Molecular analysis of dystrophin Kobe showed that exon 19 of the dystrophin gene bearing 52-bp deletion was skipped during splicing, although the known consensus sequences at the 5' and 3' splice sites of exon 19 were maintained (Matsuo, M., T. Masumura, H. Nishio, T. Nakajima, Y. Kitoh, T. Takumi, J. Koga, and H. Nakamura. 1991. J. Clin. Invest. 87:2127-2131). These data suggest that the deleted sequence of exon 19 may function as a cis-acting element for exact splicing for the upstream and downstream introns. To investigate this potential role of exon 19, an in vitro splicing system using artificial dystrophin mRNA precursors (pre-mRNAs) was established. Pre-mRNA containing exon 18, truncated intron 18, and exon 19 was spliced precisely in vitro, whereas splicing of intron 18 was almost completely abolished when the wild-type exon 19 was replaced by the dystrophin Kobe exon 19. Splicing of intron 18 was not fully reactivated when dystrophin Kobe exon 19 was restored to nearly normal length by inserting other sequences into the deleted site. These results suggest that the presence of the exon 19 sequence which is lost in dystrophin Kobe is more critical for splicing of intron 18 than the length of the exon 19 sequence. Characteristically, the efficiency of splicing of this intron seemed to correlate with the presence of polypurine tracks within the downstream exon 19. Moreover, an antisense 31-mer 2'-O-methyl ribonucleotide complementary to the 5' half of the deleted sequence in dystrophin Kobe exon 19 inhibited splicing of wild-type pre-mRNA in a dose- and time-dependent manner. This first in vitro evidence that dystrophin pre-mRNA splicing can be modulated by an antisense oligonucleotide raises the possibility of a new therapeutic approach for Duchenne muscular dystrophy.
Y Takeshima, H Nishio, H Sakamoto, H Nakamura, M Matsuo
Usage data is cumulative from May 2023 through May 2024.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 433 | 0 |
118 | 59 | |
Scanned page | 101 | 20 |
Citation downloads | 5 | 0 |
Totals | 657 | 79 |
Total Views | 736 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.