Usage Information
Abstract
Anaphylaxis is a life-threatening hypersensitivity reaction. Clinical observations suggest heightened susceptibility during viral infections, yet the mechanisms remain poorly defined. Here, we show that both active and passive IgG-mediated anaphylaxis were exacerbated in the setting of acute viral infection. In mice, this enhancement was driven predominantly by FcγRIV, the homolog of human FcγRIIIa. FcγRIV crosslinking induced anaphylactic symptoms selectively in infected animals, with no effect in naive conditions. Among leukocytes, inflammatory monocytes emerged as the principal drivers of this lethal reaction. Viral infection triggered a strong upregulation of FcγRIV on inflammatory monocytes, an effect absent in type I IFN receptor–deficient (Ifnar1-deficient) mice. Extending these findings, we observed increased frequencies of CD16-expressing classical monocytes in patients with acute COVID-19, and murine SARS-CoV-2 infection recapitulated this phenotype. Mechanistically, FcγRIV crosslinking during infection promoted the production of platelet-activating factor, the key mediator of mortality, in a type I IFN–dependent (IFN-I–dependent) manner. Together, these findings indicate that viral infection creates an immune milieu that heightens monocyte sensitivity to Fcγ receptor engagement, positioning these cells as major effectors of IgG-mediated hypersensitivity in the infected host. They further suggest that Fc receptor pathway modulation merits further investigation in contexts with heightened IFN-I responses, such as in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Authors
Abdelrahman Elwy, Hossam Abdelrahman, Julia Specht, Gina M. Ewert, Justa Friebus-Kardash, Swati Dhiman, Julia Falkenstein, Theresa Charlotte Christ, Elisa Wiebeck, Arzoo Shamoon, Nils B. Leimkühler, Thomas Gramberg, Alina Russ, Ulrich Kalinke, Fei Kuang, Kathrin Sutter, Manfred Kopf, Matthias Mack, Wiebke Hansen, Falk Nimmerjahn, Karl S. Lang
Usage data is cumulative from February 2026 through May 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 1,864 | 64 |
| 482 | 15 | |
| Figure | 926 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 211 | 2 |
| Citation downloads | 112 | 0 |
| Totals | 3,595 | 81 |
| Total Views | 3,676 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)