Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Pancreatic Cancer (Jul 2025)
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • Sex Differences in Medicine (Sep 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Top
  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal
  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Methods
  • Author contributions
  • Supplemental material
  • Acknowledgments
  • Footnotes
  • References
  • Version history
  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article

Advertisement

Research ArticleInfectious diseaseVascular biology Open Access | 10.1172/JCI168450

Endothelial ADAM10 utilization defines a molecular pathway of vascular injury in mice with bacterial sepsis

Danielle N. Alfano,1 Mark J. Miller,2 and Juliane Bubeck Wardenburg1

1Department of Pediatrics and

2Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.

Address correspondence to: Juliane Bubeck Wardenburg, 660 S. Euclid Ave, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA. Phone: 1.314.286.1747; Email: jbubeck@wustl.edu.

Find articles by Alfano, D. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Department of Pediatrics and

2Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.

Address correspondence to: Juliane Bubeck Wardenburg, 660 S. Euclid Ave, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA. Phone: 1.314.286.1747; Email: jbubeck@wustl.edu.

Find articles by Miller, M. in: PubMed | Google Scholar |

1Department of Pediatrics and

2Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.

Address correspondence to: Juliane Bubeck Wardenburg, 660 S. Euclid Ave, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA. Phone: 1.314.286.1747; Email: jbubeck@wustl.edu.

Find articles by Bubeck Wardenburg, J. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

Published October 3, 2023 - More info

Published in Volume 133, Issue 23 on December 1, 2023
J Clin Invest. 2023;133(23):e168450. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI168450.
© 2023 Alfano et al. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Published October 3, 2023 - Version history
Received: January 4, 2023; Accepted: September 28, 2023
View PDF
Abstract

The endothelium plays a critical role in the host response to infection and has been a focus of investigation in sepsis. While it is appreciated that intravascular thrombus formation, severe inflammation, and loss of endothelial integrity impair tissue oxygenation during sepsis, the precise molecular mechanisms that lead to endothelial injury remain poorly understood. We demonstrate here that endothelial ADAM10 was essential for the pathogenesis of Staphylococcus aureus sepsis, contributing to α-toxin–mediated (Hla-mediated) microvascular thrombus formation and lethality. As ADAM10 is essential for endothelial development and homeostasis, we examined whether other major human sepsis pathogens also rely on ADAM10-dependent pathways in pathogenesis. Mice harboring an endothelium-specific knockout of ADAM10 were protected against lethal Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Streptococcus pneumoniae sepsis, yet remained fully susceptible to group B streptococci and Candida albicans sepsis. These studies illustrate a previously unknown role for ADAM10 in sepsis-associated endothelial injury and suggest that understanding pathogen-specific divergent host pathways in sepsis may enable more precise targeting of disease.

Graphical Abstract
graphical abstract
Introduction

Bacterial sepsis is a global public health emergency, with an estimated incidence of nearly 50 million cases and 11 million deaths worldwide in 2017 (1). In the United States alone, sepsis accounts for more than $20 billion in total hospital costs (2). Sepsis is characterized by multisystem organ failure, which has been attributed to both pathogen-mediated injury and secondary insults that result from the host inflammatory response to infection (3). Despite decades of research and large-scale clinical trials of novel interventions, the mainstay of care for patients with sepsis remains limited to antibiotic administration and support of failing organs (4).

As a leading cause of human bacterial sepsis (5), Staphylococcus aureus invasive infections are also one of the most lethal (6). Studies of the molecular pathogenesis of S. aureus sepsis have implicated a wide array of virulence factors in evasion of the host immune response, perturbation of hemostasis, and compromise of tissue barrier integrity within the vasculature (7, 8). Among these, Staphylococcus aureus pore-forming toxins (PFTs), including α-toxin (α-hemolysin [Hla]) and an array of bicomponent leukocidins, have been the focus of intense investigation and therapeutic targeting in sepsis (9–16). Cell-type–specific injury mediated by these PFTs is dependent on the expression of distinct toxin receptors, which also define species specificity of toxin action (17). The leukocidins LukED and HlgAB are 2 widely expressed S. aureus PFTs that utilize the Duffy antigen receptor for chemokines (DARCs) as their cellular receptor (14). The leukocidin-DARC interaction contributes to vascular injury, tissue damage, and mortality, which are mitigated in an endothelial cell–specific, DARC-knockout mouse model (14). While strain-specific expression of the staphylococcal leukocidins is variable (17), Hla is expressed by nearly all clinical disease isolates and is required for the pathogenesis of S. aureus disease (10, 12, 18–20). The interaction of Hla with its cellular receptor A disintegrin and metalloprotease 10 (ADAM10) causes direct cellular injury through pore formation (18), but also leads to ADAM10 metalloprotease activation, resulting in pathologic cleavage of native ADAM10 substrates including VE-cadherin on endothelial cells (10). In the context of sepsis, Hla decreases platelet–endothelial cell adhesion through ADAM10-mediated cleavage of platelet glycoprotein VI (GPVI), compromising hemostasis but simultaneously promoting neutrophil inflammatory signaling by augmenting the platelet-neutrophil interaction (12). Both S. aureus infection and i.v. delivery of purified Hla induce platelet aggregation in the microvasculature, resulting in severe tissue injury (21). While S. aureus infection of mice harboring platelet-specific deletion of ADAM10 through PF4-mediated Cre recombinase expression (PF4 ADAM10–/–) is associated with a reduction in platelet aggregation within the liver (21) and improved intravascular hemostasis (12), these mice succumb to lethal sepsis unless ADAM10 is concurrently deleted in the myeloid cell lineage through expression of Cre recombinase under the control of the Lyz2 promoter (12).

Neutrophils and platelets cooperate to promote coagulation in the microvasculature to limit the action of invading pathogens in a process known as immunothrombosis (22). Recent studies in humans and animal models illustrate that perturbation of this immunothrombotic response can influence the outcome of the host-pathogen interaction in S. aureus sepsis. Platelets play an essential role in host defense against S. aureus infection through the production of microbicidal proteins (23). In humans, thrombocytopenia and elevated serum IL-10 levels are associated with increased severity of S. aureus sepsis and mortality, while an enhanced IL-1β response favors clearance of the pathogen from the bloodstream (24–28). Further illustrating the importance of platelet-mediated immune function, delivery of the platelet inhibitor ticagrelor improves the outcome of mice infected with S. aureus (28), and retrospective clinical data analysis suggests that ticagrelor mitigates infection risk in humans, decreasing the incidence of S. aureus bacteremia in patients receiving long-term antiplatelet therapy (29, 30). Although these data shed light on the role of platelets and inflammation in the host response to S. aureus infection, they fail to inform an understanding of the cellular mechanisms by which infection couples endothelial injury and platelet activation within the vasculature to result in immunothrombosis.

Endothelial injury is the primary physiologic stimulus for platelet activation and aggregation (31). Our findings on the role of the Hla-ADAM10 interaction in endothelial injury (10, 12), together with the observation that a SNP in the ADAM10 promoter influences the outcome of human bacterial sepsis (32), led us to hypothesize that endothelial injury by Hla may initiate the series of events that culminate in S. aureus sepsis–associated microvascular thrombosis. ADAM10 is essential in vascular cell development, homeostasis, and regeneration (33–39). While germline deletion of ADAM10 results in embryonic lethality at E9.5 (40), mice harboring endothelium-specific deletion of ADAM10 exhibit a severe abnormality of vascular development due in large part to defective Notch signaling (41). Deletion of ADAM10 by E7.5 results in lethality, however deletion after E12.5 preserves viability, but mice display abnormal blood vessels in multiple organs (42). To circumvent the impact of ADAM10 deletion on vascular development, we utilized an endothelium-specific inducible knockout system to assess the role of the metalloprotease in sepsis. Here, we demonstrate that deletion of endothelial ADAM10 provided protection against lethal S. aureus sepsis by limiting platelet aggregation and microvascular occlusion. Moreover, mice harboring endothelial ADAM10 deletion were protected against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Streptococcus pneumoniae sepsis, yet maintained susceptibility to lethal infection with other human sepsis pathogens. These findings reveal a role for ADAM10 in molecular specificity of the host-pathogen interaction and suggest that ADAM10 may represent a promising target for sepsis therapies in a specific and definable subset of bacterial infections.

Results

To study the role of endothelial ADAM10 in S. aureus sepsis, we generated transgenic mice that enable endothelial cell–specific deletion of ADAM10 under control of the VE-cadherin promoter that drives expression of a tamoxifen-inducible (TAM-inducible) Cre recombinase (Supplemental Figure 1A; supplemental material available online with this article; https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI168450DS1) (43). ADAM10 staining of isolated aorta and mesenteric artery after TAM treatment of VE-Cad ADAM10loxP/loxP mice demonstrated a 53% and 37% reduction in Adam10 expression, respectively, compared with that observed in vessels from control VE-Cad ADAM10WT/WT mice (Figure 1A and Supplemental Figure 1B). Although WT control mice (VE-Cad ADAM10+/+) succumbed to sepsis induced by i.v. inoculation of 1 × 108 CFU S. aureus USA300/LAC, endothelial ADAM10-knockout mice (VE-Cad ADAM10–/–) were protected against lethal infection (Figure 1B). Similarly, VE-Cad ADAM10–/– mice were protected against lethality induced by i.v. delivery of purified active Hla, confirming the sufficiency of this toxin for ADAM10-dependent outcomes (Figure 1C). Evaluation of health scores (Supplemental Table 1 and Supplemental Figure 1C) and physical activity (Supplemental Videos 1 and 2) over the course of S. aureus infection reflected protection against the clinical disease observed in VE-Cad ADAM10–/– mice relative to controls, despite similar weight loss in both groups (Supplemental Figure 1D). S. aureus recovery from multiple tissues was comparable in control and VE-Cad ADAM10–/– mice 24 hours after infection (Supplemental Figure 1E), suggesting that the improved survival of VE-Cad ADAM10–/– mice was not simply related to early bacterial control.

Staphylococcus aureus targets endothelial ADAM10 to cause lethal sepsis.Figure 1

Staphylococcus aureus targets endothelial ADAM10 to cause lethal sepsis. (A) ADAM10 (red) staining in the descending aorta and mesenteric artery from control or VE-Cad ADAM10–/– mice. DAPI (blue) denotes cell nuclei; collagen autofluorescence (green). Scale bars: 30 μm. (B) Survival following lethal S. aureus infection in VE-Cad ADAM10–/– (n = 37) or control (n = 18) female mice. Independent experiments were repeated 4 times, and data were pooled. (C) Survival following lethal purified Hla sepsis in VE-Cad ADAM10–/– (n = 9) or control (n = 10) female mice. Independent experiments were repeated twice, and data were pooled. (D) Serum IL-10 analysis 8 and 24 hours after infection in female VE-Cad ADAM10–/– mice or controls. Data represent 3 independent pooled experiments. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM. (E) Mouse platelet count enumerated 4 hours after lethal infection with S. aureus in male and female mice. Data are from 3 independent pooled experiments and are presented as the mean ± SD. *P ≤ 0.05 and **P ≤ 0.01, by unpaired, 2-tailed t test.

As human mortality from S. aureus sepsis correlates with host immunologic markers of inflammation and a sustained decrease in circulating platelet numbers (24–26, 44), we evaluated serum cytokine levels and quantified platelets in WT and VE-Cad ADAM10–/– mice that received a sublethal i.v. inoculum of S. aureus. Serum IL-10 was increased in WT mice 8 hours after infection, whereas VE-Cad ADAM10–/– mice had a minimal increase in IL-10 levels (Figure 1D), mirroring the response seen in humans who survive infection. Although serum IL-1β levels were elevated 8 hours after infection, we observed no significant difference in this response between VE-Cad ADAM10–/– and control mice (Supplemental Figure 1F). Similarly, both groups of mice exhibited comparable platelet counts 4 hours after infection (Figure 1E).

On the basis of these findings, we hypothesized that Hla-induced endothelial damage may incite immunothrombosis during S. aureus sepsis, coupling a functional alteration of endothelial integrity and platelet function. To inform an understanding of microvascular injury induced by S. aureus in situ, we used 2-photon microscopy to visualize platelet-endothelial interactions within the hepatic vasculature following infection of VE-Cad ADAM10–/– mice and matched controls with a nonlethal inoculum of S. aureus. WT mice developed more substantial platelet aggregates than did VE-Cad ADAM10–/– mice 6–8 hours after infection (Figure 2, A and B, and Supplemental Figure 2A). We observed a limited thrombus burden in both control and VE-Cad ADAM10–/– uninfected mice (Supplemental Figure 2B), which was statistically different from that observed in infected VE-Cad ADAM10–/– mice (average thrombi area of 104 μm2 vs. 635 μm2, SEM ± 97.93, P < 0.0001). Mice with platelet-specific ADAM10 deletion (PF4 ADAM10–/–) were also protected from platelet aggregate formation within the liver vasculature, whereas mice with myeloid-specific ADAM10 deletion (LysM ADAM10–/–) were not protected (Supplemental Figure 2, C and D). As neither PF4 ADAM10–/– nor LysM ADAM10–/– mice are protected from lethal S. aureus sepsis (12), these data together suggest that microvascular injury and platelet aggregation are intimately linked to impair tissue oxygenation and organ function (45, 46). We thus examined end-organ injury in VE-Cad ADAM10–/– mice. Although gross pathologic analysis of control livers revealed large areas of ischemia and necrosis (Figure 2C), VE-Cad ADAM10–/– mice had a markedly lesser degree of injury following infection that was also evident on histopathologic analysis of the liver (Figure 2D) and in quantification of serum alanine aminotransferase levels (Figure 2E). We did not detect differences in liver IL-1β or IL-10 levels after infection (Supplemental Figure 2, E and F), suggesting that local inflammation alone is not readily equated with the end-organ tissue damage observed.

ADAM10 alters endothelial cell–platelet interactions in response to S. aureFigure 2

ADAM10 alters endothelial cell–platelet interactions in response to S. aureus and contributes to sepsis-associated injury. (A) Representative 2-photon image of control or VE-Cad ADAM10–/– mouse livers 6 to 8 hours after nonlethal S. aureus sepsis. Vasculature (red, Qdots655), platelets (green, GPIbβ). Scale bars: 50 μm. Lower panels display images outlined by a dashed line box. Scale bars: 20 μm. White arrows denote thrombi. (B) Quantification of the total area of platelet accumulation within the vasculature in mouse liver as treated in A. Data represent 5–7 FOV per mouse in control (n = 7F) and VE-Cad ADAM10–/– (n = 6F) mice. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM. Data for individual FOV within each mouse are shown in Supplemental Figure 2A. (C) Representative images of the liver 24 hours after S. aureus infection in control or VE-Cad ADAM10–/– mice. (D) H&E-stained liver sections from control or VE-Cad ADAM10–/– mice 24 hours after infection, with the area of necrosis outlined. Scale bars: 100 μm. Images in C and D are representative of 5 mice per condition from 2 independent experiments. (E) Serum ALT in infected control (n = 11 males, 7 females) or VE-Cad ADAM10–/– (n = 7 males, 6 females) mice 24 hours after nonlethal S. aureus infection. Data represent 3 independent pooled experiments and are presented as the mean ± SEM. (F) Representative 2-photon images of control or VE-Cad ADAM10–/– mouse livers 2–4 hours after lethal S. aureus sepsis. Vasculature (red, Qdots655); vWF (green). Scale bars: 10 μm. White arrows denote vWF deposition. (G) Quantification of the total area of vWF accumulation within the vasculature in mouse liver as treated in F. Data represent 5–6 FOV per mouse in control (n = 6F) and VE-Cad ADAM10–/– (n = 4 females, 2 males) mice per group and represent the mean ± SEM. Data for individual FOV within each mouse are shown in Supplemental Figure 3F. *P ≤ 0.05 and **P ≤ 0.01, by nested t test for in vivo imaging (B and G) or unpaired, 2-tailed t test (E).

Our hypothesis that endothelial injury caused by Hla initiates a pathologic platelet response within the vasculature was consistent with findings in a recent study by Sun et al. demonstrating that treatment with ticagrelor, a platelet P2Y12 inhibitor, protected against S. aureus sepsis (28). Ticagrelor blocked Hla-mediated platelet cytotoxicity in an ADAM10-dependent manner in vitro, allowing for improved clearance of the pathogen. Consistent with these findings, WT mice treated with ticagrelor in our model system exhibited a significant reduction in platelet aggregation within the hepatic vasculature compared with vehicle-treated controls (Supplemental Figure 3, A and B). As ticagrelor has been shown to exhibit pleiotropic effects beyond platelet inhibition (47), we examined whether ticagrelor affected endothelial ADAM10 activation and endothelial dysfunction. Hla-induced microvascular injury leads to barrier disruption and vascular permeability (10), inducing the deposition of von Willebrand factor (vWF) on the endothelium (12). vWF is critical in hemostasis, mediating initial platelet tethering under fluid shear stress in the vasculature (48). Treatment of human pulmonary artery endothelial cells (HPAECs) with purified Hla led to increased ADAM10 activity (Supplemental Figure 3C) and LDH release indicative of cellular injury (Supplemental Figure 3D), which was abrogated by pretreatment of HPAECs with the specific ADAM10 inhibitor GI254023X. Pretreatment of HPAECs with ticagrelor did not modulate ADAM10 activation (Supplemental Figure 3C) or LDH release induced by Hla (Supplemental Figure 3D); similarly, ticagrelor did not prevent VE-cadherin cleavage or vWF extrusion in response to Hla (Supplemental Figure 3E), but these were ablated by pretreatment with GI254023X. Thus, we conclude that the effects of ticagrelor on S. aureus sepsis appeared to be focused on the modulation of platelet function, which we hypothesize is downstream of endothelial injury elicited by the pathogen.

To assess the temporal nature of endothelial injury and platelet aggregation in vivo, we used 2-photon microscopy to visualize vWF deposition within the hepatic vasculature during S. aureus sepsis in VE-Cad ADAM10–/– mice or matched controls. Within 4 hours of infection, WT mice developed increased vWF deposition compared with VE-Cad ADAM10–/– mice (Figure 2, F and G, and Supplemental Figure 3F) preceding the difference in platelet aggregation seen at 6–8 hours (Figure 2, A and B). Together, these findings suggest a sequence of events in the microvasculature in which Hla-mediated endothelial injury functioned as an inciting event, leading to the presentation of vWF on the injured endothelium as a platelet tethering site. This pathogenic sequence presents 2 distinct therapeutic opportunities to combat sepsis: protecting the endothelium from initial injury and preventing platelet aggregation that is catalyzed by this injury.

Endothelial injury is not unique to S. aureus disease, as it has been studied in the molecular pathogenesis of experimental sepsis in multiple models. The clinical manifestations of endovascular injury and progression of severe sepsis exhibit an unexpected homogeneity across distinct infectious pathogens, suggesting that pathogen-specific pathways that incite injury trigger a convergent biologic process in the host. We considered whether ADAM10 may be an upstream molecular pathway in sepsis pathogenesis, especially given the observation that an ADAM10 promoter polymorphism modulates sepsis severity (32). Three other bacterial cytotoxins have been linked to ADAM10 activation in vitro. We previously demonstrated that treatment of alveolar epithelial cells with S. pneumoniae pneumolysin (PLY), a cholesterol-dependent cytolysin, elicited ADAM10-mediated cleavage of epithelial cadherin (E-cadherin) (19). PLY is a PFT produced by nearly all clinical isolates and is required for virulence in invasive infection (49). Formation of the PLY pore on endothelial cells causes calcium influx, thereby activating phospholipase A2 (50) and stimulating vWF secretion (51). Reboud et al. demonstrated that Pseudomonas aeruginosa PFT exolysin (ExlA) and Serratia marcescens hemolysin (ShlA) trigger ADAM10 activation by promoting Ca2+ influx into the endothelial cell, leading to VE-cadherin cleavage (52). P. aeruginosa also disrupts endothelial barrier integrity through the secreted elastase LasB (53), whereas the type 3 secretion system (T3SS) effector ExoU exhibits phospholipase A2 activity, rapidly inducing membrane injury (54, 55) and triggering vWF release from endothelial cells in vitro (56). Among P. aeruginosa strains, expression of ExlA or the T3SS appear to be mutually exclusive mechanisms by which endothelial cells are injured (55, 57, 58). The ability of diverse bacterial cytotoxins to elicit endothelial injury, together with the central role of ADAM10 in endothelial homeostasis, led us to hypothesize that ADAM10 is a central mediator of sepsis-induced endothelial dysfunction. To address this, we initially focused on P. aeruginosa, S. pneumoniae, group B Streptococcus (GBS), and Candida albicans, which are leading causes of sepsis in pediatric and adult populations (59, 60). Like S. aureus, P. aeruginosa, and S. pneumoniae, both GBS and C. albicans harbor cytotoxins that cause membrane injury. GBS β-hemolysin/cytolysin is a cytolytic pigment that plays a key role in GBS pathogenesis, resulting in membrane injury in multiple cell types that govern barrier stability and the host immune response (61). Candidalysin, the PFT of C. albicans, compromises barrier integrity by uncontrolled Ca2+ influx leading to a proinflammatory cascade (62, 63). Upon infection of WT and VE-Cad ADAM10–/– mice with these pathogens, VE-Cad ADAM10–/– mice were protected against lethal sepsis caused by P. aeruginosa (Figure 3A) and S. pneumoniae (Figure 3B), but not sepsis due to GBS (Figure 3C) or C. albicans (Figure 3D). Clinical health scores during P. aeruginosa and S. pneumoniae infection mimicked those observed in VE-Cad ADAM10–/– mice during S. aureus sepsis (Supplemental Figure 4, A–D). We next assessed whether platelet aggregation within the hepatic vasculature was altered in an ADAM10-dependent manner following infection with these pathogens. In vivo imaging of VE-Cad ADAM10–/– mice infected with P. aeruginosa or S. pneumoniae revealed significantly reduced areas of platelet aggregation in the liver 6–8 hours after infection compared with control WT mice (Figure 4, A and B, and Supplemental Figure 4, E and F). In contrast, platelet thrombus formation was indistinguishable in control and VE-Cad ADAM10–/– mice after infection with GBS or C. albicans (Figure 4, A and B, and Supplemental Figure 4, G and H). To further investigate the role of endothelial ADAM10 as an inciting factor in microvascular injury in vivo following infection with P. aeruginosa or S. pneumoniae, we examined whether the use of the ADAM10 active site inhibitor GI254023X could prevent pathogen-induced platelet aggregation on the injured endothelium. C57Bl/6 mice were pretreated for a 3-day period with GI254023X via i.p. injection and then infected with either P. aeruginosa or S. pneumoniae and imaged as described above. We found that treatment with the ADAM10 inhibitor protected against platelet aggregation within the hepatic vasculature in both P. aeruginosa and S. pneumoniae sepsis in a manner similar to that observed in VE-Cad ADAM10–/– mice (Figure 5, A and B, and Supplemental Figure 5, A and B). Together, these studies provide the first in vivo evidence to our knowledge that the role of endothelial ADAM10 in the pathophysiology of sepsis extends beyond that of the known Hla-ADAM10 complex, exhibiting pathogen specificity.

Endothelial ADAM10 mediates lethal sepsis in a pathogen-specific manner.Figure 3

Endothelial ADAM10 mediates lethal sepsis in a pathogen-specific manner. Survival curves for control and VE-Cad ADAM10–/– mice infected with lethal P. aeruginosa (A, n = 21 [13 males, 8 females], n = 20 [11 males, 8 females]); S. pneumoniae (B, n = 24 [8 males, 16 females], n = 23 [11 males, 12 females]; GBS (C, n = 23 [9 males, 14 females], n = 14 [7 males, 7 females]; or C. albicans (D, n = 12 males, 13 males ). **P ≤ 0.01, by log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test for survival curves.

Endothelial ADAM10 mediates platelet aggregation in a pathogen-specific manFigure 4

Endothelial ADAM10 mediates platelet aggregation in a pathogen-specific manner. (A) Representative 2-photon images of control and VE-Cad ADAM10–/– mouse livers at 6–8 hours and (B) corresponding quantification of the total area of platelet accumulation within the vasculature of mouse livers after P. aeruginosa, S. pneumoniae, GBS, or C. albicans sepsis. Vasculature (red, Qdots655); platelets (green, GPIbβ). Scale bars: 20 μm. White arrows denote thrombi. Data represent 5–7 FOV per mouse in 5–6 male and female mice per group and indicate the mean ± SEM. Measurements for individual FOV within each mouse are displayed in Supplemental Figure 4, E–H. *P ≤ 0.05 and ***P ≤ 0.001, by nested t test.

ADAM10 mediates platelet aggregation.Figure 5

ADAM10 mediates platelet aggregation. (A) Representative 2-photon images of C57Bl/6 mice 6–8 hours after P. aeruginosa or S. pneumoniae sepsis, pretreated for 3 days with vehicle or the ADAM10 inhibitor GI254023X. Vasculature (red, Qdots655), platelets (green, GPIbβ). Scale bar: 20 μm. White arrows denote thrombi. (B) Quantification of the total area of platelet accumulation within the vasculature in mouse livers as treated in A. Data represent 5–7 FOV per mouse in 6–7 male and female mice per group and are presented as the mean ± SEM. Measurements for individual FOV within each mouse are displayed in Supplemental Figure 5, A and B. **P ≤ 0.01, by nested t test for each treatment group.

Like S. aureus, many pathogens utilize PFTs or other membrane-injurious cytotoxins to damage and manipulate the endothelium (54, 64–66), raising the possibility that these virulence factors may couple intravascular infection with the observed dependence on ADAM10. PFTs and other membrane-active cytotoxins generally have 2 main effects during infection: the compromising of barrier integrity and disruption of the host immunological response (64, 67, 68). On the basis of our observation that microvascular occlusion in response to endothelial injury distinguished S. aureus, P. aeruginosa, and S. pneumoniae from pathogens that exhibited ADAM10 independence, we leveraged the 2-photon in vivo imaging model of platelet aggregation to examine the impact of membrane-active cytotoxins on disease pathogenesis. Upon infection of C57Bl/6 mice with WT S. aureus LAC or an isogenic Hla-deficient mutant (LACΔhla), we confirmed that platelet aggregation in response to S. aureus sepsis was dependent on Hla (Figure 6, A and D, and Supplemental Figure 5C). We then extended these studies to determine whether microvascular occlusion in P. aeruginosa and S. pneumoniae infection was dependent on cytotoxin expression. We used WT P. aeruginosa PA99 or its isogenic strain PA99ΔexoSTU, which is impaired in effector secretion without disruption of expression of the T3SS (69), and WT S. pneumoniae 6A or its isogenic PLY-deficient mutant (6AΔply). Compared with their WT strains, both toxin mutant strains elicited a reduction in platelet aggregation within the hepatic vasculature 6–8 hours after infection (Figure 6, B–D, and Supplemental Figure 5, D and E). Together, these data suggest that specific bacterial cytotoxins may either initiate or amplify ADAM10-dependent endothelial injury, resulting in platelet aggregation and microvascular thrombosis in the pathogenesis of sepsis.

Bacterial cytotoxins mediate sepsis-induced platelet aggregation in the livFigure 6

Bacterial cytotoxins mediate sepsis-induced platelet aggregation in the liver. Representative 2-photon images of C57Bl/6 mice 6–8 hours after sepsis with (A) S. aureus LAC or LACΔhla, (B) P. aeruginosa PA99 or PA99ΔexoSTU, and (C) S. pneumoniae 6A or 6AΔply. Vasculature (red, Qdots655); platelets (green, GPIbβ). Scale bars: 20 μm. White arrows denote thrombi. (D) Quantification of the total area of platelet accumulation within the vasculature in mouse livers as treated in A–C. Data represent 5–7 FOV per mouse in 5–7 female mice per group and are presented as the mean ± SEM. Measurements for individual FOV within each mouse are displayed in Supplemental Figure 5, C–E. *P ≤ 0.05, **P ≤ 0.01, and ****P ≤ 0.0001, by nested t test for each treatment group.

Discussion

Interventional trials to mitigate sepsis-associated mortality have centered around agents that stabilize the endothelium, dampen inflammation, or curtail microvascular thrombosis (70–74). The failure of each of these clinical trials suggests that a universal therapy for sepsis is incongruent with the molecular heterogeneity of the host-pathogen interaction. Our study not only sheds light on the specific role of the Hla-ADAM10 interaction in endothelial injury in S. aureus sepsis, but, perhaps more importantly, illustrates that utilization of ADAM10 differentiates molecular pathways of disease among common human sepsis pathogens.

Multiple lines of evidence now indicate that the endothelial cell is a primary target of virulence factor–mediated injury in S. aureus sepsis and suggest that a temporal sequence of events unfolds in the pathogenesis of intravascular infection. S. aureus mutants deficient in bacterial adhesion and clumping demonstrate a severe defect in intravascular infection (75, 76), implicating the formation of a bacterial nidus within the microvasculature as a nucleating event that in turn may facilitate localized action of the staphylococcal PFTs on the endothelium. As a physiologic response to endothelial injury, platelet aggregation and focal leukocyte activation may then amplify the microvascular insult, resulting in injury to the tissues supplied by the afflicted vascular beds. This model is consistent with the finding that endothelium-specific knockout of DARC or ADAM10 alone affords protection against lethal sepsis, whereas a more modest effect of ADAM10 knockout on platelets and myeloid lineage is observed, requiring protection of both cell types to prevent mortality in experimental S. aureus sepsis (12, 21).

The use of cytotoxins is a highly conserved mechanism by which pathogens elicit host tissue injury. Although diverse in structure and mechanism of action, PFTs and membrane-associated cytotoxins cause endothelial barrier damage, inflammasome activation, alterations in vascular tone, and immune cell injury by manipulation of host signaling pathways (55, 64, 67, 68). As we observe discriminatory use of ADAM10 by the pathogens we examined, it will be essential to extend these studies toward an understanding of the precise molecular mechanisms by which ADAM10 engenders cytotoxin-mediated injury. There are several plausible mechanisms by which pathogen-specific dependence on ADAM10 may occur. ADAM10 exhibits inducible catalytic activity, which leads to metalloprotease-dependent cleavage of ectodomain-containing substrates including VE-cadherin within the vasculature (77). Both ADAM10 translocation to the cell surface and catalytic activation have been observed to be calcium dependent (34, 78). As multiple PFTs induce Ca2+ influx, including those expressed by GBS and C. albicans (62–64, 79), the induction of Ca2+ signaling alone is unlikely to be the singular mechanism by which ADAM10-dependent pathogens elicit microvascular injury. It is possible, however, that ADAM10-dependent pathogens target specific membrane microdomains and engender cellular signal transduction events dependent on ADAM10, or alternatively specify the cleavage of a distinct subset of ADAM10 substrates to amplify endovascular pathogenesis. Recent structural insights have illustrated that spatial context is pivotal in the selection of ADAM10 substrates for cleavage (80). The anatomic and functional heterogeneity of the endothelium between distinct vascular beds as well as within individual organs (81, 82) may thus contribute to site-specific ADAM10-dependent injury or cleavage events. To differentiate between these mechanisms, dedicated analyses of virulence factor expression and tropism of individual pathogens for biologically distinct sites within the vasculature, along with detailed analysis of ADAM10 activation and downstream signaling events, will need to be conducted.

Several limitations of mouse modeling systems may obscure a complete understanding of the role of ADAM10 in pathogen-specific outcomes in sepsis. First, the expression level of ADAM10 on the murine endothelium may be distinct in magnitude or vascular distribution relative to that in humans. The ADAM10 rs653765 promoter polymorphism appears to regulate protein expression, suggesting a mechanism by which the SNP may influence the outcome of human bacterial sepsis (32, 83). Additional studies will be needed to reveal whether the effects of this polymorphism in vivo stem solely from endothelial ADAM10 function or also depend on other cell types in which ADAM10 may contribute to sepsis pathogenesis. While we did not observe differences in sepsis outcomes in VE-Cad ADAM10–/– mice following infection with GBS or C. albicans, subtle differences may exist that exceed the sensitivity of detection in a mouse model system. Similarly, ADAM10 expression on other cell types may contribute to disease caused by GBS or C. albicans. Additional mechanistic studies of the role of ADAM10 in sepsis and the contribution of SNP-based regulation of ADAM10 expression in disease are needed.

Moreover, our findings suggest that further investigation of cytotoxin activity across a broader array of leading sepsis pathogens from the Enterobacteriaceae, Clostridiaceae, and Streptococcaceae families may expand our understanding of ADAM10 dependence in pathogenesis. This knowledge has several important implications for clinical disease. First, these studies provide a molecular basis to indicate that therapeutic targeting of host pathways in sepsis can be defined in a pathogen-specific manner. This type of “precision medicine” approach is not currently achievable with our current understanding of sepsis pathogenesis. The independent effects of genetic alteration of ADAM10 expression and ADAM10 inhibition on sepsis mortality and vascular injury highlight the potential use of small-molecule inhibitors as a novel host-targeted approach to modify disease. The use of active-site ADAM10 inhibitors such as GI254023X has shown promising preclinical results to improve sepsis (10, 19); however, the evaluation of these agents in humans remains limited by nonspecific inhibitory effects on ADAM17 and unfavorable toxicities with chronic use (84, 85). Newer compounds with improved selectivity for ADAM10 have shown promise in preclinical cancer models, with improved patient tolerance (84). In addition, highly specific anti-ADAM10 monoclonal antibodies have been shown to block ADAM10-specific substrate cleavage in vitro and in a mouse xenograft model (86, 87). The selectivity of these newer agents, coupled with short-term treatment needed for sepsis, may improve the therapeutic potential for this class of host-targeted interventions.

Our findings provide the rationale for pathogen-specific analysis of the ADAM10 rs653765G promoter SNP in individuals presenting with sepsis. While prior studies have been limited to analysis of sepsis severity across cohorts of patients with sepsis, a refinement of clinical investigation to include ADAM10 SNP typing for pathogen-specific analyses may be highly informative. The pairing of these human studies with mechanistic analyses in tractable animal models may in turn provide a foundation for clinical risk stratification in sepsis and facilitate therapeutic targeting of ADAM10.

Second, our studies lend support for further investigation of the role of antiplatelet agents in the management of sepsis, raising the possibility that this class of drugs may benefit individuals infected with pathogens that rely on endothelial ADAM10 for induction of microvascular thrombosis. Recent retrospective and matched cohort studies in humans with bacteremia or sepsis have provided evidence of improved clinical outcomes among patients already receiving antiplatelet therapy for management of cardiovascular disease (88, 89). Our studies involving pretreatment of mice with ticagrelor, a commonly prescribed FDA-approved antithrombotic drug, showed that platelet aggregation was prevented within the hepatic vasculature during S. aureus sepsis, similar to what we observed with VE-Cad ADAM10–/– mice. Pretreatment with ticagrelor also demonstrated a survival benefit in mice with S. aureus sepsis (28), which is not seen in platelet-specific ADAM10-knockout mice (12), suggesting that the effects of ticagrelor were broadly protective against the multiple mechanisms by which S. aureus mediates platelet injury (30, 90). Despite our data showing that ticagrelor did not protect against endothelial vWF extrusion or VE-cadherin cleavage in vitro, ticagrelor treatment both in vitro and in vivo attenuated tissue factor expression, suggesting that ticagrelor may have other endothelial-specific antithrombotic properties (91). It is plausible that combination therapy achieving ADAM10 inhibition and antiplatelet activity may be particularly effective in the management of sepsis caused by those pathogens that elicit complex microvascular injury through an ADAM10-dependent mechanism.

The failures of clinical trials in sepsis over the past 30 years (70–74) have highlighted a need to reexamine patient stratification and sepsis treatments in clinical trials. Here, we define a pathogen-specific role of ADAM10 in sepsis, allowing us to begin to shift the paradigm from a single sepsis pathway toward an understanding of pathogen-defined pathways as the primary inciting event in cellular and tissue dysregulation. Understanding the precise molecular mechanisms by which specific pathogens exploit ADAM10 as a central pathway regulator is expected to support consideration of novel targeted therapeutics.

Methods

Animals. VE-Cad-Cre-ERT2–transgenic C57Bl/6 mice (43) were bred with Adam10loxP/loxP-transgenic C57Bl/6 mice to generate VE-Cad-Cre-ERT2 Adam10loxP/loxP mice (VE-Cad ADAM10–/–). VE-Cad-Cre-ERT2 Adam10+/+ mice were used as controls. Mice were genotyped using genomic DNA from the ear. The presence of VE-Cad-Cre-ERT2 in mice was detected by PCR as previously described (43). Adam10loxP/loxP was detected by PCR as previously detailed (19). Endothelium-specific knockout was induced by i.p. injection of 4- to 5-week-old mice with 2 mg TAM (MilliporeSigma, T5648) daily over 5 consecutive days. Both WT and VE-Cad ADAM10–/– mice received TAM injections. ADAM10 myeloid lineage–knockout mice (LysM ADAM10–/–) (20) and platelet-specific knockout mice (PF4 ADAM10–/–) (12) have been previously described. Mice were housed under a 12-hour light/12-hour dark cycle with ad libitum access to food and water in a specified pathogen–free facility.

Arterial vessel whole-mount and immunofluorescence. Following euthanasia, the descending thoracic aorta and mesenteric arteries were excised from 7-week-old VE-Cad ADAM10–/– and age-matched control mice that had been flushed with PBS, cut open longitudinally, and placed in PBS. Vessels were then incubated in blocking buffer (PBS with 3% BSA, 1% fish gelatin, 0.5% Triton X-100) for 1 hour followed by a primary anti–mouse Adam10 ectodomain antibody (5 μg/mL, R&D Systems, AB946) at 4°C overnight and then a secondary antibody, Alexa Fluor 594 donkey anti-goat (1:500, Life Technologies, Thermo Fisher Scientific, A11058) for 1 hour at room temperature. DAPI (1:2,000, Thermo Fisher Scientific, 62248) was used for nuclear labeling. Vessels were mounted on a glass slide with ProLong Gold Antifade Reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and cured overnight. Z-stack images of the endothelial cell layer were obtained with a FV1000 Olympus Confocal microscope and FV10-ASW 3.0 software at ×60 magnification. Using ImageJ-Fiji (NIH) and a LungJ plugin (92), a maximum intensity image was created from the Z-stack, and fluorescence was measured by mean red pixel intensity. Statistical analysis was done taking the average of different regions of the arteries per mouse with 3 mice per group.

Microbial strains and culturing. The S. aureus strains USA300 LAC and LAC hla:erm (LACΔhla) (93) were inoculated directly from frozen stock into tryptic soy broth (TSB) medium and grown overnight at 37°C while shaking. The P. aeruginosa strains PA99 and PA99ΔexoSTU (69) were streaked from frozen cultures onto Luria-Bertani (LB) agar. A single colony was grown in MINS medium (25 mM KH2PO4, 95 mM NH4Cl, 50 mM monosodium glutamate, 110 μM disodium succinate, 10 mM trisodium nitrilotriacetic acid, 2.5% glycerol, 5 mM MgSO4, 18 μM FeSO4) at 37°C overnight with shaking. The S. pneumoniae strains P1547, serotype 6A (WT strain), and 2436 6AΔply strain (94) were streaked from frozen cultures onto a tryptic soy agar (TSA) blood agar plate. The GBS strain COH-1 was streaked from frozen cultures onto a TSA plate. A single colony was grown in Todd Hewitt broth (THB) medium at 37°C, standing overnight. The C. albicans strain SN425 was streaked from frozen cultures onto yeast extract peptone (YEP) agar. A single colony was grown overnight in YEP medium at 30°C with shaking.

Sepsis modeling. Animal experiments were carried out using 7- to 8-week-old age- and weight-matched female and male mice. For survival studies, a murine sepsis score system was used to monitor the mice on the basis of their appearance, level of consciousness, activity, and response to stimuli (Supplemental Table 1). Mice were anesthetized prior to infection with ketamine and xylazine or isoflurane inhaled gas.

For infection experiments, S. aureus LAC was subcultured without antibiotics, and S. aureus LACΔhla was subcultured in the presence of 100 μg/mL erythromycin until the exponential phase (OD600, 0.5), washed once with PBS, and resuspended in PBS to deliver an inoculum of 0.8 to 1 × 108 bacteria/100 μL via retro-orbital i.v. injection for lethal infections and 5 × 107 bacteria/100 μL for sublethal infections. Purified recombinant Hla was resuspended in PBS to deliver an inoculum of 2.5–3 μg per mouse via retro-orbital i.v. injection for lethal infection. P. aeruginosa was subcultured in fresh MINS medium, regrown to the exponential phase, and resuspended in PBS to deliver an inoculum of approximately 3 × 107 bacteria/100 μL via i.p. injection. S. pneumoniae entire lawn from TSA blood agar plate was grown in TSB at 37°C with 5% CO2 until the exponential phase (OD620, 1.0), washed once with PBS, and resuspended in PBS to deliver an inoculum of 2 × 102 to 4 × 102 bacteria/100 μL via retro-orbital i.v. injection. GBS was subcultured into fresh THB medium, regrown to the exponential phase (OD600, 0.4), and resuspended in PBS to deliver an inoculum of 1 × 108 to 3 × 108 bacteria/100 μL via retro-orbital i.v. injection. C. albicans was subcultured into fresh YEP medium and regrown for 4 hours to the log phase. Cells were washed twice in PBS and then counted with a hemocytometer to determine cell numbers for the inoculum. The culture was resuspended to deliver an inoculum of 1 × 105 cells/100 μL via i.v. injection.

Tissue and blood analysis. Lungs perfused via the right ventricle with 4 mL PBS, or liver, heart, kidney, and spleen tissues were homogenized in 1 mL PBS with 1.0 glass/silica bead mix using bead beater homogenizer for CFU enumeration by serial dilution plating or by ELISA for cytokine analysis. Blood CFU were analyzed from whole blood following cardiac puncture by serial dilution plating. For histopathologic studies, H&E staining was performed on 10% neutral buffered formalin–fixed tissues. Blood was collected in a heparinized syringe (or an acid citrate dextrose–coated syringe for platelet counts) by cardiac puncture. Samples were centrifuged for the retrieval of plasma. Alanine transaminase (ALT) levels in plasma and the platelet count in whole blood were analyzed by Washington University in St. Louis Division of Comparative Medicine Research Animal Diagnostic Laboratory. IL-10 and IL-1β levels were analyzed using commercial ELISA kits according to the manufacturer’s protocols (R&D Systems).

In vivo imaging. Mice were infected as described above. At designated time points after infection, in vivo 2-photon imaging of liver was performed using a video-rate 2-photon microscope with a custom imaging chamber as previously described (95). Briefly, mice were anesthetized with isoflurane, and the liver was surgically exposed with an incision running along the base of the rib cage. A single liver lobe was carefully attached to a coverslip using VetBond (3M). A 7 μL mixture of DyLight 488 anti–mouse GPIbβ (70 μL, Emfret Analytics, X488) or FITC polyconal anti-vWF (Emfret Analytics, P150-1) and Q-tracker 655 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Q2102MP) was injected retro-orbitally to label platelet aggregates or vWF deposits and blood vessels, respectively. The mouse was positioned in the imaging chamber so that the liver lobe was visible through the cover glass in the upper plate. The upper plate was lowered until contact was made with the liver. Both upper and lower plates were warmed using a Warner Dual Channel temperature controller to maintain core body temperature. Perfusion of hepatic vessels was confirmed by reflected light microscopy and then monitored by observing Q-tracker flow during 2-photon imaging. Fluorescence was excited with a Chameleon Vision II Ti:Sapphire laser (Coherent) tuned to 900 nm and 480 nm; 560 nm and 635 nm emission filters were used to detect collagen in blue (<480 nm), platelets or vWF in green (480–560 nm), and blood vessels in red (>635 nm). To document vessel flow and aggregation dynamics, we streamed 250 full-frame images (512 × 512, 0.8 pixels/μm) at 10 frames/s with a 3-frame average. For each animal, platelet aggregates or vWF deposits were analyzed in 5–7 fields of view (FOV) selected at random. All videos and images were processed using Imaris, version 9.8 (Bitplane). Imaris software was used to quantify the accumulation of platelet aggregates or vWF deposits using surface tools and measuring the total area.

In vivo inhibitor studies. The platelet inhibitor ticagrelor (4 mg/kg) or vehicle (1× PBS) was delivered by oral gavage every 12 hours for 24 hours and immediately before infection. The ADAM10 inhibitor GI254023X (synthesized by Okeanos Technologies) (200 mg/kg/day) or vehicle (0.1 M carbonate buffer) was delivered i.p. every 12 hours for 3 days and immediately before infection. Six to 8 hours after infection, mice were imaged as above to assess platelet aggregation.

Endothelial cell analysis. HPAECs from Lonza were cultured in EGM-2 media (Lonza). Cells were pretreated with 20 μM ticagrelor (MilliporeSigma), 20 μM GI254023X (synthesized by Okeanos Technologies), or vehicle control (DMSO) for 16–18 hours prior to the experiment. A metalloprotease assay was performed by plating 2 × 104 HPAECs in a 96-well plate 48 hours prior to experimentation. Cells were treated with 5 μg/mL Hla in unsupplemented media for 10 minutes, washed with metalloprotease buffer (50 mM Tris, 150 mM NaCl, 10 mM CaCl2), and incubated at 37°C with 10 μM ADAM10-specific fluorogenic peptide substrate II (BioZyme) for 30 minutes. Fluorescence intensity was read on a TECAN plate reader. For the cytotoxicity assay, HPAECs were exposed to 5 μg/mL Hla for 3 hours in unsupplemented media, and LDH release was measured using a cytotoxicity detection kit (Roche) according to the manufacturer’s protocol and read with a TECAN plate reader. For immunofluorescence, 2.5 × 104 HPAECs were plated on IBIDI μ-Slide 8-well chamber slides and allowed to adhere for 72 hours. Cells were exposed to Hla (5 μg/mL) for 20 minutes and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde. Cells were stained with an anti-vWF antibody (1:500, Dako, A0082) at room temperature for 1 hour or permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 and stained with anti–VE-cadherin (1:100, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, F-8 SC-9989) at 4°C overnight. Following staining with an Alexa Fluor 594– or 488–conjugated secondary antibody, cells were visualized on a Zeiss Cell Observer inverted microscope with a color camera.

Statistics. Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 8 (GraphPad Software). A log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test was used to compare survival curves, a 2-tailed, paired Student’s t test was used to compare 2 groups, a nested t test or nested 1-way ANOVA was used to compare platelet aggregates and vWF measurements between the control and treatment groups for in vivo imaging, and a 1-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple-comparison test was applied to determine the differences among 3 or more groups. The results were considered statistically significant at a P value of 0.05 or less.

Study approval. All animals in this study were housed according to Washington University in St. Louis IACUC guidelines, and all experimental procedures were approved by the IACUC of Washington University in St. Louis (protocol 19-1035).

Data availability. Values for all data points in graphs are reported in the Supplemental Supporting Data Values file.

Author contributions

DNA and JBW designed and supervised the research. DNA performed the experiments and analyzed the data. DNA and MJM performed the 2-photon in vivo imaging. DNA and JBW wrote the manuscript.

Supplemental material

View Supplemental data

View Supplemental video 1

View Supplemental video 2

View Supporting data values

Acknowledgments

We thank Luisa Iruela-Arispe (Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA) for the generation and provision of VE-Cad-Cre-ERT2–transgenic C57Bl/6 mice. We thank Kelly Tomaszewski and Meagan Blanchard for help with mouse line generation and colony management. We thank Carmen M. Halabi and Michelle Lin at Washington University School of Medicine for assistance with mouse vessel isolation. We thank the Washington University School of Medicine In Vivo Imaging Core for 2-photon imaging support and Bas Surewaard at the University of Calgary (Calgary, Alberta, Canada) for assistance with the preliminary mouse liver imaging setup. We thank Alan Hauser (Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA) for the P. aeruginosa Pa99 strains; Jeffery N. Weiser (NYU, New York, New York, USA) for the S. pneumoniae P1547 and P2436 strains; Victor Nizet (UCSD, San Diego, California, USA) for the GBS COH-1 strain; and Suzanne Noble (UCSF, San Francisco, California, USA) for the C. albicans SN425 strain. The Graphical Abstract was created with BioRender.com. This work was supported by NIH grants R01AI097434 (to JBW), R21HD092948 (to JBW), and R01AI077600 (to MJM). DNA holds a Dean’s Scholars Award from the Washington University Division of Physician-Scientists, which is funded by a Burroughs Wellcome Fund Physician-Scientist Institutional Award.

Address correspondence to: Juliane Bubeck Wardenburg, 660 S. Euclid Ave, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA. Phone: 1.314.286.1747; Email: jbubeck@wustl.edu.

Footnotes

Conflict of interest: JBW has a financial agreement with Aridis Pharmaceuticals related to patents owned by the University of Chicago, and may receive royalty income based on technology that is currently owned by Washington University and subject to licensing by Forward Defense, LLC. DA and JBW have a new provisional patent for IP owned by Washington University School of Medicine (US patent no. 63/587,716).

Copyright: © 2023, Alfano et al. This is an open access article published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Reference information: J Clin Invest. 2023;133(23):e168450.https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI168450.

References
  1. Rudd KE, et al. Global, regional, and national sepsis incidence and mortality, 1990-2017: analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet. 2020;395(10219):200–211.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  2. Torio C, Moore B. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Statistical Briefs. NIH; 2006.
  3. Singer M, et al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016;315(8):801–810.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  4. Cohen J, et al. Sepsis: a roadmap for future research. Lancet Infect Dis. 2015;15(5):581–614.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  5. Collaborators GAR. Global mortality associated with 33 bacterial pathogens in 2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet. 2019;2019(10369):2221–2248.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  6. Kern WV, Rieg S. Burden of bacterial bloodstream infection-a brief update on epidemiology and significance of multidrug-resistant pathogens. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2020;26(2):151–157.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  7. Powers ME, Bubeck Wardenburg J. Igniting the fire: Staphylococcus aureus virulence factors in the pathogenesis of sepsis. PLoS Pathog. 2014;10(2):e1003871.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  8. Kwiecinski JM, Horswill AR. Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections: pathogenesis and regulatory mechanisms. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2020;53:51–60.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  9. Adhikari RP, et al. Novel structurally designed vaccine for S. aureus α-hemolysin: protection against bacteremia and pneumonia. PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e38567.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  10. Powers ME, et al. ADAM10 mediates vascular injury induced by Staphylococcus aureus α-hemolysin. J Infect Dis. 2012;206(3):352–356.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  11. Karauzum H, et al. Structurally designed attenuated subunit vaccines for S. aureus LukS-PV and LukF-PV confer protection in a mouse bacteremia model. PLoS One. 2013;8(6):e65384.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  12. Powers ME, et al. Synergistic action of Staphylococcus aureus α-toxin on platelets and myeloid lineage cells contributes to lethal sepsis. Cell Host Microbe. 2015;17(6):775–787.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  13. Karauzum H, et al. Vaccine display on artificial bacterial spores enhances protective efficacy against Staphylococcus aureus infection. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2018;365(18):fny190.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  14. Lubkin A, et al. Staphylococcus aureus leukocidins target endothelial DARC to cause lethality in mice. Cell Host Microbe. 2019;25(3):463–470.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  15. Tam K, et al. Targeting leukocidin-mediated immune evasion protects mice from Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. J Exp Med. 2020;217(9):e20190541.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  16. Buckley PT, et al. Multivalent human antibody-centyrin fusion protein to prevent and treat Staphylococcus aureus infections. Cell Host Microbe. 2023;31(5):751–765.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  17. Spaan AN, et al. Leukocidins: staphylococcal bi-component pore-forming toxins find their receptors. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2017;15(7):435–447.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  18. Wilke GA, Bubeck Wardenburg J. Role of a disintegrin and metalloprotease 10 in Staphylococcus aureus alpha-hemolysin-mediated cellular injury. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(30):13473–13478.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  19. Inoshima I, et al. A Staphylococcus aureus pore-forming toxin subverts the activity of ADAM10 to cause lethal infection in mice. Nat Med. 2011;17(10):1310–1314.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  20. Becker RE, et al. Tissue-specific patterning of host innate immune responses by Staphylococcus aureus α-toxin. J Innate Immun. 2014;6(5):619–631.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  21. Surewaard BGJ, et al. α-Toxin induces platelet aggregation and liver injury during Staphylococcus aureus sepsis. Cell Host Microbe. 2018;24(2):271–284.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  22. Engelmann B, Massberg S. Thrombosis as an intravascular effector of innate immunity. Nat Rev Immunol. 2013;13(1):34–45.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  23. Yeaman MR. Platelets: at the nexus of antimicrobial defence. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2014;12(6):426–437.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  24. Gogos CA, et al. Pro- versus anti-inflammatory cytokine profile in patients with severe sepsis: a marker for prognosis and future therapeutic options. J Infect Dis. 2000;181(1):176–180.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  25. Rose WE, et al. Elevated serum interleukin-10 at time of hospital admission is predictive of mortality in patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. J Infect Dis. 2012;206(10):1604–1611.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  26. Minejima E, et al. A dysregulated balance of proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory host cytokine response early during therapy predicts persistence and mortality in staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Crit Care Med. 2016;44(4):671–679.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  27. Alhurayri F, et al. Increased risk of thrombocytopenia and death in patients with bacteremia caused by high alpha toxin-producing methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Toxins (Basel). 2021;13(10):726.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  28. Sun J, et al. Repurposed drugs block toxin-driven platelet clearance by the hepatic Ashwell-Morell receptor to clear Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Sci Transl Med. 2021;13(586):eabd6737.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  29. Butt JH, et al. Ticagrelor and the risk of Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia and other infections. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2022;8(1):13–19.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  30. Tatara AM, et al. Antiplatelet therapy for staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: will it stick? PLoS Pathog. 2022;18(2):e1010240.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  31. Joffre J, et al. Endothelial responses in sepsis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020;202(3):361–370.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  32. Cui L, et al. An ADAM10 promoter polymorphism is a functional variant in severe sepsis patients and confers susceptibility to the development of sepsis. Crit Care. 2015;19(1):73.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  33. Zhang C, et al. Adam10 is essential for early embryonic cardiovascular development. Dev Dyn. 2010;239(10):2594–2602.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  34. Nagano O, et al. Cell-matrix interaction via CD44 is independently regulated by different metalloproteinases activated in response to extracellular Ca(2+) influx and PKC activation. J Cell Biol. 2004;165(6):893–902.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  35. Donners MM, et al. A disintegrin and metalloprotease 10 is a novel mediator of vascular endothelial growth factor-induced endothelial cell function in angiogenesis and is associated with atherosclerosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2010;30(11):2188–2195.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  36. Jiang J, et al. Ectodomain shedding and autocleavage of the cardiac membrane protease corin. J Biol Chem. 2011;286(12):10066–10072.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  37. Anand-Apte B, et al. Betacellulin induces increased retinal vascular permeability in mice. PLoS One. 2010;5(10):e13444.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  38. Sahin U, et al. Distinct roles for ADAM10 and ADAM17 in ectodomain shedding of six EGFR ligands. J Cell Biol. 2004;164(5):769–779.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  39. Janes PW, et al. Adam meets Eph: an ADAM substrate recognition module acts as a molecular switch for ephrin cleavage in trans. Cell. 2005;123(2):291–304.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  40. Hartmann D, et al. The disintegrin/metalloprotease ADAM 10 is essential for Notch signalling but not for alpha-secretase activity in fibroblasts. Hum Mol Genet. 2002;11(21):2615–2624.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  41. Alabi RO, et al. ADAM10-dependent signaling through notch1 and notch4 controls development of organ-specific vascular beds. Circ Res. 2016;119(4):519–531.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  42. Glomski K, et al. Deletion of Adam10 in endothelial cells leads to defects in organ-specific vascular structures. Blood. 2011;118(4):1163–1174.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  43. Monvoisin A, et al. VE-cadherin-CreERT2 transgenic mouse: a model for inducible recombination in the endothelium. Dev Dyn. 2006;235(12):3413–3422.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  44. Tan K, et al. Cytokine measurements add value to clinical variables in predicting outcomes for Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. BMC Infect Dis. 2021;21(1):317.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  45. De Backer D, et al. Pathophysiology of microcirculatory dysfunction and the pathogenesis of septic shock. Virulence. 2014;5(1):73–79.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  46. Greco E, et al. Platelets and multi-organ failure in sepsis. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18(10):2200.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  47. Mansour A, et al. P2Y12 inhibition beyond thrombosis: effects on inflammation. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(4):1391.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  48. Ruggeri ZM. Structure of von Willebrand factor and its function in platelet adhesion and thrombus formation. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol. 2001;14(2):257–279.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  49. Hirst RA, et al. The role of pneumolysin in pneumococcal pneumonia and meningitis. Clin Exp Immunol. 2004;138(2):195–201.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  50. Rubins JB, et al. Pneumolysin activates phospholipase A in pulmonary artery endothelial cells. Infect Immun. 1994;62(9):3829–3836.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  51. Luttge M, et al. Streptococcus pneumoniae induces exocytosis of Weibel-Palade bodies in pulmonary endothelial cells. Cell Microbiol. 2012;14(2):210–225.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  52. Reboud E, et al. Pseudomonas aeruginosa ExlA and Serratia marcescens ShlA trigger cadherin cleavage by promoting calcium influx and ADAM10 activation. PLoS Pathog. 2017;13(8):e1006579.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  53. Golovkine G, et al. VE-cadherin cleavage by LasB protease from Pseudomonas aeruginosa facilitates type III secretion system toxicity in endothelial cells. PLoS Pathog. 2014;10(3):e1003939.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  54. Lubkin A, Torres VJ. Bacteria and endothelial cells: a toxic relationship. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2017;35:58–63.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  55. Wood SJ, et al. Pseudomonas aeruginosa cytotoxins: mechanisms of cytotoxicity and impact on inflammatory responses. Cells. 2023;12(1):195.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  56. Freitas C, et al. The infection of microvascular endothelial cells with ExoU-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa triggers the release of von Willebrand factor and platelet adhesion. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2012;107(6):728–734.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  57. Elsen S, et al. A type III secretion negative clinical strain of Pseudomonas aeruginosa employs a two-partner secreted exolysin to induce hemorrhagic pneumonia. Cell Host Microbe. 2014;15(2):164–176.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  58. Reboud E, et al. Phenotype and toxicity of the recently discovered exlA-positive Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains collected worldwide. Environ Microbiol. 2016;18(10):3425–3439.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  59. Mayr FB, et al. Epidemiology of severe sepsis. Virulence. 2014;5(1):4–11.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  60. Hartman ME, et al. Trends in the epidemiology of pediatric severe sepsis*. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2013;14(7):686–693.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  61. Armistead B, et al. Hemolytic membrane vesicles of group B streptococcus promote infection. J Infect Dis. 2021;223(8):1488–1496.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  62. Naglik JR, et al. Candidalysin: discovery and function in Candida albicans infections. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2019;52:100–109.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  63. Russell CM, et al. The Candida albicans virulence factor candidalysin polymerizes in solution to form membrane pores and damage epithelial cells. Elife. 2022;11:e75490.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  64. Los FC, et al. Role of pore-forming toxins in bacterial infectious diseases. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2013;77(2):173–207.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  65. Gibson RL, et al. Group B streptococcal beta-hemolysin promotes injury of lung microvascular endothelial cells. Pediatr Res. 1999;45(5 pt 1):626–634.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  66. Swidergall M, et al. Candidalysin is required for neutrophil recruitment and virulence during systemic Candida albicans infection. J Infect Dis. 2019;220(9):1477–1488.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  67. Li Y, et al. Structural basis of the pore-forming toxin/membrane interaction. Toxins (Basel). 2021;13(2):128.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  68. Ulhuq FR, Mariano G. Bacterial pore-forming toxins. Microbiology (Reading). 2022;168(3):001154.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  69. Shaver CM, Hauser AR. Relative contributions of Pseudomonas aeruginosa ExoU, ExoS, and ExoT to virulence in the lung. Infect Immun. 2004;72(12):6969–6977.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  70. Tse MT. Trial watch: sepsis study failure highlights need for trial design rethink. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2013;12(5):334.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  71. Marshall JC. Why have clinical trials in sepsis failed? Trends Mol Med. 2014;20(4):195–203.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  72. Fink MP. Animal models of sepsis. Virulence. 2014;5(1):143–153.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  73. Lakshmikanth CL, et al. Sepsis: in search of cure. Inflamm Res. 2016;65(8):587–602.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  74. Cavaillon JM, et al. Sepsis therapies: learning from 30 years of failure of translational research to propose new leads. EMBO Mol Med. 2020;12(4):e10128.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  75. McAdow M, et al. Preventing Staphylococcus aureus sepsis through the inhibition of its agglutination in blood. PLoS Pathog. 2011;7(10):e1002307.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  76. Flick MJ, et al. Genetic elimination of the binding motif on fibrinogen for the S. aureus virulence factor ClfA improves host survival in septicemia. Blood. 2013;121(10):1783–1794.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  77. Dreymueller D, et al. ADAM-family metalloproteinases in lung inflammation: potential therapeutic targets. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2015;308(4):L325–L343.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  78. Bouillot S, et al. Functional consequences of calcium influx promoted by bacterial pore-forming toxins. Toxins (Basel). 2018;10(10):387.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  79. Rosa-Fraile M, et al. Group B streptococcal haemolysin and pigment, a tale of twins. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2014;38(5):932–946.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  80. Lipper CH, et al. Structural basis for membrane-proximal proteolysis of substrates by ADAM10. Cell. 2023;186(17):3632–3641.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  81. Chang JC. Sepsis and septic shock: endothelial molecular pathogenesis associated with vascular microthrombotic disease. Thromb J. 2019;17:10.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  82. Toledo AG, et al. Proteomic atlas of organ vasculopathies triggered by Staphylococcus aureus sepsis. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):4656.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  83. Chen F, et al. A functional polymorphism-mediated disruption of EGR1/ADAM10 pathway confers the risk of sepsis progression. mBio. 2019;10(4):e01663-19.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  84. Wetzel S, et al. The metalloproteinase ADAM10: a useful therapeutic target? Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Res. 2017;1864(11 pt b):2071–2081.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  85. Smith TM, et al. Targeting ADAM10 in cancer and autoimmunity. Front Immunol. 2020;11:499.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  86. Atapattu L, et al. Antibodies binding the ADAM10 substrate recognition domain inhibit Eph function. J Cell Sci. 2012;125(pt 24):6084–6093.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  87. Atapattu L, et al. An activated form of ADAM10 is tumor selective and regulates cancer stem-like cells and tumor growth. J Exp Med. 2016;213(9):1741–1757.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  88. Lupu L, et al. Effect of ticagrelor on reducing the risk of gram-positive infections in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Am J Cardiol. 2020;130:56–63.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  89. Vicent L, et al. Ticagrelor and infection risk in patients with coronary artery disease. Cardiology. 2021;146(6):698–704.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  90. Hamzeh-Cognasse H, et al. Platelets and infections — complex interactions with bacteria. Front Immunol. 2015;6:82.
    View this article via: CrossRef Google Scholar
  91. Hamilos M, et al. Interaction between platelets and endothelium: from pathophysiology to new therapeutic options. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2018;8(5):568–580.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  92. Wollatz L, et al. 3D histopathology—a lung tissue segmentation workflow for microfocus x-ray-computed tomography scans. J Digit Imaging. 2017;30(6):772–781.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  93. Sampedro GR, et al. Targeting Staphylococcus aureus α-toxin as a novel approach to reduce severity of recurrent skin and soft-tissue infections. J Infect Dis. 2014;210(7):1012–1018.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  94. Roche AM, et al. Live attenuated Streptococcus pneumoniae strains induce serotype-independent mucosal and systemic protection in mice. Infect Immun. 2007;75(5):2469–2475.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  95. Zinselmeyer BH, et al. Chapter 16. Two-photon microscopy and multidimensional analysis of cell dynamics. Methods Enzymol. 2009;461:349–378.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Version history
  • Version 1 (October 3, 2023): In-Press Preview
  • Version 2 (December 1, 2023): Electronic publication

Article tools

  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal

Metrics

  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article

Go to

  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Methods
  • Author contributions
  • Supplemental material
  • Acknowledgments
  • Footnotes
  • References
  • Version history
Advertisement
Advertisement

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts