Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Journal stats
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • ASCI Milestone Awards
    • Video Abstracts
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • The cGAS-STING pathway: DNA sensing in health and disease (Jun 2026)
    • Neurodegeneration (Mar 2026)
    • Clinical innovation and scientific progress in GLP-1 medicine (Nov 2025)
    • Pancreatic Cancer (Jul 2025)
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • ASCI Milestone Awards
  • Video Abstracts
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Journal stats
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Hijacking a key chromatin modulator creates epigenetic vulnerability for MYC-driven cancer
Zhenhua Yang, Kushani Shah, Theodore Busby, Keith Giles, Alireza Khodadadi-Jamayran, Wei Li, Hao Jiang
Zhenhua Yang, Kushani Shah, Theodore Busby, Keith Giles, Alireza Khodadadi-Jamayran, Wei Li, Hao Jiang
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Hematology Oncology

Hijacking a key chromatin modulator creates epigenetic vulnerability for MYC-driven cancer

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

While the genomic binding of MYC protein correlates with active epigenetic marks on chromatin, it remains largely unclear how major epigenetic mechanisms functionally impact the tumorigenic potential of MYC. Here, we show that, compared with the catalytic subunits, the core subunits, including DPY30, of the major H3K4 methyltransferase complexes were frequently amplified in human cancers and selectively upregulated in Burkitt lymphoma. We show that DPY30 promoted the expression of endogenous MYC and was also functionally important for efficient binding of MYC to its genomic targets by regulating chromatin accessibility. Dpy30 heterozygosity did not affect normal animal physiology including lifespan, but significantly suppressed Myc-driven lymphomagenesis, as cells failed to combat oncogene-triggered apoptosis as a result of insufficient epigenetic modulation and expression of a subset of antiapoptotic genes. Dpy30 reduction also greatly impeded MYC-dependent cellular transformation, without affecting normal cell growth. These results suggest that MYC hijacks a major epigenetic pathway — H3K4 methylation — to facilitate its molecular activity in target binding and to coordinate its oncogenic program for efficient tumorigenesis, meanwhile creating “epigenetic vulnerability.” DPY30 and the H3K4 methylation pathway are thus potential epigenetic targets for treating certain MYC-driven cancers.

Authors

Zhenhua Yang, Kushani Shah, Theodore Busby, Keith Giles, Alireza Khodadadi-Jamayran, Wei Li, Hao Jiang

×

Figure 7

Impact of Dpy30 heterozygosity on gene expression in splenic B cells.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Impact of Dpy30 heterozygosity on gene expression in splenic B cells.
Al...
All data are from purified splenic B220+ cells. (A) Total RNA levels per cell. n = 8 WT, n = 1 Dpy30+/–, n = 9 Eμ-Myc, and n = 11 Eμ-Myc Dpy30+/–. (B and E) Relative mRNA levels of the indicated genes were determined by qPCR and normalized to Actb, shown as the mean + SD. n = 6, 6, 8, and 6 mice (for Dpy30 and Myc in B, and Bcl2, Bcl-xL, and Birc5 in E); n = 5, 4, 9, and 9 mice (for Max in B and Mt1 in E); and n = 3, 3, 5, 3 mice (for Xiap and Mcl1 in E) for WT, Dpy30+/–, Eμ-Myc, and Eμ-Myc Dpy30+/– genotypes, respectively. (C) Immunoblot for the indicated proteins (or modification), with increasing loading doses of lysates. Graph shows the relative signal intensity, which was calculated as the ratio over β-actin and plotted from 3 Eμ-Myc or 4 Eμ-Myc Dpy30+/– samples at a single loading dose. (D) GSEA for the Myc-bound gene sets comparing gene expression profiles for Eμ-Myc and Eμ-Myc Dpy30+/– B cells. Myc targets that are most significantly upregulated (Myc-bound UP) or downregulated (Myc-bound DN) by Myc (curated from GEO GSE51011; see Methods and Supplemental Table 4) were used as gene sets, respectively. NES, normalized enrichment score. (F) Relative Dpy30 enrichment at the indicated gene TSSs was determined by Dpy30 ChIP on purified B220+ cells, calculated from the ratio of the percentage of input value for each locus over that for the negative control site (Olfr725) in Eμ-Myc samples from 3 mice of each genotype. Data represent the mean + SD. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001, by Student’s t test (C) and 1-factor ANOVA with a post hoc t test (A, B, E and F).

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts