Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Alerts
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Author's Takes
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Immune Environment in Glioblastoma (Feb 2023)
    • Korsmeyer Award 25th Anniversary Collection (Jan 2023)
    • Aging (Jul 2022)
    • Next-Generation Sequencing in Medicine (Jun 2022)
    • New Therapeutic Targets in Cardiovascular Diseases (Mar 2022)
    • Immunometabolism (Jan 2022)
    • Circadian Rhythm (Oct 2021)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Commentaries
    • Research letters
    • Letters to the editor
    • Editorials
    • Viewpoint
    • Top read articles
  • Clinical Medicine
  • JCI This Month
    • Current issue
    • Past issues

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Author's Takes
  • In-Press Preview
  • Commentaries
  • Research letters
  • Letters to the editor
  • Editorials
  • Viewpoint
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Alerts
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Entinostat induces antitumor immune responses through immune editing of tumor neoantigens
Andrew S. Truong, … , Benjamin G. Vincent, William Y. Kim
Andrew S. Truong, … , Benjamin G. Vincent, William Y. Kim
Published August 16, 2021
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 2021;131(16):e138560. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI138560.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Oncology

Entinostat induces antitumor immune responses through immune editing of tumor neoantigens

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Although immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been a remarkable advancement in bladder cancer treatment, the response rate to single-agent ICIs remains suboptimal. There has been substantial interest in the use of epigenetic agents to enhance ICI efficacy, although precisely how these agents potentiate ICI response has not been fully elucidated. We identified entinostat, a selective HDAC1/3 inhibitor, as a potent antitumor agent in our immune-competent bladder cancer mouse models (BBN963 and BBN966). We demonstrate that entinostat selectively promoted immune editing of tumor neoantigens, effectively remodeling the tumor immune microenvironment, resulting in a robust antitumor response that was cell autonomous, dependent upon antigen presentation, and associated with increased numbers of neoantigen-specific T cells. Finally, combination treatment with anti–PD-1 and entinostat led to complete responses and conferred long-term immunologic memory. Our work defines a tumor cell–autonomous mechanism of action for entinostat and a strong preclinical rationale for the combined use of entinostat and PD-1 blockade in bladder cancer.

Authors

Andrew S. Truong, Mi Zhou, Bhavani Krishnan, Takanobu Utsumi, Ujjawal Manocha, Kyle G. Stewart, Wolfgang Beck, Tracy L. Rose, Matthew I. Milowsky, Xiaping He, Christof C. Smith, Lisa M. Bixby, Charles M. Perou, Sara E. Wobker, Sean T. Bailey, Benjamin G. Vincent, William Y. Kim

×

Figure 2

Entinostat promotes an inflamed tumor microenvironment.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Entinostat promotes an inflamed tumor microenvironment.
(A) Schematic sh...
(A) Schematic showing how BBN963 tumors were collected for RNA-Seq. (B) Volcano plots of log2 fold change of median gene expression and –log10 P value of gene expression between the indicated treatment groups. Dashed line across plots corresponds to a significance threshold of P = 0.05. Significance was calculated using t test. (C) IPA plot of activated pathways in entinostat-treated tumors relative to vehicle-treated tumors. (D) Heatmaps of unsupervised clustering of vehicle- (n = 6) and entinostat-treated (n = 5) tumors across previously established immune gene signatures (IGS). (E) Box plots of indicated immune gene signatures. Significance was calculated using Mann-Whitney U test. Data are represented as mean ± SD. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01.

Copyright © 2023 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts