There are three common C2 protein alleles in caucasians, C2*C, C2*B, and C2*Q0, with allele frequencies of 0.96, 0.03, and 0.01, as well as Sst I RFLP variants of 2.75, 2.7, 2.65, 2.55, and 2.4 kb, with frequencies of 0.017, 0.533, 0.358, 0.017, and 0.075. Thus, C2*C is informatively split by the RFLP. Of 94 nonrandomly ascertained caucasian complotypes, 77 contained C2*C, four contained C2*Q0, and 13 had C2*B. None of the C2*C-containing complotypes carried the 2.75 kb Sst I fragment and all of the complotypes with C2*B or C2*Q0 carried it. All of the C2*Q0 alleles were associated with C4A*4, C4B*2 in the complotype S042 as previously reported. C2*B was usually (9/13) in the complotype SB42, occasionally (1/13 each) in SB45, SB41, SB(4,3)0, and SB31. Thus, the association of the C2 2.75-kb fragment was with C2*B and C2*Q0, not with C4A*4, C4B*2, or even C4A*4 alone. The complotype SC42 was associated with the 2.65-kb Sst I fragment in four of five instances and in a single example with the 2.7-kb fragment. C2*B and C2*Q0 possibly had a common evolutionary ancestor complotype which carried the 2.75-kb Sst I fragment, and BF*S, C4A*4, and C4B*2. C2*B (particularly as the haplotype HLA-Bw62, SB42, DR4) is associated with type 1 diabetes but C2*Q0 is protective.
S Simon, Z Awdeh, R D Campbell, P Ronco 2nd, S J Brink, G S Eisenbarth, E J Yunis, C A Alper
Usage data is cumulative from March 2023 through March 2024.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 122 | 0 |
88 | 13 | |
Scanned page | 75 | 2 |
Citation downloads | 14 | 0 |
Totals | 299 | 15 |
Total Views | 314 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.