Inherited bone marrow failure syndromes (IBMFSs) are a heterogeneous group of disorders characterized by defective hematopoiesis, impaired stem cell function, and cancer susceptibility. Diagnosis of IBMFS presents a major challenge due to the large variety of associated phenotypes, and novel, clinically relevant biomarkers are urgently needed. Our study identified nuclear interaction partner of ALK (NIPA) as an IBMFS gene, as it is significantly downregulated in a distinct subset of myelodysplastic syndrome–type (MDS-type) refractory cytopenia in children. Mechanistically, we showed that NIPA is major player in the Fanconi anemia (FA) pathway, which binds FANCD2 and regulates its nuclear abundance, making it essential for a functional DNA repair/FA/BRCA pathway. In a knockout mouse model, Nipa deficiency led to major cell-intrinsic defects, including a premature aging phenotype, with accumulation of DNA damage in hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs). Induction of replication stress triggered a reduction in and functional decline of murine HSCs, resulting in complete bone marrow failure and death of the knockout mice with 100% penetrance. Taken together, the results of our study add NIPA to the short list of FA-associated proteins, thereby highlighting its potential as a diagnostic marker and/or possible target in diseases characterized by hematopoietic failure.
Stefanie Kreutmair, Miriam Erlacher, Geoffroy Andrieux, Rouzanna Istvanffy, Alina Mueller-Rudorf, Melissa Zwick, Tamina Rückert, Milena Pantic, Teresa Poggio, Khalid Shoumariyeh, Tony A. Mueller, Hiroyuki Kawaguchi, Marie Follo, Cathrin Klingeberg, Marcin Wlodarski, Irith Baumann, Dietmar Pfeifer, Michal Kulinski, Martina Rudelius, Simone Lemeer, Bernhard Kuster, Christine Dierks, Christian Peschel, Nina Cabezas-Wallscheid, Jesus Duque-Afonso, Robert Zeiser, Michael L. Cleary, Detlev Schindler, Annette Schmitt-Graeff, Melanie Boerries, Charlotte M. Niemeyer, Robert A.J. Oostendorp, Justus Duyster, Anna Lena Illert
Usage data is cumulative from May 2020 through May 2021.
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.