Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Alerts
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Author's Takes
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Immune Environment in Glioblastoma (Feb 2023)
    • Korsmeyer Award 25th Anniversary Collection (Jan 2023)
    • Aging (Jul 2022)
    • Next-Generation Sequencing in Medicine (Jun 2022)
    • New Therapeutic Targets in Cardiovascular Diseases (Mar 2022)
    • Immunometabolism (Jan 2022)
    • Circadian Rhythm (Oct 2021)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Commentaries
    • Research letters
    • Letters to the editor
    • Editorials
    • Viewpoint
    • Top read articles
  • Clinical Medicine
  • JCI This Month
    • Current issue
    • Past issues

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Author's Takes
  • In-Press Preview
  • Commentaries
  • Research letters
  • Letters to the editor
  • Editorials
  • Viewpoint
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Alerts
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Top
  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Share this article
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal
  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Version history
  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article

Advertisement

Research Article Free access | 10.1172/JCI114407

Biochemical basis of prolidase deficiency. Polypeptide and RNA phenotypes and the relation to clinical phenotypes.

F Endo, A Tanoue, A Kitano, J Arata, D M Danks, C M Lapière, Y Sei, S K Wadman, and I Matsuda

Department of Pediatrics, Kumamoto University Medical School, Japan.

Find articles by Endo, F. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar

Department of Pediatrics, Kumamoto University Medical School, Japan.

Find articles by Tanoue, A. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar

Department of Pediatrics, Kumamoto University Medical School, Japan.

Find articles by Kitano, A. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar

Department of Pediatrics, Kumamoto University Medical School, Japan.

Find articles by Arata, J. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar

Department of Pediatrics, Kumamoto University Medical School, Japan.

Find articles by Danks, D. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar

Department of Pediatrics, Kumamoto University Medical School, Japan.

Find articles by Lapière, C. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar

Department of Pediatrics, Kumamoto University Medical School, Japan.

Find articles by Sei, Y. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar

Department of Pediatrics, Kumamoto University Medical School, Japan.

Find articles by Wadman, S. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar

Department of Pediatrics, Kumamoto University Medical School, Japan.

Find articles by Matsuda, I. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar

Published January 1, 1990 - More info

Published in Volume 85, Issue 1 on January 1, 1990
J Clin Invest. 1990;85(1):162–169. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI114407.
© 1990 The American Society for Clinical Investigation
Published January 1, 1990 - Version history
View PDF
Abstract

Cultured skin fibroblasts or lymphoblastoid cells from eight patients with clinical symptoms of prolidase deficiency were analyzed in terms of enzyme activity, presence of material crossreacting with specific antibodies, biosynthesis of the polypeptide, and mRNA corresponding to the enzyme. There are at least two enzymes that hydrolyze imidodipeptides in these cells and these two enzymes could be separated by an immunochemical procedure. The specific assay for prolidase showed that the enzyme activity was virtually absent in six cell strains and was markedly reduced in two (less than 3% of controls). The activities of the labile enzyme that did not immunoprecipitate with the anti-prolidase antibody were decreased in the cells (30-60% of controls). Cell strains with residual activities of prolidase had immunological polypeptides crossreacting with a Mr 56,000, similar to findings in the normal enzyme. The polypeptide biosynthesis in these cells and the controls was similar. Northern blot analyses revealed the presence of mRNA in the polypeptide-positive cells, yet it was absent in the polypeptide-negative cells. The substrate specificities analyzed in the partially purified enzymes from the polypeptide-positive cell strains differed, presumably due to different mutations. Thus, there seems to be a molecular heterogeneity in prolidase deficiency. There was no apparent relation between the clinical symptoms and the biochemical phenotypes, except that mental retardation was present in the polypeptide-negative patients. The activities of the labile enzyme may not be a major factor in modifying the clinical symptoms.

Images.

Browse pages

Click on an image below to see the page. View PDF of the complete article

icon of scanned page 162
page 162
icon of scanned page 163
page 163
icon of scanned page 164
page 164
icon of scanned page 165
page 165
icon of scanned page 166
page 166
icon of scanned page 167
page 167
icon of scanned page 168
page 168
icon of scanned page 169
page 169
Version history
  • Version 1 (January 1, 1990): No description

Article tools

  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Share this article
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal

Metrics

  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article

Go to

  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Version history
Advertisement
Advertisement

Copyright © 2023 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts