Mutation-associated neoantigens (MANAs) are highly cancer-specific targets for immunotherapy where peptides derived from intracellular mutant proteins are presented on the cell surface via HLA molecules. T cell–engaging bispecific antibodies and CAR T cells can target MANAs to eliminate cancer cells via T cell activation. However, the low antigen density of MANAs on the cell surface can limit therapeutic efficacy. Here, we investigated whether increasing the affinity of the H2 single-chain variable fragment (scFv) targeting the p53 R175H MANA (HMTEVVRHC presented on HLA-A*02:01) improves its therapeutic effect. We identified higher-affinity H2 variants via phage biopanning and a thiocyanate elution method. Increasing bispecific antibody affinity to the low nanomolar range increased cancer cell killing and tumor control in mouse xenograft models without sacrificing antigen specificity. We next asked how increasing scFv affinity impacts CAR T cell function — a matter of debate. We appended each variant scFv to a CD28z CAR, CD3γ, or the T cell receptor. In striking contrast to the bispecific antibody results, increasing CAR affinity decreased function in each CAR format due to lower T cell activation upon interaction with target cancer cells. These results have important implications for the design of future immunotherapeutic approaches targeting low-density antigens.
Sarah R. DiNapoli, Katharine M. Wright, Brian J. Mog, Alexander H. Pearlman, Tushar D. Nichakawade, Nikita Marcou, Emily Han-Chung Hsiue, Michael S. Hwang, Jacqueline Douglass, Qiang Liu, Evangeline Watson, Marco Dal Molin, Joshua D. Cohen, Maria Popoli, Suman Paul, Maximilian F. Konig, Nicolas Wyhs, P. Aitana Azurmendi, Stephanie Glavaris, Jiaxin Ge, Tolulope O. Awosika, Jin Liu, Kathleen L. Gabrielson, Sandra B. Gabelli, Drew M. Pardoll, Chetan Bettegowda, Nickolas Papadopoulos, Kenneth W. Kinzler, Shibin Zhou, Bert Vogelstein
Usage data is cumulative from January 2026 through August 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 4,194 | 448 |
| 796 | 107 | |
| Figure | 803 | 3 |
| Table | 507 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 734 | 39 |
| Citation downloads | 316 | 0 |
| Totals | 7,350 | 597 |
| Total Views | 7,947 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.