Sphingosine-1-phosphate lyase insufficiency syndrome (SPLIS) is a rare condition causing nephrotic syndrome, neuropathy, and other manifestations. SPLIS is caused by mutations in SGPL1, which encodes sphingosine-1-phosphate lyase (SPL), a pyridoxal 5′-phosphate (PLP)-dependent enzyme needed to degrade the bioactive sphingolipid sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P). Supplementation with the PLP precursor pyridoxine benefits some individuals with PLP-dependent enzymopathies. We investigated whether pyridoxine has therapeutic activity in SPLIS. Neurological improvement, plasma S1P normalization, and increased SPL activity in patient-derived fibroblasts were observed after pyridoxine supplementation in a patient with R222Q-variant SPLIS. Additionally, PLP dose-dependently augmented recombinant R222Q-variant SPL activity. To further explore pyridoxine’s effects, gene editing was employed to create an R222Q-variant SPLIS mouse model. SPLR222Q mice fed pyridoxine-enriched chow lacked obvious phenotypes. However, SPL inactivation, S1P accumulation, proteinuria, and glomerulosclerosis developed in SPLR222Q but not WT mice fed chow with reduced pyridoxine. Ultrastructural analysis and super-resolution microscopy showed podocyte loss and foot process effacement. Transcriptional profiling revealed patterns of cytokine upregulation and extracellular matrix remodeling. Inhibiting S1P production or RhoA/ROCK signaling prevented nephrosis in SPLR222Q mice fed chow lacking pyridoxine. Our findings establish a SPLIS mouse model that recapitulates R222Q-variant SPLIS, demonstrates its responsiveness to pyridoxine, and implicates a S1P/RhoA/ROCK pathway in its pathophysiology. Running Title: Cofactor supplementation in R222Q-variant SPLIS
Ranjha Khan, Maria L. Allende, Ehtesham Khalid, Joanna Y. Lee, Everett Stone, Max Rodnick-Smith, Audrey Izuhara, Vadym Buncha, Georgina Gyarmati, Janos Peti-Peterdi, Ranya Al-Khaledy, Jeffrey B. Hodgin, Gizachew Tassew, Babak Oskouian, Alina Chen, Yu-Tang Chang, Rachel Zhang, Richard L. Proia, Julie D. Saba
The Editorial Board will only consider comments that are deemed relevant and of interest to readers. The Journal will not post data that have not been subjected to peer review; or a comment that is essentially a reiteration of another comment.