Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Alerts
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Author's Takes
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Immune Environment in Glioblastoma (Feb 2023)
    • Korsmeyer Award 25th Anniversary Collection (Jan 2023)
    • Aging (Jul 2022)
    • Next-Generation Sequencing in Medicine (Jun 2022)
    • New Therapeutic Targets in Cardiovascular Diseases (Mar 2022)
    • Immunometabolism (Jan 2022)
    • Circadian Rhythm (Oct 2021)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Commentaries
    • Research letters
    • Letters to the editor
    • Editor's notes
    • Editorials
    • Viewpoint
    • Top read articles
  • Clinical Medicine
  • JCI This Month
    • Current issue
    • Past issues

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Author's Takes
  • In-Press Preview
  • Commentaries
  • Research letters
  • Letters to the editor
  • Editorials
  • Viewpoint
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Alerts
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Developmental control of CD8+ T cell–avidity maturation in autoimmune diabetes
Bingye Han, … , Teresa P. DiLorenzo, Pere Santamaria
Bingye Han, … , Teresa P. DiLorenzo, Pere Santamaria
Published July 1, 2005
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 2005;115(7):1879-1887. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI24219.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Autoimmunity

Developmental control of CD8+ T cell–avidity maturation in autoimmune diabetes

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

The progression of immune responses is generally associated with an increase in the overall avidity of antigen-specific T cell populations for peptide-MHC. This is thought to result from preferential expansion of high-avidity clonotypes at the expense of their low-avidity counterparts. Since T cell antigen-receptor genes do not mutate, it is puzzling that high-avidity clonotypes do not predominate from the outset. Here we provide a developmental basis for this phenomenon in the context of autoimmunity. We have carried out comprehensive studies of the diabetogenic CD8+ T cell population that targets residues 206–214 of the β cell antigen islet-specific glucose-6-phosphatase catalytic subunit–related protein (IGRP206–214) and undergoes avidity maturation as disease progresses. We find that the succession of IGRP206–214–specific clonotypes with increasing avidities during the progression of islet inflammation to overt diabetes in nonobese diabetic mice is fueled by autoimmune inflammation but opposed by systemic tolerance. As expected, naive high-avidity IGRP206–214–specific T cells respond more efficiently to antigen and are significantly more diabetogenic than their intermediate- or low-avidity counterparts. However, central and peripheral tolerance selectively limit the contribution of these high-avidity T cells to the earliest stages of disease without abrogating their ability to progressively accumulate in inflamed islets and kill β cells. These results illustrate the way in which incomplete deletion of autoreactive T cell populations of relatively high avidity can contribute to the development of pathogenic autoimmunity in the periphery.

Authors

Bingye Han, Pau Serra, Jun Yamanouchi, Abdelaziz Amrani, John F. Elliott, Peter Dickie, Teresa P. DiLorenzo, Pere Santamaria

×

Figure 3

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Avidity and diabetogenic potential of peripheral IGRP206–214 tetramer+ c...
Avidity and diabetogenic potential of peripheral IGRP206–214 tetramer+ cells from 17.6α/8.3β-Tg versus 17.4α/8.3β-Tg animals. (A) Tetramer-binding ability of 17.6α/8.3β versus 17.4α/8.3β CTL lines (generated by stimulation of naive splenic CD8+ cells with NRP-V7 in the presence of rIL-2). (B) Cytolytic activity of in vitro–differentiated CTL lines against NRP-V7 peptide-pulsed RMA-S/Kd targets (percentages of 51-Cr release against targets pulsed with the negative control peptide TUM were subtracted). Since Tg CD8+ T cells from both types of mice do not expand (or survive) when stimulated with irrelevant peptides, these assays reflect differences in cytolytic activity between CD8+ cells of identical antigenic specificity but different avidity. (C) Secretion of IFN-γ by purified CD8+ splenocytes (adjusted for the number of IGRP206–214 tetramer–positive cells) to various concentrations of NRP-V7 (donor mice were > 6 weeks old). (D) Cumulative incidence of diabetes in 8 (17.6α/8.3β-Tg) versus 214 (17.4α/8.3β-Tg) female mice for the period of time the former were followed.

Copyright © 2023 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts