Maintenance of chronic metabolic alkalosis might occur by a reduction in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) without increased bicarbonate reabsorption or, alternatively, by augmentation of bicarbonate reabsorption with a normal GFR. To differentiate these possibilities, free-flow micropuncture was performed in alkalotic Munich-Wistar rats with a glomerular ultrafiltrate total CO2 concentration of 46.5 +/- 0.9 mM (vs. 27.7 +/- 0.9 mM in controls). Alkalotic animals had a markedly reduced single nephron GFR compared with controls (27.4 +/- 1.5 vs. 51.6 +/- 1.6 nl/min) and consequently unchanged filtered load of bicarbonate. Absolute proximal bicarbonate reabsorption in alkalotic animals was similar to controls (981 +/- 49 vs. 1,081 +/- 57 pmol/min), despite a higher luminal bicarbonate concentration, contracted extracellular volume, and potassium depletion. When single nephron GFR during alkalosis was increased toward normal by isohydric volume expansion or in another group by isotonic bicarbonate loading, absolute proximal bicarbonate reabsorption was not substantially augmented and bicarbonaturia developed. To confirm that a fall in GFR occurs during metabolic alkalosis, additional clearance studies were performed. Awake rats were studied before and after induction of metabolic alkalosis associated with varying amounts of potassium and chloride depletion. In all cases, the rise in blood bicarbonate concentration was inversely proportional to a reduction in GFR; filtered bicarbonate load remained normal. In conclusion, a reduction in GFR is proposed as being critical for maintaining chronic metabolic alkalosis in the rat. Constancy of the filtered bicarbonate load allows normal rates of renal bicarbonate reabsorption to maintain the alkalotic state.
M G Cogan, F Y Liu
Usage data is cumulative from August 2024 through August 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 124 | 16 |
50 | 20 | |
Scanned page | 757 | 4 |
Citation downloads | 64 | 0 |
Totals | 995 | 40 |
Total Views | 1,035 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.