Department of Neurology, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Address correspondence to: David B. Clifford, Box 8111, 660 South Euclid Avenue, Saint Louis, Missouri 63110, USA. Phone: 314.747.8423; Email: email@example.com.
Published July 15, 2019 - More info
BACKGROUND Persistence of HIV in sanctuary sites despite antiretroviral therapy (ART) presents a barrier to HIV remission and may affect neurocognitive function. We assessed HIV persistence in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and associations with inflammation and neurocognitive performance during long-term ART.METHODS Participants enrolled in the AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) HIV Reservoirs Cohort Study (A5321) underwent concurrent lumbar puncture, phlebotomy, and neurocognitive assessment. Cell-associated HIV DNA and HIV RNA (CA-DNA, CA-RNA) were measured by quantitative PCR (qPCR). in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and in cell pellets from CSF. In CSF supernatant and blood plasma, cell-free HIV RNA was quantified by qPCR with single copy sensitivity, and inflammatory biomarkers were measured by enzyme immunoassay.RESULTS Sixty-nine participants (97% male, median age 50 years, CD4 696 cells/mm3, plasma HIV RNA <100 copies/mL) were assessed after a median 8.6 years of ART. In CSF, cell-free RNA was detected in 4%, CA-RNA in 9%, and CA-DNA in 48% of participants (median level 2.1 copies/103 cells). Detection of cell-free CSF HIV RNA was associated with higher plasma HIV RNA (P = 0.007). CSF inflammatory biomarkers did not correlate with HIV persistence measures. Detection of CSF CA-DNA HIV was associated with worse neurocognitive outcomes including global deficit score (P = 0.005), even after adjusting for age and nadir CD4 count.CONCLUSION HIV-infected cells persist in CSF in almost half of individuals on long-term ART, and their detection is associated with poorer neurocognitive performance.FUNDING This observational study, AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) HIV Reservoirs Cohort Study (A5321), was supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIAID and NIMH).
Serena Spudich, Kevin R. Robertson, Ronald J. Bosch, Rajesh T. Gandhi, Joshua C. Cyktor, Hanna Mar, Bernard J. Macatangay, Christina M. Lalama, Charles Rinaldo, Ann C. Collier, Catherine Godfrey, Joseph J. Eron, Deborah McMahon, Jana L. Jacobs, Dianna Koontz, Evelyn Hogg, Alyssa Vecchio, John W. Mellors
Neurologic involvement of HIV remains an important concern for patients, physicians, and investigators. Catastrophic decline is rarely seen in patients on combination antiretroviral therapy (cART); however, neurological decline remains a critical clinical challenge. In this issue of the JCI, Spudich and associates investigated the status of HIV in the cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) and revealed ongoing presence of HIV in the nervous system. Surprisingly, even in the face of optimal treatment, including suppressed HIV RNA, almost half of the patients investigated showed cell-associated HIV (CA-HIV) DNA in the CSF. Spudich et al. find that persistence of HIV in CSF cells is associated with lower performance on neurocognitive testing. These findings emphasize the need to consider a viral-associated mechanism as playing a significant and potentially ongoing role in HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder (HAND).
HIV-associated neurocognitive dysfunction remains one of the more devastating complications of HIV. HIV enters the nervous system early, and before combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) was available it often resulted in progressive dementia, subacute neurological decline, and death (1). While this HIV-driven catastrophe is rarely seen in patients on cART, neurocognitive dysfunction remains a common challenge (2). To date, we do not understand the cause or course of brain impairment associated with HIV. The frequent impairment in function in our patients is most often stable over time but in some patients appears to progress (3). Viral brain injury occurring before diagnosis and treatment, or frequent concurrent conditions prevalent in those also living with HIV, could explain poor neurocognitive performance in our patients. However, the possibility that HIV itself continues to trigger this dysfunction must be taken seriously, since it leaves open the possibility of progressive decline associated with the virus.
In this issue, Spudich et al. studied a group of 69 patients that represent best-case outcomes for optimal management of HIV as it has evolved during the post-cART era (4). The subjects initiated treatment during chronic infection through the AIDS Clinical Trials Group studies, and were continuously monitored for a median of 8.6 years of treatment with good evidence for excellent compliance throughout that period (4). Nearly half of the patients possessed cerebral spinal fluid–derived (CSF-derived) cells that contained HIV DNA, and importantly this persistence was associated with inferior neurocognitive performance. The presence of CA-HIV DNA in the CSF is surprising, given the overall cART compliance in this group, and it may provide a mechanism for how persistent proviruses contribute to CNS dysfunction. Ultimately, optimized brain function is the most prized achievement of HIV therapy, making the negative neurocognitive association with CSF CA-HIV DNA a reason for ongoing concern. If excellent HIV therapy extends life but fails to protect brain function, the achievement of successful HIV therapy is a Pyrrhic, or hollow, victory.
The most striking finding in Spudich et al. — that such a large proportion of patients have cells harboring HIV DNA — raises several critical questions that are important but technically difficult to answer (4). What cell type contains this residual virus remains a key question. Spudich and associates used an age-matched neurologically normal HIV-negative volunteer population to compare CSF cell counts in the setting of well-treated HIV. It is remarkable that CSF cell counts are essentially normal in those with well-treated HIV. While the profile may reflect normal nucleated cell populations in CSF with lymphocytes, monocytes, B cells, and NK cells, the affected cells could even represent a unique brain-associated population that may migrate to the CSF compartment (5). Future studies might explore a variety of questions. Are the cells containing HIV DNA simply part of the ongoing trafficking of cells entering and leaving the brain that are involved in routine immunological monitoring of this critical organ? Could these cells possess a cytokine expression profile that promotes their transfer into the CSF? Are the viral copies found in the CSF cells replication competent? What is the relation between the sequences of HIV in these cells and those in peripheral and CNS locations? Emerging technologies such as single-cell RNA sequencing could explore the expression patterns represented in CSF cells of patients with and without CA-HIV DNA or HAND to expand the understanding of this critical cohort of cells (5).
Spudich et al. report concurrent inflammatory markers in CSF to consider mechanisms of potential ongoing injury (4). The findings challenge the hypothesis that HIV-associated brain dysfunction is driven by immune activation. Lacking simpler explanations, an inflammatory mechanism probably stimulated by residual HIV has too often been presented as the most likely cause of ongoing neurological involvement in HIV patients (6). Lack of correlation of inflammatory markers with viral presence in the CSF in this study, as well as with neurocognitive performance, brings this hypothesis into question in a way that should be healthy for the field. If residual virus triggering ongoing inflammation is the mechanism for neurocognitive impairment, therapeutic efforts such as changing therapy to intensify or increase brain-drug penetrance are rational approaches to manage HAND (7, 8). Based on this study, it is not surprising that these strategies may fail to meaningfully change the inflammatory profile and perhaps the neurocognitive deficits.
Chronic immune activation in HIV patients remains a valid observation but whether it is truly sufficient to drive ongoing brain dysfunction or damage is completely unproven. The data presented by Spudich et al. do not support the hypothesis that residual HIV within the brain compartment drives this immune activation. More longitudinal analysis of CSF inflammatory responses and residual HIV in the CNS are needed to critically evaluate the chronic smoldering inflammatory response on neurocognitive performance. Further studies could compare HIV-treated patients to patients with other diseases, such as inflammatory bowel disease, that result in chronic immune activation.
Some contend that HIV results in accelerated aging related to degeneration of brain physiology and structures. However, neurocognitive performance gaps may accrue early in infection, then evolve in parallel with normal age-related changes. Successfully treated HIV patients (in whom it seems CA virus is prevalent) have a similar aging pace as the general population in some but not all studies (9–12). In part because the HIV population has complex comorbidities that contribute and likely dominate the impact of HIV itself, assembling high-quality longitudinal, well-controlled patient studies has been difficult. Notably, many of the same factors driving declining function in the general population deserve immediate attention in our HIV patients; most salient are those that impact vascular disease (including diabetes, smoking, blood pressure control, and cholesterol) (13–15). Given the decrement in function that often occurs in HIV patients, addressing vascular factors and helping our patients adopt a healthy, active lifestyle may yield more fruitful neuroprotection than changes in traditional viral-directed interventions (16).
It is important not to catastrophize the results of this study. Spudich et al. report that patients both with and without CSF CA-HIV DNA had median neurocognitive performances in the normal range (4). While the percentage of participants whose performance fell in the impaired range was higher for those with virus in the CSF, the difference in performance was notably modest. The small cross-sectional difference between the two groups leaves room for questioning whether the virus underlies this change. Longitudinal measures will be critical to assess the relationship between cognitive function and CA-HIV DNA in the nervous system. The surprising prevalence of viral DNA in cells in the CSF revealed by Spudich et al. justifies continued investigation into how HIV might directly impact brain function in treated HIV patients, and begs discovery of practical ways to eliminate the virus from this reservoir.
The author gratefully acknowledges the many generous patients participating in his trials and clinic, his colleagues, and the support of NIH grants AI069439, NS10719801, MH10734504, AG0617904, AG05326702, and UL1TR00234502.
Conflict of interest: The author has declared that no conflict of interest exists.
Copyright: © 2019, American Society for Clinical Investigation.
Reference information: J Clin Invest. 2019;129(8):3052–3053. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI127831.
See the related article at Persistent HIV-infected cells in cerebrospinal fluid are associated with poorer neurocognitive performance.