Gut microbiota–derived trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO) plays a role in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease, but its role in the pathogenesis of atrial fibrillation (AF) remains uncertain. TMAO levels were quantified in plasma from serial subjects undergoing elective cardiac catheterizations and shown to independently associate with prevalent AF following adjustment for risk factors. Human cAMP response element modulator isoform IbΔC-X transgenic mice (CREM-IbΔC-X) supplemented with a TMAO diet developed AF sooner. C57BL/6J mice on and off a TMAO diet had more inducible AF via a transesophageal pacing study compared with chow-fed controls. Dietary choline supplementation increased circulating TMAO levels and significantly accelerated AF onset in CREM-IbΔC-X mice. Iodomethylcholine (IMC) reduced circulating TMAO levels and choline-induced AF onset. Cecal metagenomic analyses showed that choline supplementation induced changes in microbial communities associated with AF, while many of these changes were attenuated by IMC. Choline supplementation promoted overall adverse atrial remodeling with left atrial dilation. Optical mapping studies showed that mice supplemented with choline exhibited reduced conduction velocity, shortened action potential duration at 80% repolarization, and decreased wavelength. TMAO inhibited muscarinic receptor 2, resulting in autonomic dysfunction that promotes AF. In summary, TMAO, independently associated with AF risk in subjects, enhanced AF in multiple mouse models via autonomic dysfunction and is a therapeutic target for preventing AF.
Selvam Arjunan, Isaiah Pemberton, Xinmin S. Li, Naseer Sangwan, Lydia Akino, Emmanuel Opoku, Dmitriy Verbovetskiy, Ina Nemet, Hyun Su Kim, Haruko Masumiya, Zeneng Wang, Joseph A. Lupica, Melissa Y. Tian, Karis Mao, Deepthi P. Mallela, Maradumane L. Mohan, Sarah M. Schumacher, Julie H. Rennison, Sathyamangla V. Naga Prasad, Kenneth R. Laurita, Vamsi Chodisetty, Mina K. Chung, David R. Van Wagoner, John Barnard, Jonathan D. Smith, Oussama Wazni, Stanley L. Hazen, Robert A. Koeth
Usage data is cumulative from July 2026 through October 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 8,784 | 60 |
| 1,549 | 29 | |
| Figure | 993 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 738 | 18 |
| Citation downloads | 417 | 0 |
| Totals | 12,481 | 107 |
| Total Views | 12,588 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.