Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Journal stats
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • ASCI Milestone Awards
    • Video Abstracts
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Emerging therapeutic strategies in breast cancer (Oct 2026)
    • The cGAS-STING pathway: DNA sensing in health and disease (Jun 2026)
    • Neurodegeneration (Mar 2026)
    • Clinical innovation and scientific progress in GLP-1 medicine (Nov 2025)
    • Pancreatic Cancer (Jul 2025)
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • ASCI Milestone Awards
  • Video Abstracts
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Journal stats
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
ATR safeguards epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition by countering R-loops and enabling transcription reprogramming
Parasvi S. Patel, Jacob P. Matson, Xiaojuan Ran, Marcello Stanzione, Ajinkya S. Kawale, Mingchao Wang, Sneha Saxena, Conrad Sander, Jacquelyn Curtis, Jessica L. Hopkins, Edmond Wong, Ryan B. Corcoran, Daniel A. Haber, Nicholas J. Dyson, Shyamala Maheswaran, Lee Zou
Parasvi S. Patel, Jacob P. Matson, Xiaojuan Ran, Marcello Stanzione, Ajinkya S. Kawale, Mingchao Wang, Sneha Saxena, Conrad Sander, Jacquelyn Curtis, Jessica L. Hopkins, Edmond Wong, Ryan B. Corcoran, Daniel A. Haber, Nicholas J. Dyson, Shyamala Maheswaran, Lee Zou
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Cell biology Oncology

ATR safeguards epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition by countering R-loops and enabling transcription reprogramming

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Transitions of cancer cells between distinct cell states, which are typically driven by transcription reprogramming, fuel tumor plasticity, metastasis, and therapeutic resistance. Whether the transitions between cell states can be therapeutically targeted remains unknown. Here, using the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) as a model, we show that the transcription reprogramming during a cell-state transition induces genomic instability through R-loops and transcription-replication conflicts and that the cell-state transition cannot occur without the ATR kinase, a key regulator of the replication stress response. ATR inhibition during EMT not only increased transcription- and replication-dependent genomic instability, but also disrupted transcription reprogramming. Unexpectedly, ATR inhibition elevated R-loop–associated DNA damage at the SNAI1 gene, a key driver of the transcription reprogramming during EMT, triggering ATM- and Polycomb-mediated transcription repression of SNAI1. Beyond SNAI1, ATR also suppressed R-loops and antagonized repressive chromatin at a subset of EMT genes. Importantly, inhibition of ATR in tumors undergoing EMT reduced tumor growth and metastasis, suggesting that ATR inhibition eliminates cancer cells in transition. Thus, during EMT, ATR not only protects genome integrity but also enables transcription reprogramming, revealing that ATR is a safeguard of cell-state transitions and a target to suppress tumor plasticity.

Authors

Parasvi S. Patel, Jacob P. Matson, Xiaojuan Ran, Marcello Stanzione, Ajinkya S. Kawale, Mingchao Wang, Sneha Saxena, Conrad Sander, Jacquelyn Curtis, Jessica L. Hopkins, Edmond Wong, Ryan B. Corcoran, Daniel A. Haber, Nicholas J. Dyson, Shyamala Maheswaran, Lee Zou

×

Figure 2

ATR is required for efficient EMT.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
ATR is required for efficient EMT.
(A) Scatterplot of immunofluorescence...
(A) Scatterplot of immunofluorescence experiment in MCF10A Z-cad cells. Cells were treated with siCtrl or siATR-1 for 48 h, then treated with 5 ng/mL TGF-β for an additional 0, 24, or 48 h, then fixed and stained for GFP, RFP, γH2AX, and DAPI. Knockdown efficiency of siATR-1 is shown on the right. (B) Representative immunofluorescence images of experiment in A. Original magnification, ×20. (C) Bar graph of cells from A and B, color coded for single positive GFP (ZEB1) or RFP (E-cadherin), double positive for both, or double negative for no staining. (D) Quantification of mean γH2AX intensity from the immunofluorescence experiment in A–C. (E) Bar graph of MCF10A Z-cad cells treated with 5 ng/mL TGF-β for 0, 24, or 48 h and at the same time DMSO or 1 μM AZD6738, color coded for single positive GFP (ZEB1) or RFP (E-cadherin), double positive for both, or double negative for no staining. Cells were fixed and stained for GFP, RFP, γH2AX, and DAPI. (F) Quantification of mean γH2AX intensity from the immunofluorescence experiment at 24 h in E. (G) Representative images and quantification of transwell migration (normalized to DMSO) in MCF10A cells treated for 24 h with 5 ng/mL TGF-β, 1 μM AZD6738, or both. Statistical significance was determined using 1-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple-comparison test for D and F and 1-way ANOVA for G. Data are presented as mean ± SEM in all graphs for 3 biological replicates. For scatterplots in D and F, each replicate is indicated by a different symbol. P values are indicated in the figure.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts