Lineage plasticity underscores the resilience of cancer cells in the context of drug treatment. However, lineage fates can also be therapeutically directed. We demonstrate that the eukaryotic initiation factor 4E (eIF4E) cap-binding domain is a critical regulator of lineage plasticity in prostate cancer. Using a first-in-class cap-binding domain inhibitor, we found that plasticity is driven by translational repression of basal keratins through a shared cis-regulatory element enciphered in their 5' untranslated regions (UTRs). Simultaneously this stabilized the androgen receptor (AR) through translational upregulation of the deubiquitinases BAP1 and OTUD3. This lineage program is essential for cell survival and drives a druggable vulnerability. Notably, tumors resistant to AR blockade regained sensitivity upon eIF4E cap-binding domain inhibition, which reprogrammed them toward a luminal state. In castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) patients, elevated eIF4E expression was associated with a basal phenotype, reduced luminal differentiation and accelerated resistance to AR pathway inhibitors (ARPIs). These discoveries uncover a role for the eIF4E cap-binding domain in lineage plasticity and highlight that targeting this domain offers a promising strategy to overcome treatment resistance in prostate cancer.
Rashmi Mishra, Sihyeon Song, Dhruv Choradia, Dmytro Rudoy, Cynthia L. Wladyka, Patrick Hoang, Jin Yeong Kim, Ilsa M. Coleman, Sonali Arora, Stephanie Dobersch, Alexander E. Orellana, ChenWei Lin, Philip R. Gafken, Eva Corey, Peter S. Nelson, Sita Kugel, Haolong Li, Arnab Sengupta, Andrew C. Hsieh
Usage data is cumulative from April 2026 through May 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 966 | 0 |
| 376 | 0 | |
| Supplemental data | 363 | 0 |
| Citation downloads | 61 | 0 |
| Totals | 1,766 | 0 |
| Total Views | 1,766 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.