Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Alerts
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Author's Takes
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Next-Generation Sequencing in Medicine (Upcoming)
    • New Therapeutic Targets in Cardiovascular Diseases (Mar 2022)
    • Immunometabolism (Jan 2022)
    • Circadian Rhythm (Oct 2021)
    • Gut-Brain Axis (Jul 2021)
    • Tumor Microenvironment (Mar 2021)
    • 100th Anniversary of Insulin's Discovery (Jan 2021)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Commentaries
    • Concise Communication
    • Editorials
    • Viewpoint
    • Top read articles
  • Clinical Medicine
  • JCI This Month
    • Current issue
    • Past issues

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Author's Takes
  • In-Press Preview
  • Commentaries
  • Concise Communication
  • Editorials
  • Viewpoint
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Alerts
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
SARS–CoV-2–specific T cell responses and correlations with COVID-19 patient predisposition
Arne Sattler, … , Martin E. Kreis, Katja Kotsch
Arne Sattler, … , Martin E. Kreis, Katja Kotsch
Published August 24, 2020
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 2020;130(12):6477-6489. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI140965.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article COVID-19

SARS–CoV-2–specific T cell responses and correlations with COVID-19 patient predisposition

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has emerged as a global pandemic caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS–CoV-2). So far, viral targets of cellular immunity and factors determining successful mounting of T cell responses are poorly defined. We therefore analyzed cellular responses to membrane, nucleocapsid, and spike proteins in individuals suffering from moderate or severe infection and in individuals who recovered from mild disease. We demonstrate that the CoV-2–specific CD4+ T helper cell response is directed against all 3 proteins with comparable magnitude, ex vivo proliferation, and portions of responding patients. However, individuals who died were more likely to have not mounted a cellular response to the proteins. Higher patient age and comorbidity index correlated with increased frequencies of CoV-2–specific CD4+ T cells, harboring higher portions of IL-2–secreting, but lower portions of IFN-γ–secreting, cells. Diminished frequencies of membrane protein–reactive IFN-γ+ T cells were particularly associated with higher acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II scores in patients admitted to intensive care. CoV-2–specific T cells exhibited elevated PD-1 expression in patients with active disease as compared with those individuals who recovered from previous mild disease. In summary, our data suggest a link between individual patient predisposition with respect to age and comorbidity and impairment of CoV-2–specific Th1-type cellular immunity, thereby supporting a concept of altered T cell function in at-risk patients.

Authors

Arne Sattler, Stefan Angermair, Helena Stockmann, Katrin Moira Heim, Dmytro Khadzhynov, Sascha Treskatsch, Fabian Halleck, Martin E. Kreis, Katja Kotsch

×

Figure 7

Exhaustion and memory phenotype of CoV-2–specific T cells.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Exhaustion and memory phenotype of CoV-2–specific T cells.
(A) Exemplary...
(A) Exemplary PD-1 expression in S-specific CD4+ T cells in a recovered individual versus a patient in ICU care with FMO control (left) and MFI of PD-1 in M-specific (ANOVA analysis), N-specific (ANOVA-analysis), and S-specific (Kruskal-Wallis analysis) T cells in patients stratified as indicated (right). (B) Memory subset distribution of CoV-2–specific T cells was determined based on CD45RO and CD62L expression. Exemplary subset identification in total (gray) and M-specific (red) CD4+ T cells (ICU patient, left) as well as frequencies of M-specific (ANOVA analysis), N-specific (ANOVA analysis), and S-specific (Kruskal-Wallis analysis) CD45RO–CD62L– T cells (right) in patients stratified as indicated in A and B (M: n = 10, N: n = 8, S: n = 10 [ICU]; M: n = 5, N: n = 3, S: n = 3 [non-ICU]; M: n = 5, N: n = 5, S: n = 5 [recovered]). Bar graphs show mean ± SEM.

Copyright © 2022 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts