Usage Information
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 2021;131(13):e148763. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI148763.
Abstract
Seasonal influenza vaccination elicits a diminished adaptive immune response in the elderly, and the mechanisms of immunosenescence are not fully understood. Using Ig-Seq, we found a marked increase with age in the prevalence of cross-reactive (CR) serum antibodies that recognize both the H1N1 (vaccine-H1) and H3N2 (vaccine-H3) components of an egg-produced split influenza vaccine. CR antibodies accounted for 73% ± 18% of the serum vaccine responses in a cohort of elderly donors, 65% ± 15% in late middle-aged donors, and only 13% ± 5% in persons under 35 years of age. The antibody response to non-HA antigens was boosted by vaccination. Recombinant expression of 19 vaccine-H1+H3 CR serum monoclonal antibodies (s-mAbs) revealed that they predominantly bound to non-HA influenza proteins. A sizable fraction of vaccine-H1+H3 CR s-mAbs recognized with high affinity the sulfated glycans, in particular sulfated type 2 N-acetyllactosamine (Galβ1-4GalNAcβ), which is found on egg-produced proteins and thus unlikely to contribute to protection against influenza infection in humans. Antibodies against sulfated glycans in egg-produced vaccine had been identified in animals but were not previously characterized in humans. Collectively, our results provide a quantitative basis for how repeated exposure to split influenza vaccine correlates with unintended focusing of serum antibody responses to non-HA antigens that may result in suboptimal immunity against influenza.
Authors
Jiwon Jung, Sophia T. Mundle, Irina V. Ustyugova, Andrew P. Horton, Daniel R. Boutz, Svetlana Pougatcheva, Ponraj Prabakaran, Jonathan R. McDaniel, Gregory R. King, Daechan Park, Maria D. Person, Congxi Ye, Bing Tan, Yuri Tanno, Jin Eyun Kim, Nicholas C. Curtis, Joshua DiNapoli, Simon Delagrave, Ted M. Ross, Gregory C. Ippolito, Harry Kleanthous, Jiwon Lee, George Georgiou
Usage data is cumulative from June 2024 through June 2025.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 1,135 | 135 |
| 209 | 43 | |
| Figure | 461 | 1 |
| Supplemental data | 136 | 23 |
| Citation downloads | 91 | 0 |
| Totals | 2,032 | 202 |
| Total Views | 2,234 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)