Quantitative electron microscopic autoradiography was used for comparing the binding of labeled somatostatin-14 (S-14) and somatostatin-28 (S-28 section) to islet cells. Monolayer cultures of rat islet cells were incubated with [125I-Tyr11]S-14 (S-14 section) or [125I-Leu8, D-Trp22, Tyr25]S-28 (S-28 section) in the presence or absence of excess unlabeled peptides. Autoradiographic grains (ARG) associated with individual islet cells were identified and expressed as the mean number per B, A, and D cells. Specific ARG associated with S-14 were found over B and A cells. S-28 section-related specific ARG were concentrated over B, A, as well as D cells. The highest density of S-14 section labeling occurred over A cells, which under conditions of maximum labeling (37 degrees C for 60 min) contained five times as many ARG as did B cells. By contrast, under the same incubation conditions, the labeling density with S-28 section was maximal over B cells, which contained four and five times as many grains as A and D cells, respectively. These observations show preferential association of S-14 section with the A cell and S-28 section with the B cel provide strong evidence for the existence of separate binding sites for S-14 section and S-28 section on A and B cells, respectively, which presumably mediate the previously reported glucagon selective inhibitory effect of S-14 and the insulin-selective action of S-28.
M Amherdt, Y C Patel, L Orci
Usage data is cumulative from July 2025 through July 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 235 | 5 |
| 130 | 8 | |
| Figure | 0 | 2 |
| Scanned page | 248 | 3 |
| Citation downloads | 136 | 0 |
| Totals | 749 | 18 |
| Total Views | 767 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.