-C are destabilized through a Notch1-dependent mechanism. Genetic analysis revealed that MIS-C patients were enriched in rare deleterious variants impacting inflammation and autoimmunity pathways, including dominant-negative mutations in the Notch1 regulators NUMB and NUMBL leading to Notch1 upregulation. Notch1 signaling in Treg cells induced CD22, leading to their destabilization in a mTORC1-dependent manner and to the promotion of systemic inflammation. These results establish a Notch1-CD22 signaling axis that disrupts Treg cell function in MIS-C and point to distinct immune checkpoints controlled by individual Treg cell Notch receptors that shape the inflammatory outcome in SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Authors

Mehdi Benamar, Qian Chen, Janet Chou, Amélie M. Julé, Rafik Boudra, Paola Contini, Elena Crestani, Peggy S. Lai, Muyun Wang, Jason Fong, Shira Rockwitz, Pui Y. Lee, Tsz Man Fion Chan, Ekin Zeynep Altun, Eda Kepenekli, Elif Karakoc-Aydiner, Ahmet Ozen, Perran Boran, Fatih Aygun, Pınar Önal, Ayse Ayzit Kilinc Sakalli, Haluk Cokugras, Metin Yusuf Gelmez, Fatma B. Oktelik, Esin Cetin Aktas, Yuelin Zhong, Maria L. Taylor, Katherine Irby, Natasha B. Halasa, Elizabeth H. Mack, Sara Signa, Ignazia Prigione, Marco Gattorno, Nicola Cotugno, Donato Amodio, Raif S. Geha, Mary Beth Son, Jane W. Newburger, Pankaj B. Agrawal, Stefano Volpi, Paolo Palma, Ayca Kiykim, Adrienne Randolph, Gunnur Deniz, Safa Baris, Raffaele De Palma, Klaus Schmitz-Abe, Louis-Marie Charbonnier, Lauren A. Henderson, Talal A. Chatila

×

Trained immunity is induced in humans after immunization with an adenoviral vector COVID-19 vaccine
Dearbhla M. Murphy, … , Joseph Keane, Sharee A. Basdeo
Dearbhla M. Murphy, … , Joseph Keane, Sharee A. Basdeo
Published October 25, 2022
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI162581.
View: Text | PDF

Trained immunity is induced in humans after immunization with an adenoviral vector COVID-19 vaccine

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

BACKGROUND. Heterologous effects of vaccines are mediated by ‘trained immunity’ whereby myeloid cells are metabolically and epigenetically reprogrammed resulting in heightened responses to subsequent insults. Adenovirus vaccine vector has been reported to induce trained immunity in mice. Therefore, we sought to determine if the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine (AZD1222), which uses an adenoviral vector, could induce trained immunity in vivo in humans. METHODS. Ten healthy volunteers donated blood on the day before receiving the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine and on day 14, 56 and 90 post vaccination. Monocytes were purified from PBMC; cell phenotype was determined by flow cytometry, expression of metabolic enzymes were quantified by RT-qPCR and production of cytokines and chemokine in response to stimulation ex vivo were analyzed by multiplex ELISA. RESULTS. Monocyte frequency and count were increased in peripheral blood up to 3 months post vaccination compared with their own pre-vaccine control. Expression of HLA-DR, CD40 and CD80 was enhanced on monocytes for up to 3 months following vaccination. Moreover, monocytes had increased expression of glycolysis-associated enzymes 2 months post vaccination. Upon stimulation ex vivo with unrelated antigens, monocytes produced increased IL-1β, IL-6, IL-10, CXCL1, and MIP-1α, and decreased TNF, compared with pre-vaccine controls. Resting monocytes produced more IFN-γ, IL-18, and MCP-1 up to 3 months post vaccination compared with pre-vaccine controls. CONCLUSION. These data provide evidence for the induction of trained immunity following a single dose of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine. FUNDING. This work was funded by The Health Research Board (EIA-2019-010) and Science Foundation Ireland Strategic Partnership Programme (Proposal ID 20/SPP/3685).

Authors

Dearbhla M. Murphy, Donal J. Cox, Sarah A. Connolly, Eamon P Breen, Aenea A.I. Brugman, James J. Phelan, Joseph Keane, Sharee A. Basdeo

×

Rapalogs downmodulate intrinsic immunity and promote cell entry of SARS-CoV-2
Guoli Shi, … , Jacob S. Yount, Alex A. Compton
Guoli Shi, … , Jacob S. Yount, Alex A. Compton
Published October 20, 2022
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI160766.
View: Text | PDF

Rapalogs downmodulate intrinsic immunity and promote cell entry of SARS-CoV-2

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

SARS-CoV-2 infection in immunocompromised individuals is associated with prolonged virus shedding and evolution of viral variants. Rapamycin and its analogs (rapalogs, including everolimus, temsirolimus, and ridaforolimus) are FDA-approved as mTOR inhibitors for the treatment of human diseases, including cancer and autoimmunity. Rapalog use is commonly associated with increased susceptibility to infection, which has been traditionally explained by impaired adaptive immunity. Here, we show that exposure to rapalogs increases susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection in tissue culture and in immunologically naive rodents by antagonizing the cell-intrinsic immune response. By identifying one rapalog (ridaforolimus) that is less potent in this regard, we demonstrate that rapalogs promote Spike-mediated entry into cells by triggering the degradation of antiviral proteins IFITM2 and IFITM3 via an endolysosomal remodeling program called microautophagy. Rapalogs that increase virus entry inhibit the mTOR-mediated phosphorylation of the transcription factor TFEB, which facilitates its nuclear translocation and triggers microautophagy. In rodent models of infection, injection of rapamycin prior to and after virus exposure resulted in elevated SARS-CoV-2 replication and exacerbated viral disease, while ridaforolimus had milder effects. Overall, our findings indicate that preexisting use of certain rapalogs may elevate host susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection and disease by activating lysosome-mediated suppression of intrinsic immunity.

Authors

Guoli Shi, Abhilash I. Chiramel, Tiansheng Li, Kin Kui Lai, Adam D. Kenney, Ashley Zani, Adrian C Eddy, Saliha Majdoul, Lizhi Zhang, Tirhas Dempsey, Paul A. Beare, Swagata Kar, Jonathan W. Yewdell, Sonja M Best, Jacob S. Yount, Alex A. Compton

×

Neutralizing antibody responses in patients hospitalized with SARS-CoV-2 Delta or Omicron infection
Susanne L. Linderman, … , Wesley H. Self, Rafi Ahmed
Susanne L. Linderman, … , Wesley H. Self, Rafi Ahmed
Published October 18, 2022
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI164303.
View: Text | PDF

Neutralizing antibody responses in patients hospitalized with SARS-CoV-2 Delta or Omicron infection

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Authors

Susanne L. Linderman, Lilin Lai, Estefany L. Bocangel Gamarra, Max S.Y. Lau, Srilatha Edupuganti, Diya Surie, Mark W. Tenforde, James D. Chappell, Nicholas M. Mohr, Kevin W. Gibbs, Jay S. Steingrub, Matthew C. Exline, Nathan I. Shapiro, Anne E. Frosch, Nida Qadir, Meredith E. Davis-Gardner, M. Juliana McElrath, Adam S. Lauring, Mehul S. Suthar, Manish M. Patel, Wesley H. Self, Rafi Ahmed

×

Improved control of SARS-CoV-2 by treatment with nucleocapsid-specific monoclonal antibody
Tanushree Dangi, … , Justin M. Richner, Pablo Penaloza-MacMaster
Tanushree Dangi, … , Justin M. Richner, Pablo Penaloza-MacMaster
Published October 11, 2022
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI162282.
View: Text | PDF

Improved control of SARS-CoV-2 by treatment with nucleocapsid-specific monoclonal antibody

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

The SARS-CoV-2 spike protein is the main antigen in all approved COVID-19 vaccines and is also the only target for monoclonal antibody therapies. Immune responses to other viral antigens are generated after SARS-CoV-2 infection, but their contribution to the antiviral response remains unclear. Here, we interrogate whether nucleocapsid-specific antibodies can improve protection against SARSCoV-2. We first immunized mice with a nucleocapsid-based vaccine, and then transferred sera from these mice into naïve mice, followed by challenge with SARS-CoV-2. We show that mice that received nucleocapsid-specific sera or a nucleocapsid-specific monoclonal antibody (mAb) exhibited enhanced control of SARS-CoV-2. Nucleocapsid-specific antibodies elicited NK-mediated antibodydependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) against infected cells. These findings provide the first demonstration in the coronavirus literature that antibody responses specific to the nucleocapsid protein can improve viral clearance, providing a rationale for the clinical evaluation of nucleocapsid-based monoclonal antibody therapies to treat COVID-19.

Authors

Tanushree Dangi, Sarah Sanchez, Jacob Class, Michelle C. Richner, Lavanya Visvabharathy, Young Rock Chung, Kirsten Bentley, Richard J. Stanton, Igor J. Koralnik, Justin M. Richner, Pablo Penaloza-MacMaster

×

Durability of protection and immunogenicity of AZD1222 (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19) COVID-19 vaccine over 6 months
Magdalena E. Sobieszczyk, … , and Ian Hirsch, on behalf of the AstraZeneca AZD1222 Clinical Study Group
Magdalena E. Sobieszczyk, … , and Ian Hirsch, on behalf of the AstraZeneca AZD1222 Clinical Study Group
Published September 15, 2022
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 2022;132(18):e160565. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI160565.
View: Text | PDF

Durability of protection and immunogenicity of AZD1222 (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19) COVID-19 vaccine over 6 months

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Background We report updated safety, efficacy, and immunogenicity of AZD1222 (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19) from an ongoing phase 3 trial.Methods Adults at increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection were randomized (2:1), stratified by age, to receive 2 doses of AZD1222 or placebo. The primary efficacy end point was confirmed SARS-CoV-2 reverse-transcriptase PCR–positive (RT-PCR–positive) symptomatic COVID-19 at 15 or more days after a second dose in baseline SARS-CoV-2–seronegative participants. The 21,634 and 10,816 participants were randomized to AZD1222 and placebo, respectively.Findings Data cutoff for this analysis was July 30, 2021; median follow-up from second dose was 78 and 71 days for the double-blind period (censoring at unblinding or nonstudy COVID-19 vaccination) and 201 and 82 days for the period to nonstudy COVID-19 vaccination (regardless of unblinding) in the AZD1222 and placebo groups, respectively. For the primary efficacy end point in the double-blind period (141 and 184 events; incidence rates: 39.2 and 118.8 per 1,000 person years), vaccine efficacy was 67.0% (P < 0.001). In the period to nonstudy COVID-19 vaccination, incidence of events remained consistently low and stable through 6 months in the AZD1222 group; for the primary efficacy end point (328 and 219 events; incidence rates: 36.4, 108.4) and severe/critical disease (5 and 13 events; incidence rates: 0.6, 6.4), respective vaccine efficacy estimates were 65.1% and 92.1%. AZD1222 elicited humoral immune responses over time, with waning at day 180. No emergent safety issues were seen.Conclusion AZD1222 is safe and well tolerated, demonstrating durable protection and immunogenicity with median follow-up (AZD1222 group) of 6 months.Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04516746.Funding AstraZeneca; US government.

Authors

Magdalena E. Sobieszczyk, Jill Maaske, Ann R. Falsey, Stephanie Sproule, Merlin L. Robb, Robert W. Frenck Jr., Hong-Van Tieu, Kenneth H. Mayer, Lawrence Corey, Kathleen M. Neuzil, Tina Tong, Margaret Brewinski Isaacs, Holly Janes, Himanshu Bansal, Lindsay M. Edwards, Justin A. Green, Elizabeth J. Kelly, Kathryn Shoemaker, Therese Takas, Tom White, Prakash Bhuyan, Tonya Villafana, and Ian Hirsch, on behalf of the AstraZeneca AZD1222 Clinical Study Group

×

Frequent detection but lack of infectivity of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in pre-symptomatic, infected blood donor plasma
Paula Saá, … , Rachael P. Jackman, Philip J. Norris
Paula Saá, … , Rachael P. Jackman, Philip J. Norris
Published July 14, 2022
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI159876.
View: Text | PDF

Frequent detection but lack of infectivity of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in pre-symptomatic, infected blood donor plasma

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Respiratory viruses such as influenza do not typically cause viremia; however, SARS-CoV-2 has been detected in the blood of COVID-19 patients with mild and severe symptoms. Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in blood raises questions about its role in pathogenesis as well as transfusion safety concerns. Blood donor reports of symptoms or a diagnosis of COVID-19 after donation (post-donation information, PDI) preceded or coincided with increased general population COVID-19 mortality. Plasma samples from 2,250 blood donors who reported possible COVID-19 related PDI were tested for the presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA. Detection of RNAemia peaked at 9-15% of PDI donors in late 2020 to early 2021 and fell to ~4% after implementation of widespread vaccination in the population. RNAemic donors were 1.2 to 1.4-fold more likely to report cough or shortness of breath and 1.8-fold more likely to report change in taste or smell compared to infected donors without detectable RNAemia. No infectious virus was detected in plasma from RNAemic donors; inoculation onto permissive cell lines showed <0.7-7 plaque forming units (PFU)/mL and into susceptible mice <100 PFU/mL in RNA positive plasma based on limits of detection in these models. These findings suggest that blood transfusions are highly unlikely to transmit SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Authors

Paula Saá, Rebecca V. Fink, Sonia Bakkour, Jing Jin, Graham Simmons, Marcus O. Muench, Hina Dawar, Clara Di Germanio, Alvin J. Hui, David J. Wright, David E. Krysztof, Steven H. Kleinman, Angela Cheung, Theresa Nester, Debra A. Kessler, Rebecca L. Townsend, Bryan R. Spencer, Hany Kamel, Jacquelyn M. Vannoy, Honey Dave, Michael P. Busch, Susan L. Stramer, Mars Stone, Rachael P. Jackman, Philip J. Norris

×

Favorable vaccine-induced SARS-CoV-2 specific T cell response profile in patients undergoing immune-modifying therapies
Martin Qui, … , Antonio Bertoletti, Ennaliza Salazar
Martin Qui, … , Antonio Bertoletti, Ennaliza Salazar
Published May 10, 2022
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI159500.
View: Text | PDF

Favorable vaccine-induced SARS-CoV-2 specific T cell response profile in patients undergoing immune-modifying therapies

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

BACKGROUND. Patients undergoing immune-modifying therapies demonstrate a reduced humoral response after COVID-19 vaccination, but we lack a proper evaluation of the impact of such therapies on vaccine-induced T cell responses. METHODS. We longitudinally characterized humoral and Spike-specific T cell responses in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients who are on antimetabolite therapy (azathioprine or methotrexate), TNF inhibitors and/or other biologic treatment (anti-integrin or anti-p40) for up to 6 months after completing two-dose COVID-19 mRNA vaccination. RESULTS. We demonstrated that a Spike-specific T cell response is not only induced in treated IBD patients at levels similar to healthy individuals, but also sustained at higher magnitude for up to 6 months after vaccination, particularly in those treated with TNF inhibitor therapy. Furthermore, the Spike-specific T cell response in these patients is mainly preserved against mutations present in SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.529 (Omicron) and characterized by a Th1/IL-10 cytokine profile. CONCLUSION. Despite the humoral response defects, patients under immune-modifying therapies demonstrated a favorable profile of vaccine-induced T cell responses that might still provide a layer of COVID-19 protection. FUNDING. This study was funded by the National Centre for Infectious Diseases NCID Catalyst Grant (FY2021ES) and the National Research Fund Competitive Research Programme (NRF-CRP25-2020-0003). The funders played no role in the design, conduct, or reporting of this study.

Authors

Martin Qui, Nina Le Bert, Webber Pak Wo Chan, Malcolm Tan, Shou Kit Hang, Smrithi Hariharaputran, Jean Xiang Ying Sim, Jenny Guek Hong Low, Weiling Ng, Wei Yee Wan, Tiing Leong Ang, Antonio Bertoletti, Ennaliza Salazar

×
  • ← Previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • …
  • 8
  • 9
  • Next →

No posts were found with this tag.

Advertisement

Copyright © 2023 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts