Anemia is the primary clinical manifestation of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), but the molecular pathogenesis of ineffective erythropoiesis remains incompletely understood. Luspatercept, an activin receptor 2B (ACVRIIB-Fc) ligand trap, has been approved to treat anemia, however its molecular mechanism of action is unclear. We found that the ACVR2B, its ligand GDF11, and effector, SMAD2, are upregulated in MDS patient samples. GDF11 inhibited human erythropoiesis in vitro and caused anemia in zebrafish, effects that were abrogated by luspatercept. Upon GDF11 stimulation of human erythroid progenitors, SMAD2 binding occurred in the erythroid regulatory regions, including at GATA1 intron. Intronic SMAD2 binding led to skipping of exon 2 of GATA1, resulting in a shorter, hypomorphic isoform (GATA1s). CRISPR deletion of the SMAD2 binding intronic region decreased GATA1s production upon GDF11 stimulation. Expression of gata1s in a mouse model led to anemia, rescued by a murine ActRIIB-Fc (RAP-536). Finally, RNA-seq analysis of samples from the Phase 3 MEDALIST trial revealed that responders to Luspatercept had a higher proportion of GATA1s compared to non-responders. Moreover, the increase RBCs post-treatment was linked to a relative decrease in GATA1s isoform. Our study indicates that GDF11-mediated SMAD2 activation results in an increase in functionally impaired GATA1 isoforms, consequently contributing to anemia and influencing responses to Luspatercept in MDS.
Srinivas Aluri, Te Ling, Ellen Fraint, Samarpana Chakraborty, Kevin Zhang, Aarif Ahsan, Leah Kravets, Gowri Poigaialwar, Rongbao Zhao, Kith Pradhan, Anitria Cotton, Kimo Bachiashvili, Jung-In Yang, Anjali Budhathoki, Beamon Agarwal, Shanisha Gordon-Mitchell, Milagros Carbajal, Srabani Sahu, Jacqueline Boultwood, Andrea Pellagatti, Ulrich Steidl, Amittha Wickrema, Satish Nandakumar, Aditi Shastri, Rajasekhar N.V.S. Suragani, Teresa V. Bowman, John D. Crispino, Sadanand Vodala, Amit Verma
Usage data is cumulative from May 2025 through June 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 608 | 0 |
255 | 0 | |
Supplemental data | 102 | 0 |
Citation downloads | 30 | 0 |
Totals | 995 | 0 |
Total Views | 995 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.