Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Alerts
  • Advertising/recruitment
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • By specialty
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Author's Takes
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews...
    • Mechanisms Underlying the Metabolic Syndrome (Oct 2019)
    • Reparative Immunology (Jul 2019)
    • Allergy (Apr 2019)
    • Biology of familial cancer predisposition syndromes (Feb 2019)
    • Mitochondrial dysfunction in disease (Aug 2018)
    • Lipid mediators of disease (Jul 2018)
    • Cellular senescence in human disease (Apr 2018)
    • View all review series...
  • Collections
    • Recently published
    • In-Press Preview
    • Commentaries
    • Concise Communication
    • Editorials
    • Viewpoint
    • Scientific Show Stoppers
    • Top read articles
  • Clinical Medicine
  • JCI This Month
    • Current issue
    • Past issues

  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Author's Takes
  • Recently published
  • Brief Reports
  • Technical Advances
  • Commentaries
  • Editorials
  • Hindsight
  • Review series
  • Reviews
  • The Attending Physician
  • First Author Perspectives
  • Scientific Show Stoppers
  • Top read articles
  • Concise Communication
A homing mechanism for bone marrow–derived progenitor cell recruitment to the neovasculature
Hui Jin, … , Martin Friedlander, Judy Varner
Hui Jin, … , Martin Friedlander, Judy Varner
Published March 1, 2006
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 2006;116(3):652-662. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI24751.
View: Text | PDF
Categories: Research Article Stem cells

A homing mechanism for bone marrow–derived progenitor cell recruitment to the neovasculature

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

CD34+ bone marrow–derived progenitor cells contribute to tissue repair by differentiating into endothelial cells, vascular smooth muscle cells, hematopoietic cells, and possibly other cell types. However, the mechanisms by which circulating progenitor cells home to remodeling tissues remain unclear. Here we show that integrin α4β1 (VLA-4) promotes the homing of circulating progenitor cells to the α4β1 ligands VCAM and cellular fibronectin, which are expressed on actively remodeling neovasculature. Progenitor cells, which express integrin α4β1, homed to sites of active tumor neovascularization but not to normal nonimmune tissues. Antagonists of integrin α4β1, but not other integrins, blocked the adhesion of these cells to endothelia in vitro and in vivo as well as their homing to neovasculature and outgrowth into differentiated cell types. These studies describe an adhesion event that facilitates the homing of progenitor cells to the neovasculature.

Authors

Hui Jin, Aparna Aiyer, Jingmei Su, Per Borgstrom, Dwayne Stupack, Martin Friedlander, Judy Varner

×

Figure 5

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Integrin expression and function in murine bone marrow–derived progenito...
Integrin expression and function in murine bone marrow–derived progenitor cells. (A) FACs profiles for integrins α4β1, α5β1, αv, and β2 on murine bone marrow–derived Lin+, Lin– progenitor cells and Lin–Sca1+ stem cells. The small numbers in the corners of each FACS profile indicate the percentage of positive cells. (B–E) Adhesion of murine bone marrow–derived Lin+ and Lin– progenitor cells and Lin–Sca1+ stem cells to endothelial cell monolayers in the presence of medium, and function blocking antibodies against integrins α4β1, α5β1, αv, β2, and rsVCAM. (B) Micrographs showing EGFP Lin– green fluorescent cells adhering to ECs in the presence of medium, anti-α4β1, anti-α5β1, anti-αv, or anti-β2 (BD Biosciences — Pharmingen). (C) Average number of Lin– cells adhering per ×200 microscopic field ± SEM. *P < 0.016. (D) Average number of Lin–Sca1+ cells adhering per ×200 microscopic field ± SEM. **P < 0.015. (E) Average number of Lin+ cells adhering per ×200 microscopic field ± SEM. †P < 0.0065.
Follow JCI:
Copyright © 2019 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts