Advances in antigen discovery and autoantibody profiling have reshaped the classification of autoimmune kidney diseases, moving beyond purely histologic definitions. The identification of podocyte-targeting autoantibodies has transformed the understanding of nephrotic syndrome, prompting renewed interest in autoimmune mechanisms underlying podocytopathies. Recent reports of nephrin autoantibodies in minimal change disease, the most common cause of nephrotic syndrome in children, suggested a potential antigen-defined subset, but findings have been inconsistent. In this issue of the JCI, Pecoraro and colleagues advance the field by systematically interrogating anti-nephrin antibodies across a diverse nephrotic syndrome cohort using human-based and orthogonal approaches. Their results highlight critical limitations in assay specificity and cohort heterogeneity while raising the question of the clinical utility of anti-nephrin antibodies in the care of patients with minimal change disease. More broadly, this study underscores the need for collaboration to establish standardized assays and rigorously phenotyped cohorts.
Dhruti P. Chen, Ronald J. Falk
Usage data is cumulative from July 2026 through July 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 1,672 | 0 |
| 365 | 0 | |
| Citation downloads | 82 | 0 |
| Totals | 2,119 | 0 |
| Total Views | 2,119 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.