BACKGROUND EBV is associated with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), but the existence of a NPC protective antibody against EBV-associated antigens remains unclear.METHODS Patients with NPC and matched controls were identified from prospective cohorts comprising 75,481 participants in southern China. ELISA and conditional logistic regression were applied to assess the effects of gp42-IgG on NPC. The expression of HLA-II, the gp42 receptor, in nasopharyngeal atypical dysplasia and its effect on EBV infection of epithelial cells were evaluated.FINDINGS gp42-IgG titers were significantly lower in patients with NPC compared with controls across various follow-up years before NPC diagnosis (P < 0.05). Individuals in the highest quartile for gp42-IgG titers had a 71% NPC risk reduction compared with those in the lowest quartile (ORsQ4vsQ1= 0.29, 95% CIs = 0·15 to 0.55, P < 0.001). Each unit antibody titer increase was associated with a 34% lower risk of NPC (OR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.54–0.81, Ptrend< 0.001). The protective effect of of gp42-IgG was observed in patients diagnosed 5 years or more, 1–5 years, and less than 1 year after blood collection (P < 0.05). HLA-II expression was detected in 13 of 27 specimens of nasopharyngeal atypical dysplasia, and its overexpression substantially promoted epithelial cell–origin EBV infection.CONCLUSION Elevated EBV gp42-IgG titers can reduce NPC risk, indicating that gp42 is a potential EBV prophylactic vaccine target.TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT00941538, NCT02501980, ChiCTR2000028776, ChiCTR2100041628.FUNDING Noncommunicable Chronic Diseases-National Science and Technology Major Project (2023ZD0501003), National Natural Science Foundation of China (82030046, 82073625, 81860601, 82373655), Local Innovative and Research Teams Project of Guangdong Pearl River Talents Program (2019BT02Y198), and Central Financial Transfer Payment Projects of the Chinese Government, Cancer Research Grant of Zhongshan City.
Xiang-Wei Kong, Guo-Long Bu, Hua Chen, Yu-Hua Huang, Zhiwei Liu, Yin-Feng Kang, Yan-Cheng Li, Xia Yu, Biao-Hua Wu, Zi-Qian Li, Xin-Chun Chen, Shang-Hang Xie, Dong-Feng Lin, Tong Li, Shu-Mei Yan, Run-Kun Han, Nan Huang, Qian-Yu Wang, Yan Li, Ao Zhang, Qian Zhong, Xiao-Ming Huang, Weimin Ye, Ming-Fang Ji, Yong-Lin Cai, Su-Mei Cao, Mu-Sheng Zeng
Usage data is cumulative from July 2025 through July 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 2,613 | 525 |
| 609 | 190 | |
| Figure | 345 | 0 |
| Table | 285 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 702 | 41 |
| Citation downloads | 218 | 0 |
| Totals | 4,772 | 756 |
| Total Views | 5,528 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.