Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Pancreatic Cancer (Jul 2025)
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • Sex Differences in Medicine (Sep 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Marburg virus glycoprotein mRNA vaccine is more protective than a virus-like particle-forming mRNA vaccine
Chandru Subramani, … , Andrea Carfi, Alexander Bukreyev
Chandru Subramani, … , Andrea Carfi, Alexander Bukreyev
Published July 3, 2025
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 2025;135(17):e194586. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI194586.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Infectious disease Virology

Marburg virus glycoprotein mRNA vaccine is more protective than a virus-like particle-forming mRNA vaccine

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Although virus-like particle (VLP) vaccines were shown to be effective against several viruses, their advantage over vaccines that include envelope protein only is not completely clear, particularly for mRNA-encoded VLPs. We conducted a side-by-side comparison of the immunogenicity and protective efficacy of mRNA vaccines encoding the Marburg virus (MARV) full-length glycoprotein (GP) delivered alone or as a VLP. Electron microscopy confirmed VLP formation when MARV GP and matrix protein VP40 were coexpressed. We vaccinated guinea pigs with a 2-component mRNA vaccine encoding GP and VP40 (VLP) or GP alone. At the highest dose, both vaccines protected fully, although the VLP vaccine elicited a slightly lower humoral response than did the GP-only mRNA vaccine. However, at low doses, GP-only mRNA conferred 100% protection, whereas the VLP vaccine conferred only partial protection. In mice, VLP mRNA induced a moderate preference for GP-specific CD8+ T cell responses, whereas the GP-only mRNA somewhat favored CD4+ T cell responses. Guinea pig whole-blood RNA-Seq revealed that the VLP vaccine downregulated genes associated with various biological and metabolic processes, including the NF-κB signaling pathway, whereas the GP-only vaccine upregulated IFN signaling. Overall, the VLP mRNA vaccine was less immunogenic and protective, whereas the GP-only mRNA vaccine conferred robust protection with a dose of as little as 1 μg in guinea pigs.

Authors

Chandru Subramani, Michelle Meyer, Matthew A. Hyde, Margaret E. Comeaux, Haiping Hao, James E. Crowe Jr., Vsevolod L. Popov, Harshwardhan Thaker, Sunny Himansu, Andrea Carfi, Alexander Bukreyev

×

Figure 7

Assessment of MARV GP and VLP mRNA vaccines in guinea pig study 2: protective efficacy.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Assessment of MARV GP and VLP mRNA vaccines in guinea pig study 2: prote...
(A) Guinea pig survival curve. (B and C) Percentage of body weight change. (D) Disease score. (E) Viremia. (F–H) Viral load in the spleen, liver, and kidneys, respectively. Data are represented as individual values (A–E) and the median and IQR (F–H). The log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test was used to analyze the survival data. Statistical significance was calculated by 2-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple-comparison test (B) and the Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunn’s multiple-comparison test (F–H). #Same P value for all vaccinated groups versus the PBS control; otherwise, the specific P values are indicated.

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts