Laboratory of Signal Transduction, Sloan-Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, New York 10021, USA.
Phone: (212) 639-7558; Fax: (212) 794-4342; E-mail: email@example.com.
Published July 1, 2002 - More info
Membrane lipids of the sphingolipid class contain a long-chain sphingoid base backbone (such as sphingosine), an amide-linked, long-chain fatty acid, and one of various polar head groups. The structure of these head groups defines the various sphingolipid subtypes, with a hydroxyl group found in ceramide, phosphorylcholine in sphingomyelin (SM), and carbohydrates in glycosphingolipids (Figure 1 and not shown). Because SM is concentrated in the outer leaflet of the plasma membrane and provides a barrier to the extracellular environment (1), it was long assumed to serve only structural roles. However, in 1987 our laboratory reported for the first time rapid sphingomyelinase (SMase) activation in response to 1,2-diacylglycerols but not phorbol esters (2), and proposed the existence of an SM-based signaling pathway (3, 4). Subsequently, Hannun and coworkers showed that this pathway can be activated by receptor-mediated mechanisms (5) and provided evidence that ceramide is a second messenger (6). Indeed, sphingolipid metabolism has proved to be a dynamic process, and sphingolipid metabolites — including ceramide, sphingosine, and sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) — are now recognized as messengers playing essential roles in cell growth, survival, and death (7, 8).
Schematic representation of sphingolipid intermediary metabolism.
Figure 1 shows that ceramide can be formed through SMase-dependent catabolism of SM, as well as by de novo synthesis. SMases — specialized enzymes with phospholipase C activity — hydrolyze the phosphodiester bond of SM. Several isoforms of SMase can be distinguished by their different pH optima, and some but not all of these molecules have been identified at the molecular level. Neutral SMase (NSMase) and acid SMase (ASMase) are rapidly activated by diverse stress stimuli and promote an increase in cellular ceramide levels over a period of minutes to hours (7, 8). Alkaline SMase activity is found in the intestinal mucosa and bile and does not appear to participate in signal transduction.
ASMase was originally considered a strictly lysosomal enzyme because of its pH optimum at 4.5–5.0. However, an ASMase isoform was recently shown to localize to secretory vesicles near the plasma membrane (9) by a mechanism involving carbohydrate remodeling and to be secreted extracellularly (10–12). Liu and Anderson have observed the plasma membrane form of ASMase in caveolae, microdomains enriched in SM, and they have shown that IL-1β stimulates its activity in this compartment (12). Because pH and other factors regulate the on-off rate of substrate, rather than the catalytic activity of the enzyme (11), SM associated with LDL particles can be hydrolyzed by ASMase even at the neutral pH found at the cell surface and in caveolae.
NSMases (pH optimum 7.4) are only now being defined at the molecular level (7), but it is clear from the residual activity seen in ASMase knockout mice that one or more distinct genes must encode such enzymes (13). NSMase activity is inhibitable by glutathione and is therefore derepressed under conditions of oxidative stress, when glutathione is depleted (14). Agents such as TNF-α, which induce this state, lead to prolonged ceramide generation (14). FFAs may also enhance NSMase activity (15), and conditions that increase FFA levels, such as might occur in the gastrointestinal tract upon treatment with cyclooxygenase inhibitors, increase NSMase activity (16).
De novo ceramide biosynthesis requires coordinate action of serine palmitoyl transferase and ceramide synthase to generate ceramide. This process begins with the condensation of serine and palmitoyl-CoA to form 3-ketosphinganine (7, 8), which is reduced to the sphingoid base sphinganine and acylated by ceramide synthase to generate dihydroceramide. This compound is oxidized to ceramide by converting sphinganine to sphingosine by introduction of a trans-4,5 double bond. Alternately, this pathway may re-utilize the sphingosine released by sequential degradation of more complex sphingolipids for ceramide synthesis. This pathway can be stimulated by drugs and ionizing radiation and usually results in a prolonged ceramide elevation (17, 18).
Once generated, ceramide may amass or may be converted into a variety of metabolites (Figure 1). Phosphorylation by ceramide kinase (7, 8) generates ceramide 1-phosphate (not shown), while deacylation by either neutral or acid ceramidase — the products of different genes (19) — yields sphingosine, which may be phosphorylated by sphingosine kinase to S1P. Two distinct sphingosine kinases have been cloned. These two isoforms differ in temporal patterns of appearance during development, are expressed in different tissues, and possess distinct kinetic properties (20, 21), implying that they perform different cellular functions.
Ceramide may also be converted back to SM by transfer of phosphorylcholine from phosphatidylcholine to ceramide via SM synthase (7, 8). Alternatively, it can be glycosylated by glucosylceramide synthase to form glucosylceramide (not shown), which may be further modified by various enzymes in the Golgi apparatus to form complex glycosphingolipids.
While ceramide has been proposed as a messenger for events as diverse as differentiation, senescence, proliferation, and cell cycle arrest, a larger body of research has focused on its role in apoptosis (7, 8). Evidence supporting ceramide as a message for apoptosis induction is based on data from many cell systems and comes from several kinds of studies. First, agonist- and stress-induced increases in ceramide levels precede biochemical and morphologic manifestations of apoptosis in many systems. Second, increasing cellular ceramide by addition of natural ceramide, exogenous SMase, or pharmacologic agents that interfere with enzymes of ceramide metabolism mimics effects of stress on apoptosis induction. Third, genetic models, including Niemann-Pick Disease cells, Asmase–/– mice, and Glucosylceramide synthase–/– mice, manifest the predicted abnormalities in stress responses from the biochemical and cell biologic studies. In view of the fact that other sphingolipid metabolites (except perhaps sphingoid bases and GD3 in selected cells) are not cytotoxic (7, 8), it thus appears that ceramide per se is necessary and likely sufficient for some forms of cell stress–associated apoptosis. Interestingly, ceramide may serve as a stress response signal even in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, as yeast mutants incapable of rapid de novo synthesis of this sphingolipid class fail to adapt and to regrow at elevated temperatures, and instead undergo growth arrest. This defect is bypassed by exogenous sphingolipid, indicating an obligate requirement for sphingolipids for this response. Thus, ceramide/sphingolipid signaling may constitute a programmed stress response that predates apoptosis evolutionarily.
One proposal that may help explain how ceramide serves these diverse functions is that of the “S1P Rheostat” (22). Spiegel and coworkers based this proposal on the observation that ceramide and its metabolite S1P often have opposing effects on biologic outcome. While ceramide is often antiproliferative and proapoptotic, S1P has been implicated as a second messenger in cellular proliferation and survival (23), and in protection against ceramide-mediated apoptosis (22). Thus, it has been suggested that the balance between these two sphingolipid messages may be an important factor determining survival or death of mammalian cells (23). As sphingosine levels in mammalian cells are often one to two orders of magnitude lower than those of ceramide, the generation of substantial amounts of S1P requires additional sphingosine production. Typically, S1P is produced by the coordinate activation of SMase to generate ceramide, ceramidase to free up sphingosine, and sphingosine kinase (24). In fact, activation of ceramidase may be so robust in some cells that the ceramide levels never rise substantially, indicating that SM has been converted stoichiometrically to sphingosine. For this reason, activation of the SM pathway can never be ruled out by the failure to detect ceramide increases, unless measurements of SM, sphingosine, and S1P levels are also available.
The recent discovery of a set of cell surface S1P receptors, the EDG proteins, has further complicated the interpretation of S1P dynamics (24). It is not yet clear to what extent S1P functions by ligating these receptors, rather than by acting as an intracellular signal. The available data suggest that, by either mode, it antagonizes ceramide-mediated biologic responses. Other metabolic pathways may also contribute to the diverse action of ceramide in different cellular systems. In general, the ceramide backbone of sphingolipids is generated in the endoplasmic reticulum, and the head groups are added in the Golgi apparatus, after which the newly synthesized lipids are shuttled to various organelles. Sphingolipid-degrading enzymes, conversely, have usually been thought to localize to the endosomal-lysosomal system, but recent studies have detected isoforms of both the synthetic and the degradative enzymes in alternative compartments, where they appear to play distinctive roles. A mitochondrial form of ceramide synthase, for instance, is exclusively activated by ionizing radiation treatment of HeLa cells and appears requisite for efficient mitochondrial commitment to the apoptotic process (R. Kolesnick, unpublished results). Likewise, both ASMase and SM synthase are targeted in part to the plasma membrane, with the former specifically targeted to membrane rafts (see below). One form of acid ceramidase may also be a secreted enzyme, while a form of neutral ceramidase may be mitochondrial (25) and hence might affect ceramide synthase–mediated ceramide signaling in that compartment.
In the last few years, a number of groups have generated ceramide in model membrane systems and described properties that fundamentally alter our understanding of how this lipid might act as a second messenger. Two properties, the ability to spontaneously form microdomains and the ability to act as a fusagen, seem particularly relevant to ceramide action (for review see ref. 26).
The interaction of sphingolipids, especially SM and cholesterol, drives the formation of plasma membrane rafts (also known as glycosphingolipid-enriched microdomains [GEMs] or detergent-insoluble glycosphingolipid-enriched microdomains [DIGs]). These rafts, formed in the Golgi apparatus, are targeted to the plasma membrane, where they are thought to exist as floating islands within the sea of bulk membrane. Although there is substantial disagreement as to their content, these rafts are considered in most reports to comprise 3500 lipid molecules and about 30 proteins (27). As much as 70% of all cellular SM may be found in rafts (28). A general consensus has developed over the last few years that plasma membrane rafts represent signaling microdomains. Rafts containing the caveolin proteins manifest a unique flask-shaped structure by electron microscopy and may possess different properties than do rafts lacking caveolin.
Numerous studies now show that SM hydrolysis to ceramide, usually via ASMase, occurs within rafts (12, 29–31). Recent work with a new anti-ceramide IgM supports this contention (R. Kolesnick and E. Gulbins, unpublished results). Ceramide generated within rafts appears to alter raft structure in a manner consistent with the known physical properties of ceramide. Thus, patches of rafts enriched in ceramide become visible within seconds after translocation of ASMase onto the outer leaflet of the plasma membrane upon Fas activation of Jurkat cells and primary cultures of hepatocytes. These microdomains rapidly fuse into larger domains, termed “platforms,” and form caps on the cell surface (Figure 2). The functional significance of this reorganization of membrane structure would appear to allow for protein oligomerization. Indeed, preformed Fas trimers (32) localize to these domains and appear to form higher-order structures, allowing for the oligomerization of the downstream adaptors FADD/MORT-1 and caspase-8. (While Peter and coworkers arrived at a different conclusion [ref. 33], subsequent studies appear to corroborate the original observation [refs. 34, 35]). This key step, which, at least in some systems, is necessary for transmembrane transmission of the Fas apoptotic signal, is suppressed under basal conditions because only the ligated Fas that activates ASMase appears capable of entering the membrane platforms.
A model for Fas-induced capping through ASMase activation. Ligation of preformed Fas trimers on a target cell by transmembrane Fas ligand (FasL) activates small amounts of caspase-8 within the cytoplasm of that cell, which is nonetheless sufficient to induce ASMase translocation into membrane rafts. The consequent hydrolysis of SM to ceramide, which self-associates, initiates coalescence of ceramide-enriched rafts into larger patches (isolated ovals) and platforms (aggregated ovals). Only ligated Fas can enter and concentrate within these platforms, permitting oligomerization of the downstream Fas effectors FADD and caspase-8 (not shown), the constituents of the death-inducing signaling complex (DISC). The extent to which this raft reorganization system is used for Fas signaling is currently unknown. Fas may not be the only cell surface receptor to employ this concentrating system, as a recent study suggests that CD40 may also cap in ceramide-rich platforms (61). Note that the transmembrane domains of some, and the cytoplasmic domain of all, Fas molecules are not depicted in this schematic for reasons of clarity. Similarly, the FasL-presenting cell is only shown once (upper left). PM, plasma membrane.
Other receptors, such as E-selectin and β-integrin, that cap in T cells but do not activate this raft reorganization system signal via ceramide-independent mechanisms. Whether environmental stresses similarly use this ceramide-dependent raft system for transmembrane signaling is currently unknown. Further, it is not certain whether modes of ceramide generation other than via ASMase can signal raft reorganization, or whether ceramide generated in other membranes serves oligomerizing function. Clearly additional work is necessary to explore this remarkable mode of cellular activation.
Ceramide directly regulates ceramide-activated protein phosphatases (CAPPs) (36), a ceramide-activated protein kinase (identical to kinase suppressor of Ras [KSR]) (37, 38), phospholipase A2 (39), cathepsin D (40), various protein kinase C (PKC) isoforms (41), and c-Raf-1 (42, 43). Both PP1 and PP2a are CAPPS that are conserved through yeast, which, in response to ceramide elevation, induce growth arrest or apoptosis, depending on the cellular context. Although the exact substrates are uncertain, evidence points to PKB/AKT1 (44), Bcl-2 (45), and SR proteins (36) as targets. KSR is a Ser/Thr kinase that phosphorylates c-Raf-1 to initiate signaling through the mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade in response to ceramide elevation, TNF-α, or epidermal growth factor, depending on cell type (for alternate view see ref. 46). ASMase-released ceramide binds directly to PLA2 and cathepsin D (39, 40). Binding of ceramide to cathepsin D in endosomes or in vitro triggers autocatalytic cleavage of cathepsin to its active form. A link between cathepsin D and apoptosis was originally defined by Kimchi and coworkers (47), who showed that cells transfected with antisense cathepsin D mRNA survive exposure to apoptotic stimuli. Thus, cathepsin D links ceramide to at least one form of apoptosis induction. The physiologic role of ceramide in PLA2 activation remains uncertain.
A recent study by Saito et al. may explain how ceramide regulates the activity of some of its substrates (48). By mutagenesis and deletion analysis of PKCδ and ε, these investigators showed that the conserved region (C1) — and particularly the cysteine loop region C1B — is the site of ceramide activation. Interestingly, numerous other proteins, including such known ceramide-responsive factors as KSR and c-Raf-1, contain C1B domains. Whether the C1B domain targets ceramide-activated proteins to sites of ceramide generation, such as plasma membrane rafts, is presently unknown.
Over the past few years there has been an escalating interest in exploring the role of ceramide and its metabolites in tissue physiology and pathophysiology. Levels of ceramide and S1P can be manipulated by various drugs, which are now being examined in clinical and preclinical studies. Knowledge of the cell type–specific activation of sphingolipid-dependent signaling pathways, derived from a large body of biochemical, genetic, and physiological studies, provides a strong impetus for this work.
Typically, strategies that elevate cellular ceramide are being used for therapies aimed to arrest growth or promote apoptosis. Conversely, agents that reduce ceramide or elevate S1P tend to attenuate apoptosis and promote proliferation. One dramatic demonstration of the first approach is seen in the work of Kester and coworkers, who found that ceramide analogs, applied directly to damaged arteries, can be strongly antiproliferative (49). Neointimal hyperplasia of vascular smooth muscle cells and secondary occlusion of coronary arteries, the cause of restenosis after balloon angioplasty or stenting, affects nearly 20% of the 1.5 million patients who undergo coronary angioplasty yearly. Proliferation of cultured vascular smooth muscle cells appears to involve the extracellular signal–regulated kinase (ERK) and AKT kinase cascades and to be inhibited by ceramide (50). In vivo, C6-ceramide–coated balloon catheters prevent stretch-induced neointimal hyperplasia in rabbit carotid arteries (49) by inactivating ERK and AKT signaling and thereby inducing cell cycle arrest in stretch-injured vascular smooth muscle cells (50) (Figure 3).
C6-ceramide limited neointimal hyperplasia after balloon angioplasty in rabbit carotid arteries. (a–c) Hematoxylin and eosin–stained sections from excised arteries 2 weeks after angioplasty. (a) Sham-treated control artery. (b) Artery treated with a balloon coated with DMSO/ethanol (1:1, vol/vol) displays marked neointimal hyperplasia. (c) Artery treated with a C6-ceramide–coated balloon displays minimal neointimal hyperplasia. Bar, 200 μm. Reprinted with permission (49).
Manipulation of ceramide levels may also enhance the effectiveness of some cancer therapies. Wanebo and coworkers showed that the addition of ceramide enhances taxol-mediated apoptotic death of Tu138 head and neck tumor cells (51). Preliminary data using Tu138 xenografts in nude mice showed synergistic reduction in tumor growth upon combined treatment (personal communication, H. Wanebo). Clavien and colleagues have shown that the cellular content of ceramide in human colon cancer is reduced by more than 50% relative to that of healthy colon mucosa (52). The potent ceramidase inhibitor B13 increases the ceramide content of tumor cells and induces tumor cell apoptosis, without affecting the ceramide level or survival of normal liver cells. B13 also prevents growth of two aggressive human colon cancer cell lines metastatic to the liver. Together, these findings suggest that ceramidase inhibition offers a promising therapeutic strategy for selective toxicity toward malignant but not toward normal cells.
Blocking ceramide generation may also protect some tissues from side effects of cancer therapy. The lethal gastrointestinal syndrome, which limits the efficacy of radiation and chemotherapy (53), apparently results from apoptotic damage to the endothelial cells of the microvasculature of the small intestine, and, indirectly, from crypt stem cell dysfunction and tissue necrosis (54). Genetic inactivation of Asmase prevents this toxicity, as does treatment with the endothelial cell survival factor bFGF, which acts in part by suppressing ASMase activity. These studies suggest a potential approach to protecting the gut and increasing the therapeutic ratio.
Evidence from in vivo models demonstrates that pharmacologic manipulation of S1P may also be accomplished with therapeutic benefit. Tilly and coworkers showed that female Asmase–/– mice are defective in the normal apoptotic deletion of fetal oocytes, leading to neonatal ovarian hyperplasia (55). Ex vivo, Asmase–/– oocytes and S1P-treated wild-type oocytes resist developmental and anticancer drug–induced apoptosis, confirming cell autonomy of the death defect. Moreover, in adult wild-type female mice, radiation-induced oocyte loss, the event that drives premature ovarian failure and infertility in female cancer patients, is completely prevented by injection of S1P into the ovary prior to irradiation. In ongoing mating trials, the pregnancy rates are 15% and 75% in female mice irradiated without and with prior in vivo ovarian S1P pretreatment, respectively (R. Kolesnick and J. Tilly, unpublished results). Critically, this preservation of fertility is accomplished without propagating genetic damage in offspring of the S1P-protected irradiated females. Thus, S1P may represent the first agent capable of protecting against the premature ovarian failure and infertility that are routine side effects observed in young girls and reproductive-age women treated for cancer.
Blockade of S1P biosynthesis provides another possible means to amplify ceramide-mediated death signals. Fenretinide (4-HPR), a synthetic retinoid that is cytotoxic for a variety of tumor cell lines in vitro, has recently been reported to induce sustained ceramide increases via the de novo pathway in cell lines of neuroblastoma and other cancer types, including leukemias (56, 57). Combining fenretinide with putative modulators of ceramide metabolism — such as glucosylceramide synthase inhibitors, which prevent the siphoning off of ceramide for glycosphingolipid synthesis, or safingol (L-threo-dihydrosphingosine), a sphingosine kinase inhibitor that prevents formation of S1P from degraded ceramide — synergistically increases cytotoxicity in cell lines from various tumors, including those with altered p53 status and high alkylator resistance. Significantly, ceramide is only minimally increased in normal fibroblasts or blood mononuclear cells under similar conditions, and the toxicity to normal fibroblasts and myeloid progenitors from bone marrow appears to be slight (56). Clinically, it is likely that obtaining levels of fenretinide in tumors sufficient to achieve optimal ceramide generation will require intravenous delivery. Such formulations of fenretinide and safingol are currently being developed with support from the National Cancer Institute RAID program, and clinical trials are planned (56).
Previously published data likewise suggest that safingol may be useful in the clinic. Schwartz and coworkers administered this drug to patients with advanced cancer in a phase I clinical trial (58), either alone or in combination with doxorubicin, which is known to elevate ceramide in numerous transformed cell types. With a fixed dose of doxorubicin (45 mg/m2), safingol could be escalated to micromolar doses without dose-limiting toxicity and without altering the pharmacokinetics of doxorubicin. Encouraging clinical activity was observed in patients with pancreatic cancer and sarcoma.
Finally, Mandala et al. (59) have found that FTY720, a potent immunosuppressant that protects solid organ allografts in a number of experimental models through altered lymphocyte trafficking, is activated by phosphorylation to become a structural analog of S1P. Both S1P and phosphorylated FTY720 display similar affinity for and activation of S1P receptors. FTY720 has already passed through preclinical testing into clinical trials in renal transplant patients, in whom early data suggest that the drug is well tolerated and has a favorable toxicity profile (60). Thus lysophosphosphingolipids and their analogs may represent a promising new class of therapeutics for transplantation and autoimmune disorders.
An intrinsic function of the SM pathway is to respond to stress signals, whether environmental or pharmacologic, converting them into biochemical messages. Thus, by its very nature, it would appear that this mechanism is poised for therapeutic manipulation. Of particular interest is the observation in several systems that transformed cell types are hypersensitive to the effects of ceramide perturbation, suggesting that strategies to kill tumor cells by increasing their ceramide content or blocking S1P accumulation should have a favorable therapeutic index. The generality of this finding must still be tested in studies of many more normal and transformed cell types. Whether the differences observed in drug responses relate to alterations in tumoral sphingolipid handling, cell cycle regulation, or signal transduction remains an open question.
As evidenced by the recent paper of Mandala et al. in Science (59), the era of sphingolipid therapy seems near at hand (59). Successful modulation of this pathway in vivo depends on understanding cell type–specific responses to these messages in live tissue. For instance, the discovery that deletion of Asmase abrogates the normal developmental program of apoptosis in the oocyte has led to the promising discovery that S1P might prevent sterility after exposure to cancer therapies. Now that the sphingolipid analog FTY720 has been identified as a legitimate pharmacologic agent for human patients, we can anticipate additional therapeutic success from the judicious use of sphingolipid derivatives, building on continuing preclinical studies with these agents.
The author would like to thank Gary Schwartz, C. Patrick Reynolds, Barry Maurer, Mark Kester, Harold Wanebo, James Ferrara, and Zvi Fuks for their consultation during preparation of this manuscript. The author is supported by NIH grants RO1 CA-42385 and CA-85704.