While radiation is an effective oncologic therapy, killing cancer by inducing DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), it lacks specificity for neoplastic cells. We have previously adapted the CRISPR/Cas9 gene-editing technology as a cancer-specific treatment modality targeting somatic mutations in pancreatic cancer (PC). However, its tumoricidal potential remains unclear, especially in comparison with therapeutic doses of radiation. Here, we demonstrate that CRISPR/Cas9-induced DSBs are more cytotoxic in PCs than a comparable number of radiation-induced DSBs. We observed more than 90% tumor growth inhibition by targeting 9 sites with cancer-specific sgRNAs. Through both bioinformatics and cytogenetics analyses, we found that CRISPR/Cas9-induced DSBs triggered ongoing chromosomal rearrangements, with 87% of structural variants not directly produced from the initial CRISPR/Cas9-induced DSBs, and chromosomal instability peaking before cell death. By comparing the cytotoxicity of CRISPR/Cas9- and radiation-induced DSBs, we demonstrated that the number of DSBs required to achieve equitoxic effects was approximately 3 times higher for radiation than CRISPR/Cas9. Finally, we showed that PC cells that had survived CRISPR/Cas9 targeting retained susceptibility to subsequent CRISPR/Cas9-induced DSBs at different genomic sites with more than 87% growth inhibition. Together, our data support the therapeutic potential of CRISPR/Cas9 as an anticancer strategy.
Selina Shiqing K. Teh, Akhil Kotwal, Alexis Bennett, Eitan Halper-Stromberg, Laura Morsberger, Saum Zamani, Yanan Shi, Alyza Skaist, Qingfeng Zhu, Kirsten Bowland, Hong Liang, Ralph H. Hruban, Chien-Fu Hung, Robert A. Anders, Nicholas J. Roberts, Robert B. Scharpf, Michael Goldstein, Ying S. Zou, James R. Eshleman
The Editorial Board will only consider comments that are deemed relevant and of interest to readers. The Journal will not post data that have not been subjected to peer review; or a comment that is essentially a reiteration of another comment.