GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP1RAs) effectively reduce feeding to treat obesity, although nausea and other aversive side effects of these drugs can limit their use. Brainstem circuits that promote satiation and mediate the physiological control of body weight can be distinguished from those that cause aversion. It remains unclear whether brainstem Glp1r neurons contribute to the normal regulation of energy balance and whether GLP1RAs control appetite via circuits distinct from those that mediate aversive responses, however. Here, we silenced Glp1r neurons in the nucleus of the solitary tract or area postrema (NTSGlp1r or APGlp1r neurons, respectively) or restored their GLP1R signaling on an otherwise GLP1R-deficient background to determine physiological and pharmacological roles for each neuron population. Although NTSGlp1r neurons contributed to the normal restraint of food intake and body weight, they failed to mediate GLP1RA-dependent weight loss. In contrast, while we detected no role for APGlp1r neurons in physiological feeding, they mediated both the weight-lowering and aversive effects of GLP1RAs. Therefore, while non-aversive NTSGlp1r neurons control physiologic satiation they do not contribute to weight loss during GLP1RA treatment. Rather, APGlp1r neurons mediate both the weight-lowering and aversive effects of GLP1RAs, preventing the separation of their nauseating and weight-loss effects at a circuit level.
Warren T. Yacawych, Yi Wang, Guoxiang Zhou, Shad Hassan, Cagri Bodur, Elisabeth Walters, John G. Santinga, Frederike Sass, Martin deVaux, Stace Kernodle, Iris Wu, Jenny M. Brown, Dylan M. Belmont-Rausch, Alan C. Rupp, Abigail J. Tomlinson, Zitian Lin, Emma VanTongeren, Anna Secher, Kirsten Raun, Tune H. Pers, Randy J. Seeley, Martin G. Myers Jr., Weiwei Qiu
Usage data is cumulative from September 2026 through September 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 198 | 0 |
| 61 | 0 | |
| Supplemental data | 14 | 0 |
| Citation downloads | 18 | 0 |
| Totals | 291 | 0 |
| Total Views | 291 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.