Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Pancreatic Cancer (Jul 2025)
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • Sex Differences in Medicine (Sep 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact

Usage Information

A restriction fragment of the C2 gene is a unique marker for C2 deficiency and the uncommon C2 allele C2*B (a marker for type 1 diabetes).
S Simon, … , E J Yunis, C A Alper
S Simon, … , E J Yunis, C A Alper
Published December 1, 1991
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 1991;88(6):2142-2145. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI115545.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article

A restriction fragment of the C2 gene is a unique marker for C2 deficiency and the uncommon C2 allele C2*B (a marker for type 1 diabetes).

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

There are three common C2 protein alleles in caucasians, C2*C, C2*B, and C2*Q0, with allele frequencies of 0.96, 0.03, and 0.01, as well as Sst I RFLP variants of 2.75, 2.7, 2.65, 2.55, and 2.4 kb, with frequencies of 0.017, 0.533, 0.358, 0.017, and 0.075. Thus, C2*C is informatively split by the RFLP. Of 94 nonrandomly ascertained caucasian complotypes, 77 contained C2*C, four contained C2*Q0, and 13 had C2*B. None of the C2*C-containing complotypes carried the 2.75 kb Sst I fragment and all of the complotypes with C2*B or C2*Q0 carried it. All of the C2*Q0 alleles were associated with C4A*4, C4B*2 in the complotype S042 as previously reported. C2*B was usually (9/13) in the complotype SB42, occasionally (1/13 each) in SB45, SB41, SB(4,3)0, and SB31. Thus, the association of the C2 2.75-kb fragment was with C2*B and C2*Q0, not with C4A*4, C4B*2, or even C4A*4 alone. The complotype SC42 was associated with the 2.65-kb Sst I fragment in four of five instances and in a single example with the 2.7-kb fragment. C2*B and C2*Q0 possibly had a common evolutionary ancestor complotype which carried the 2.75-kb Sst I fragment, and BF*S, C4A*4, and C4B*2. C2*B (particularly as the haplotype HLA-Bw62, SB42, DR4) is associated with type 1 diabetes but C2*Q0 is protective.

Authors

S Simon, Z Awdeh, R D Campbell, P Ronco 2nd, S J Brink, G S Eisenbarth, E J Yunis, C A Alper

×

Usage data is cumulative from September 2024 through September 2025.

Usage JCI PMC
Text version 86 11
PDF 35 6
Scanned page 98 0
Citation downloads 45 0
Totals 264 17
Total Views 281
(Click and drag on plot area to zoom in. Click legend items above to toggle)

Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.

Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.

Advertisement

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts