Glycogenolysis and gluconeogenesis ensure sufficient hepatic glucose production during energy shortages. Here, we report that hepatic glycogen levels control the phosphorylation of a transcriptional coactivator to determine the amplitude of gluconeogenesis. Decreased liver glycogen during fasting promotes gluconeogenic gene expression, while feeding-induced glycogen accumulation suppresses it. Liver-specific deletion of the glycogen scaffolding protein, protein targeting to glycogen (PTG), reduces glycogen levels, increases the expression of gluconeogenic genes, and promotes glucose production in primary hepatocytes. In contrast, liver glycogen phosphorylase (PYGL) knockdown or inhibition increases glycogen levels and represses gluconeogenic gene expression. These changes in hepatic glycogen levels are sensed by AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK). AMPK activity is increased when glycogen levels decline, resulting in the phosphorylation and stabilization of CREB-regulated transcriptional coactivator 2 (CRTC2), which is crucial for the full activation of the cAMP-responsive transcriptional factor CREB. High glycogen allosterically inhibits AMPK, leading to CRTC2 degradation and reduced CREB transcriptional activity. Hepatocytes with low glycogen levels or high AMPK activity show higher CRTC2 protein levels, priming the cell for gluconeogenesis through transcriptional regulation. Thus, glycogen plays a regulatory role in controlling hepatic glucose metabolism through the glycogen/AMPK/CRTC2 signaling axis, safeguarding efficient glucose output during fasting and suppressing it during feeding.
Bichen Zhang, Morgan M. Johnson, Timothy Yuan, Tammy-Nhu Nguyen, Junichi Okada, Fajun Yang, Alus M. Xiaoli, Liana H. Melikian, Songran Xu, Benyamin Dadpey, Jeffrey E. Pessin, Alan R. Saltiel
Usage data is cumulative from June 2025 through July 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 1,597 | 104 |
298 | 21 | |
Figure | 402 | 0 |
Supplemental data | 200 | 4 |
Citation downloads | 114 | 0 |
Totals | 2,611 | 129 |
Total Views | 2,740 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.