The incretin receptor agonists semaglutide and tirzepatide have transformed the medical management of obesity. The neural mechanisms by which incretin analogs regulate appetite remain incompletely understood, and dissecting this process is critical for the development of next-generation anti-obesity drugs that are more targeted and tolerable. Moreover, the physiologic functions of incretins in appetite regulation and gut-brain communication have remained elusive. Using in vivo fiber photometry, we discovered distinct pharmacologic and physiologic roles for the incretin hormones glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1). We showed that GIP, but not GLP-1, was required for normal nutrient-mediated inhibition of hunger-promoting AgRP neurons. By contrast, both GIP and GLP-1 analogs at pharmacologic doses were sufficient to inhibit AgRP neurons. The magnitude of neural inhibition was proportional to the effect of each incretin on food intake, and dual GIP and GLP-1 receptor agonism more potently inhibited AgRP neurons and suppressed food intake than either agonist alone. Our results have revealed a role for endogenous GIP in gut-brain appetite regulation and indicate that incretin analogs act in part via AgRP neurons to mediate their anorectic effects.
Hayley E. McMorrow, Andrew B. Cohen, Carolyn M. Lorch, Nikolas W. Hayes, Stefan W. Fleps, Joshua A. Frydman, Jessica L. Xia, Ricardo J. Samms, Lisa R. Beutler
Usage data is cumulative from August 2025 through August 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 60 | 0 |
23 | 0 | |
Supplemental data | 1 | 0 |
Totals | 84 | 0 |
Total Views | 84 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.