Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • ASCI Milestone Awards
    • Video Abstracts
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Neurodegeneration (Mar 2026)
    • Clinical innovation and scientific progress in GLP-1 medicine (Nov 2025)
    • Pancreatic Cancer (Jul 2025)
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • ASCI Milestone Awards
  • Video Abstracts
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
ADORA2A-driven proline synthesis triggers epigenetic reprogramming in neuroendocrine prostate and lung cancers
Na Jing, Kai Zhang, Xinyu Chen, Kaiyuan Liu, Jinming Wang, Lingling Xiao, Wentian Zhang, Pengfei Ma, Penghui Xu, Chaping Cheng, Deng Wang, Huifang Zhao, Yuman He, Zhongzhong Ji, Zhixiang Xin, Yujiao Sun, Yingchao Zhang, Wei Bao, Yiming Gong, Liancheng Fan, Yiyi Ji, Guanglei Zhuang, Qi Wang, Baijun Dong, Pengcheng Zhang, Wei Xue, Wei-Qiang Gao, Helen He Zhu
Na Jing, Kai Zhang, Xinyu Chen, Kaiyuan Liu, Jinming Wang, Lingling Xiao, Wentian Zhang, Pengfei Ma, Penghui Xu, Chaping Cheng, Deng Wang, Huifang Zhao, Yuman He, Zhongzhong Ji, Zhixiang Xin, Yujiao Sun, Yingchao Zhang, Wei Bao, Yiming Gong, Liancheng Fan, Yiyi Ji, Guanglei Zhuang, Qi Wang, Baijun Dong, Pengcheng Zhang, Wei Xue, Wei-Qiang Gao, Helen He Zhu
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Metabolism Oncology

ADORA2A-driven proline synthesis triggers epigenetic reprogramming in neuroendocrine prostate and lung cancers

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Cell lineage plasticity is one of the major causes for the failure of targeted therapies in various cancers. However, the driver and actionable drug targets in promoting cancer cell lineage plasticity are scarcely identified. Here, we found that a G protein-coupled receptor, ADORA2A, is specifically upregulated during neuroendocrine differentiation, a common form of lineage plasticity in prostate cancer and lung cancer following targeted therapies. Activation of the ADORA2A signaling rewires the proline metabolism via an ERK/MYC/PYCR cascade. Increased proline synthesis promotes deacetylases SIRT6/7-mediated deacetylation of histone H3 at lysine 27 (H3K27), and thereby biases a global transcriptional output toward a neuroendocrine lineage profile. Ablation of Adora2a in genetically engineered mouse models inhibits the development and progression of neuroendocrine prostate and lung cancers, and, intriguingly, prevents the adenocarcinoma-to-neuroendocrine phenotypic transition. Importantly, pharmacological blockade of ADORA2A profoundly represses neuroendocrine prostate and lung cancer growth in vivo. Therefore, we believe that ADORA2A can be used as a promising therapeutic target to govern the epigenetic reprogramming in neuroendocrine malignancies.

Authors

Na Jing, Kai Zhang, Xinyu Chen, Kaiyuan Liu, Jinming Wang, Lingling Xiao, Wentian Zhang, Pengfei Ma, Penghui Xu, Chaping Cheng, Deng Wang, Huifang Zhao, Yuman He, Zhongzhong Ji, Zhixiang Xin, Yujiao Sun, Yingchao Zhang, Wei Bao, Yiming Gong, Liancheng Fan, Yiyi Ji, Guanglei Zhuang, Qi Wang, Baijun Dong, Pengcheng Zhang, Wei Xue, Wei-Qiang Gao, Helen He Zhu

×

Figure 9

Pharmacological inhibition of ADORA2A restrains NE tumor growth in vitro and in vivo.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Pharmacological inhibition of ADORA2A restrains NE tumor growth in vitro...
(A and B) The Cell Titer Glo assay shows that the ADORA2A antagonist SCH58261 restrains the proliferation of LASCPC-01 (A) and LNCaP/AR-shRB1/TP53 (B) NEPC cells in vitro (n = 4 biological replicates/group). (C and D) SCH58261 exerts no inhibitory effect on the proliferation of VCaP (C) cells and LNCaP/AR (D) ADPC cells in vitro (n = 4 biological replicates/group). (E and F) The in vivo tumor growth curves (E) and the endpoint tumors (F) derived from TRAMP-C1 (TC1) cells that were treated with either vehicle and SCH58261 (vehicle, n = 10; SCH58261, n = 6; Cells were subcutaneously injected into 6-week-old male BALB/c nude hosts). (G and H) The in vivo tumor growth curves (G) and the endpoint tumors (H) derived from Myc-CaP cells that were treated with either vehicle and SCH58261 (vehicle, n = 14; SCH58261, n = 14; Cells were s.c. inoculated into 6-week-old male FVB hosts). (I and J) The in vivo tumor growth curves (I) and the endpoint tumors (J) derived from LASCPC-01 cells that were treated with either vehicle and SCH58261 (vehicle, n = 13; SCH58261, n = 13; cells were s.c. injected into 6-week-old male BALB/c nude mice). (K and L) The in vivo tumor growth curves (I) and the endpoint tumors (J) derived from NCI-H146 cells that were treated with either vehicle and SCH58261 (vehicle, n = 5; SCH58261, n = 7; cells were s.c. injected into 6-week-old male BALB/c nude hosts). Student’s t test was used in A–D, E, G, I, and K. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01. The SCH58261 powder was dissolved in 3% DMSO, 10% HS-15, and 87% saline solution. 3 mg/kg SCH58261 was i.p. administered to each mouse every other day.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts