Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Pancreatic Cancer (Jul 2025)
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • Sex Differences in Medicine (Sep 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Carcinogen exposure enhances cancer immunogenicity by blocking the development of an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment
Mei Huang, … , Marjan Azin, Shadmehr Demehri
Mei Huang, … , Marjan Azin, Shadmehr Demehri
Published October 16, 2023
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 2023;133(20):e166494. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI166494.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Oncology

Carcinogen exposure enhances cancer immunogenicity by blocking the development of an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Carcinogen exposure is strongly associated with enhanced cancer immunogenicity. Increased tumor mutational burden and resulting neoantigen generation have been proposed to link carcinogen exposure and cancer immunogenicity. However, the neoantigen-independent immunological impact of carcinogen exposure on cancer is unknown. Here, we demonstrate that chemical carcinogen-exposed cancer cells fail to establish an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME), resulting in their T cell–mediated rejection in vivo. A chemical carcinogen-treated breast cancer cell clone that lacked any additional coding region mutations (i.e., neoantigen) was rejected in mice in a T cell–dependent manner. Strikingly, the coinjection of carcinogen- and control-treated cancer cells prevented this rejection, suggesting that the loss of immunosuppressive TME was the dominant cause of rejection. Reduced M-CSF expression by carcinogen-treated cancer cells significantly suppressed tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) and resulted in the loss of an immunosuppressive TME. Single-cell analysis of human lung cancers revealed a significant reduction in the immunosuppressive TAMs in former smokers compared with individuals who had never smoked. These findings demonstrate that carcinogen exposure impairs the development of an immunosuppressive TME and indicate a novel link between carcinogens and cancer immunogenicity.

Authors

Mei Huang, Yun Xia, Kaiwen Li, Feng Shao, Zhaoyi Feng, Tiancheng Li, Marjan Azin, Shadmehr Demehri

×

Figure 5

Carcinogen-induced immunogenicity is dependent on reduced M-CSF and CD155 expression by cancer cells.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Carcinogen-induced immunogenicity is dependent on reduced M-CSF and CD15...
(A) Cytokine array on supernatant from DMBA3-4 and DMSO3-1 cells. Red and blue boxes indicate the upregulated and downregulated proteins secreted by DMBA3-4 compared with DMSO3-1 cells, respectively. (B) Relative levels of the select upregulated and downregulated proteins from the DMBA3-4/DMSO3-1 cytokine array (n=2 per group). (C) M-CSF protein levels in DMBA3-4 compared with DMSO3-1 cell lysates (n = 9 per group). (D) Csf1 mRNA expression levels in DMBA3-4 compared with DMSO3-1 cells (n = 7 per group). (E) BMDM migration toward DMBA3-4 versus DMSO3-1 cells in the presence of anti-CSF1R or IgG control antibody. Fold change is determined as the ratio of BMDM migration in the absence of tumor cells at 96 hours after coculture (n=7 per group). (F) CD155, CD112, PD-L1 and PD-L2 expression on DMBA3-4 and DMSO3-1 cells. Numbers on the flow histograms represent the ligands’ MFI. (G) DMBA3-4 plus DMSO3-1 mixed tumor growth in WT mice treated with anti-TIGIT and/or anti-CSF1R antibody compared with IgG-treated controls (n = 10 per group). Mice received 450,000 DMBA3-4 plus 50,000 DMSO3-1 cells per injection site. (H) Survival rate of WT mice that received DMBA3-4 plus DMSO3-1 cells and treated with anti-TIGIT and/or anti-CSF1R antibody compared with IgG-treated controls (n = 10 per group). Unpaired t test (C–E), 2-way ANOVA (G) and log-rank test (H), bar graphs show mean ± SD.

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts