Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Pancreatic Cancer (Jul 2025)
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • Sex Differences in Medicine (Sep 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Top
  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal
  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Version history
  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article

Advertisement

Research Article Free access | 10.1172/JCI108518

Age and activity effects on rate of bone mineral loss.

D M Smith, M R Khairi, J Norton, and C C Johnston Jr

Find articles by Smith, D. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

Find articles by Khairi, M. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

Find articles by Norton, J. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

Find articles by Johnston, C. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

Published September 1, 1976 - More info

Published in Volume 58, Issue 3 on September 1, 1976
J Clin Invest. 1976;58(3):716–721. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI108518.
© 1976 The American Society for Clinical Investigation
Published September 1, 1976 - Version history
View PDF
Abstract

It has been postulated that the rate of mineral loss in postmenopausal women remains constant with aging and that the decreased activities of daily living associated with aging contribute to mineral loss. These hypothese were examined by measuring the bone mineral content at the midshaft of the radius with the photon absorption technique. The estimated rate of loss was calculated in a cross-sectional study as the regression coefficient of bone mineral content vs. age and in a longitudinal study as the regression coefficient of bone mineral content vs. time. In the cross-sectional study, Group A, which consisted of 264 women aged 50-72 yr, had an estimated rate of loss of -0.0114 +/- 0.0014 (SE) g/cm per yr. Group B, which consisted of 266 women aged 73-96 yr, had an estimated rate of loss of -0.0055 +/- 0.0017 g/cm per yr. In the longitudinal study, Group C consisted of 33 women aged 51-65 yr who were followed for an average of 4.5 yr with a mean number of 16 visits per subject; they were found to have a mean rate of loss of -0.00990 +/- 0.00107 g/cm per yr. Group D consisted of 38 women aged 70-91 yr who were followed for an average of 3.8 yr with a mean number of 31 visits per subjects; they were found to have a mean rate of loss of -0.00020 +/- 0.00236 g/cm per yr. The estimated and directly measured rates of loss were more rapid in the younger groups than in the older groups (A vs. B, P less than 0.001; C vs. D, P less than 0.001). These data demonstrate that the mean rate of mineral loss is not constant with aging and that in elderly subjects it is significantly slower than that of the earlier postmenopausal years. Since the elderly women were the less active, these findings suggest that factors other than decreased physical activity are more important in determining the rates of mineral loss.

Browse pages

Click on an image below to see the page. View PDF of the complete article

icon of scanned page 716
page 716
icon of scanned page 717
page 717
icon of scanned page 718
page 718
icon of scanned page 719
page 719
icon of scanned page 720
page 720
icon of scanned page 721
page 721
Version history
  • Version 1 (September 1, 1976): No description

Article tools

  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal

Metrics

  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article

Go to

  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Version history
Advertisement
Advertisement

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts