Despite enormous advances in clinical genomics, idiopathic scoliosis remains an enigmatic condition with poorly understood genetic and pathophysiological underpinnings impeding molecular diagnosis and the development of targeted treatments. We performed linkage analysis, exome, genome and short- and long-read RNA sequencing in a multigenerational family affected by autosomal dominant early-onset scoliosis (EOS) with a unique pattern of spondylodysplastic elements and progressive endplate erosion and identified the LRR binding FLII interacting protein 1 gene (LRRFIP1) as the disease-causing gene. The underlying cause is a rare noncoding variant altering transcription factor binding of NR3C1 (glucocorticoid receptor) leading to changes in LRRFIP1-isoform expression. Transcriptomic changes in fibroblasts of affected individuals indicated a combination of disturbed Wnt-signaling during somitogenesis, planar cell polarity signaling and postnatal inflammatory dysregulation with clinical and molecular overlaps with Ankylosing Spondylitis and Scheuermann kyphosis. We conducted a rare variant enrichment analysis using genome data from 484,903 UK Biobank participants and found an enrichment of rare risk-increasing LRRFIP1-variants in individuals with scoliosis. Our analysis of an Lrrfip1tm1.1(KOMP)Wtsi KO mouse model showed increased prevalence of idiopathic kyphoscoliosis in Lrrfip1-deficient mice. Our work provides insights into the pathophysiology of rare and common spinal disorders and hints to potential future therapeutic approaches with selective NR3C1-inhibitors.
Tanja Frey, Elena M. Cabello, Gabriele Siegel, Carla Bello, Rike Schiller, Martina A. Trippel, Neguin Ranjbar, Paranchai Boonsawat, Stephanie E. van Gijn, Ivan Ivanovski, Michael Papik, Markus Zweier, Kan Min, Katharina Steindl, Anita Rauch
Usage data is cumulative from September 2026 through October 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 307 | 0 |
| 149 | 0 | |
| Supplemental data | 115 | 0 |
| Citation downloads | 63 | 0 |
| Totals | 634 | 0 |
| Total Views | 634 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.