Advertisement
Commentary Free access | 10.1172/JCI150790
1Integrated Research Center for Fetal Medicine, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
2Laboratory of Molecular and Genomic Endocrinology, Sidra Medicine, Doha, Qatar.
3Division of Reproductive Sciences, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Address correspondence to: James Segars, Ross Building, Room 624, 720 Rutland Avenue, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA. Phone: 410.614.2000; Email: jsegars2@jhmi.edu.
Find articles by
Burd, I.
in:
JCI
|
PubMed
|
Google Scholar
|
1Integrated Research Center for Fetal Medicine, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
2Laboratory of Molecular and Genomic Endocrinology, Sidra Medicine, Doha, Qatar.
3Division of Reproductive Sciences, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Address correspondence to: James Segars, Ross Building, Room 624, 720 Rutland Avenue, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA. Phone: 410.614.2000; Email: jsegars2@jhmi.edu.
Find articles by Kino, T. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Integrated Research Center for Fetal Medicine, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
2Laboratory of Molecular and Genomic Endocrinology, Sidra Medicine, Doha, Qatar.
3Division of Reproductive Sciences, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Address correspondence to: James Segars, Ross Building, Room 624, 720 Rutland Avenue, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA. Phone: 410.614.2000; Email: jsegars2@jhmi.edu.
Find articles by
Segars, J.
in:
JCI
|
PubMed
|
Google Scholar
|
Published June 8, 2021 - More info
BACKGROUND The significant risks posed to mothers and fetuses by COVID-19 in pregnancy have sparked a worldwide debate surrounding the pros and cons of antenatal SARS-CoV-2 inoculation, as we lack sufficient evidence regarding vaccine effectiveness in pregnant women and their offspring. We aimed to provide substantial evidence for the effect of the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine versus native infection on maternal humoral, as well as transplacentally acquired fetal immune response, potentially providing newborn protection.METHODS A multicenter study where parturients presenting for delivery were recruited at 8 medical centers across Israel and assigned to 3 study groups: vaccinated (n = 86); PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infected during pregnancy (n = 65), and unvaccinated noninfected controls (n = 62). Maternal and fetal blood samples were collected from parturients prior to delivery and from the umbilical cord following delivery, respectively. Sera IgG and IgM titers were measured using the Milliplex MAP SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Panel (for S1, S2, RBD, and N).RESULTS The BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine elicits strong maternal humoral IgG response (anti-S and RBD) that crosses the placenta barrier and approaches maternal titers in the fetus within 15 days following the first dose. Maternal to neonatal anti-COVID-19 antibodies ratio did not differ when comparing sensitization (vaccine vs. infection). IgG transfer ratio at birth was significantly lower for third-trimester as compared with second trimester infection. Lastly, fetal IgM response was detected in 5 neonates, all in the infected group.CONCLUSION Antenatal BNT162b2 mRNA vaccination induces a robust maternal humoral response that effectively transfers to the fetus, supporting the role of vaccination during pregnancy.FUNDING Israel Science Foundation and the Weizmann Institute Fondazione Henry Krenter.
Ofer Beharier, Romina Plitman Mayo, Tal Raz, Kira Nahum Sacks, Letizia Schreiber, Yael Suissa-Cohen, Rony Chen, Rachel Gomez-Tolub, Eran Hadar, Rinat Gabbay-Benziv, Yuval Jaffe Moshkovich, Tal Biron-Shental, Gil Shechter-Maor, Sivan Farladansky-Gershnabel, Hen Yitzhak Sela, Hedi Benyamini-Raischer, Nitzan D. Sela, Debra Goldman-Wohl, Ziv Shulman, Ariel Many, Haim Barr, Simcha Yagel, Michal Neeman, Michal Kovo
Pregnant patients with COVID-19 are more likely to require intensive care and die compared with noninfected pregnant women. While the consequences of COVID-19 disease in pregnancy prompted many health care organizations to support vaccination in pregnancy, vaccine effects for mother and infant remained unclear. In this issue of the JCI, Beharier and Mayo et al. explored maternal and neonatal responses to the Pfizer BNT162b2 SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine. The authors examined blood samples from women and cord blood of neonates following childbirth. Samples were stratified into three groups: vaccine recipients, unvaccinated participants with past positive SARS-CoV-2 test, and unvaccinated participants without prior infection. Vaccinated mothers and mothers with previous infection generated and transferred protective IgG antibodies across the placenta. This study provides evidence to support the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccination in pregnancy with protection to the neonate against infection, outlining clear vaccine benefits for both maternal and child health.
Pregnancy is a state of altered immunity and endocrine function to permit the successful gestation and delivery of a semi-allogeneic fetus. This shift in the immune and endocrine states during pregnancy promotes a vulnerability to severe complications caused by infectious agents, including SARS-CoV-2 infection. Specifically, pregnant patients are three-fold more likely to be admitted to an intensive care unit, to receive ventilator support or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and die compared with noninfected pregnant women (1, 2). Additionally, obstetrical complications, in particular preterm birth (2, 3), are also more likely to occur if the mother is infected with SARS-CoV-2, thus increasing the possibility of long-term health problems for both the mother and the neonate.
Because of the novelty and associated uncertain efficacy of the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, pregnancy was an exclusion criterion from clinical trials of these vaccines. Given the grave consequences of COVID-19 disease in pregnancy, many health care societies and governmental organizations began to advocate for administration of the vaccine in pregnancy for the health of pregnant patients and their unborn children. In the United States, the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM), the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM) supported vaccination, in accordance with the Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices of the US Centers for Disease Prevention and Control (CDC). Weighing the known risks and benefits and considering possible unknown risks based on a deep understanding of the physiologic immune and endocrine shifts of pregnancy, the various committees and their task force members awaited more data, understanding that the emergency use authorization (EUA) issued by the FDA permitted vaccination of pregnant and breastfeeding individuals erstwhile requiring that the company conduct postauthorization observational studies in pregnancy (4). Current evidence indicates that COVID-19 vaccines do not precipitate infertility in women or men, and while administered in pregnancy, the vaccinated mRNA fragment does not cross the placenta, being consumed by muscle cells at the site of injection and degraded after the encoded protein is synthesized (5–7). However, though reassuring, data pertaining to pregnancy and neonatal transfer are still limited.
In this issue of the JCI, Beharier and Mayo et al. (8) provide much needed information regarding maternal and neonatal responses to the Pfizer BNT162b2 SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine in pregnancy, capitalizing on the unprecedented COVID-19 vaccination campaign in Israel, which included pregnant women. The investigators examined a cohort of 1094 participants from eight hospitals across Israel. Blood samples from women and cord blood of neonates following childbirth were collected between April 2020 and March 2021. Samples were stratified into three groups: 105 vaccine recipients (samples collected between January to March 2021), 94 unvaccinated participants with past positive results in SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR test, and 895 unvaccinated participants without prior documentation for infection. A positive PCR test was considered diagnostic of acute infection. The authors used multiplexed serological IgG and IgM responses to the S1 domain, S2 domain, receptor binding domain (RBD), and nucleocapsid (N) antigens in maternal and neonatal sera to identify the antiviral immunity induced by the vaccination and to determine the participants with a previous infection. A response to N (anti-N antibody) was present in SARS-CoV-2–infected subjects, but not in the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccinated. Conversely, a response to RBD (anti-RBD antibody) was present in both infected and vaccinated subjects.
There were several notable findings that expanded understanding of COVID-19 vaccination in pregnancy. The data showed a robust increase in maternal IgG humoral response against S1, S2, and RBD in noninfected patients upon vaccination. These immunoglobulins were readily transferred to the fetus across the placenta, leading to a substantial anti–SARS-CoV-2 antibody titer in the neonatal bloodstream within 14 days of the first vaccine dose. In addition, in women recovering from SARS-CoV-2 infection contracted in the second trimester (13–26 weeks of gestation), both maternal and cord blood anti–COVID-19 antibodies remained elevated at delivery. Overall, there was a high efficacy of the vaccination to generate protective antibodies (S1, S2, and RBD IgGs) in mothers and subsequent successful transfer with fetuses compared with natural infection (Figure 1 and ref. 8). IgG is the only antibody class that is actively transferred from the mother to the fetus across the placenta by an active transport, involving neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn), providing protection against SARS-CoV-2 to the newborn during the first months of life. In the 86 vaccinated deliveries, there was no evidence of fetal IgM response to any of the vaccine-induced antigens, indicating no evidence for direct exposure of the fetus to vaccine-derived antigens (8). We commend Beharier, Mayo, and colleagues for addressing the important question of COVID-19 vaccination and antibody transfer to the fetus.
Pfizer BNT162b2 vaccine in pregnancy provides maternal and neonatal benefits. Pregnant women with COVID-19 are three times more likely to suffer complications that may include ICU admission, ventilator requirements, or preterm birth. Beharier and Mayo et al. showed that mothers with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccinated mothers generate and transfer protective IgG antibodies across the placenta to the neonate (8).
As noted by Beharier, Mayo, and their co-authors, some patients were excluded, possibly including cases of acute infection in pregnancy. Also, the race and ethnicity were limited based on the population, and differences might be observed in other ethnicities (8). Future studies are urgently needed to address this point since race and ethnicity are known to increase the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes with SARS-CoV-2 infection (9).
One point not directly addressed by the authors is that FcRn receptor expression in the placenta is not constant during pregnancy (8). The expression of the FcRn receptor depends on gestational age and is highest at the end of pregnancy (10–12). In placenta, these receptors are mainly located on the syncytiotrophoblasts. At early stages of pregnancy, the continuous cytotrophoblast layer between syncytiotrophoblasts and stromal cells prevents penetration of the villi by IgG. After the fourth month of pregnancy, the cytotrophoblast layer becomes discontinuous, slowly disappearing through the remaining gestation, and exposes the syncytiotrophoblast cells to maternal blood vessels so that the active transport of IgG may begin. This fact suggests that vaccination in very early pregnancy might not transfer maternally generated protective antibodies to the fetus with an efficiency similar to vaccination later in pregnancy. In the view of the authors of this Commentary, however, this point does not detract from endorsement of vaccination at any time during gestation because vaccination in pregnancy confers separate benefits to the mother and the fetus. The health of both the fetus and mother must be considered. Because of the considerable burden of disease throughout pregnancy on the mother, vaccinations at any time of gestation should be strongly considered for the benefit of maternal health.
Conflict of interest: The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.
Copyright: © 2021, American Society for Clinical Investigation.
Reference information: J Clin Invest. 2021;131(13):e150790. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI150790.
See the related article at Efficient maternal to neonatal transfer of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 and BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine.