BACKGROUND. Supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) and Wolff-Parkinson-White (WPW) are potentially highly symptomatic and, rarely, lethal arrhythmias associated with atrioventricular accessory pathways. While the etiology of accessory pathways remains largely unknown, they are frequently observed with Ebstein’s Anomaly, a congenital heart disease associated with maternal medicinal lithium use. Therefore, we evaluated whether in utero exposure to lithium from environmental sources is associated with the prevalence of accessory pathways. METHODS. We conducted a county-level ecological comparison of lithium levels in drinking water versus prevalence of WPW diagnoses among patients < 18-years-old in California using multivariable logistic regression. Children were analyzed given their high likelihood to reside in the same county during fetal development. WPW cases were identified using diagnostic codes. Positive and negative controls, including falsification endpoints, were analyzed. RESULTS. Among 2,329,090 patients (mean age 8.2 ± 5.9 years, 47.8% female), 686 (0.03%) were diagnosed with WPW. Areas where lithium levels ≥ 75th percentile were associated with 71% greater odds of WPW (OR 1.71, 95% CI 1.44 to 2.03). Areas above the lithium health-based screening limit had 29% greater odds of WPW (OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.58). Similar results existed in a New York statewide cohort. In validation analyses, areas where lithium levels ≥ 75th percentile were associated with a higher prevalence of SVT, syncope, palpitations, and catheter ablation procedures. CONCLUSIONS. Higher lithium levels in drinking water were associated with a greater prevalence of childhood-diagnosed WPW, implicating a potentially modifiable risk factor for the development of accessory pathways.
Justin T. Teraoka, Anushree Agarwal, Janet J. Tang, Thomas A. Dewland, Gregory M. Marcus
Usage data is cumulative from October 2026 through October 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Totals | 0 | 0 |
| Total Views | 0 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.