Circulating insulin immunoreactivity (IRI) in type I diabetic patients (insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus [IDDM]) includes a covalent aggregate about twice the size of insulin. These studies were designed to determine the source and conditions promoting the accumulation of this material. Among 31 IDDMs, the aggregate made up 28 +/- 3.6% of the mean fasting plasma IRI. Five of these patients were restudied after 5 d of treatment with equidose intravenous insulin. The relative amount of the aggregate during subcutaneous treatment (40 +/- 8.0%) was indistinguishable (P greater than 0.7) from that at the termination of intravenous treatment (41 +/- 6.8%). To determine whether previous exposure to therapeutic insulin influenced the appearance and accumulation of the aggregate, we intravenously or subcutaneously infused insulin for 5 h in nine healthy volunteers (euglycemic clamp). At the termination of the high-dose intravenous infusion (10 mU X kg-1 X min-1), the concentration of the aggregate was 81 +/- 18 microU/ml, and it accounted for 2.9% of total IRI. At the conclusion of the other infusion protocols, the absolute amounts of aggregate were somewhat less, but they accounted for similar percentages. On polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, the circulating aggregate was indistinguishable from a material of similar molecular weight contaminating commercial insulin. We conclude that the insulin aggregate found in the blood of IDDMs originates in commercial insulin. Its appearance is independent of the route of insulin administration. Prolonged and continuous use of insulin may increase its concentration but is not necessary for its appearance. The potential biologic and immunologic consequences of the aggregate are important matters that need to be addressed.
M Maislos, P M Mead, D H Gaynor, D C Robbins
Usage data is cumulative from May 2023 through May 2024.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 64 | 0 |
15 | 19 | |
Scanned page | 24 | 0 |
Totals | 103 | 19 |
Total Views | 122 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.