Airway mucus clearance from the lungs occurs by 2 widely recognized mechanisms: cilia-mediated clearance and high-velocity airflow-mediated cough clearance. However, a potentially important third mechanism of mucus clearance, referred to as cilia-independent gas–liquid transport (GLT), was proposed based on in vitro model systems to occur during normal tidal breathing but has largely been overlooked. We conducted in vitro and in vivo studies to investigate the role of tidal breathing airflow rates in mucus clearance. An in vitro airway culture bead-tracking model demonstrated airflow-dependent mucus transport at tidal breathing flow rates. As with other modes of mucus clearance, GLT was critically dependent on mucus concentration. In vivo studies in cilial beat-deficient mice demonstrated that GLT-mediated mucus clearance occurs during tidal breathing in the absence of cough, and the rate of GLT mucus clearance was dependent on breathing frequency and body orientation. These studies demonstrated that GLT is a third mechanism of mucus clearance and likely represents a significant mode of clearance in persons with cilial dysfunction. These findings indicate that increasing breathing rates through exercise, using mucus rehydrating agents or mucolytics, or combining these approaches may restore clinically and physiologically meaningful airway clearance in these patients.
Siddharth K. Shenoy, Mark Gutay, Ian Brown, Troy D. Rogers, Kane Banner, Nico Olegario, Nicholas Griffin, Henry P. Goodell, Bryan Yoder, David S. Lalush, David A. Edwards, Richard C. Boucher, Barbara R. Grubb, Brian Button
Usage data is cumulative from March 2026 through May 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 931 | 0 |
| 388 | 0 | |
| Figure | 108 | 0 |
| Table | 4 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 3 | 0 |
| Citation downloads | 97 | 0 |
| Totals | 1,531 | 0 |
| Total Views | 1,531 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.