Submit a comment

Cancer-associated SPOP mutations enlarge nuclear size and facilitate nuclear envelope rupture upon farnesyltransferase inhibitor treatment
Zixi Wang, Lei Li, Qi Ye, Yuzeshi Lei, Mingming Lu, Leihong Ye, Jialu Kang, Wenyue Huang, Shan Xu, Ke Wang, Jing Liu, Yang Gao, Chenji Wang, Jian Ma, Lei Li
Zixi Wang, Lei Li, Qi Ye, Yuzeshi Lei, Mingming Lu, Leihong Ye, Jialu Kang, Wenyue Huang, Shan Xu, Ke Wang, Jing Liu, Yang Gao, Chenji Wang, Jian Ma, Lei Li
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Cell biology

Cancer-associated SPOP mutations enlarge nuclear size and facilitate nuclear envelope rupture upon farnesyltransferase inhibitor treatment

Abstract

Nuclear size is crucial for cellular functions and often increases with malignancy. Irregular nuclei are linked to aggressive tumors, driven by genetic and epigenetic changes. However, the precise mechanisms controlling nuclear size are still not fully understood. In this study, we demonstrated that cancer-associated speckle-type POZ protein (SPOP) mutations enlarged nuclear size by reducing the protein level of lamin B2 (LMNB2), a key nuclear integrity protein. Mechanistically, SPOP bound to LMNB2 and promoted its mono-ubiquitination at lysine-484, which protected it from degradation by the E3 ubiquitin ligase WD repeat domain 26. SPOP mutations disrupted this process, leading to reduced LMNB2 levels and impaired nuclear envelope (NE) integrity. This compromised NE was more vulnerable to damage from farnesyltransferase inhibitors (FTIs), causing nuclear rupture in SPOP-mutant tumor cells. This study identified SPOP as a positive regulator of nuclear size; the findings suggest tumors with SPOP mutations may be vulnerable to FTI-based therapies.

Authors

Zixi Wang, Lei Li, Qi Ye, Yuzeshi Lei, Mingming Lu, Leihong Ye, Jialu Kang, Wenyue Huang, Shan Xu, Ke Wang, Jing Liu, Yang Gao, Chenji Wang, Jian Ma, Lei Li

×

Guidelines

The Editorial Board will only consider comments that are deemed relevant and of interest to readers. The Journal will not post data that have not been subjected to peer review; or a comment that is essentially a reiteration of another comment.

  • Comments appear on the Journal’s website and are linked from the original article’s web page.
  • Authors are notified by email if their comments are posted.
  • The Journal reserves the right to edit comments for length and clarity.
  • No appeals will be considered.
  • Comments are not indexed in PubMed.

Specific requirements

  • Maximum length, 400 words
  • Entered as plain text or HTML
  • Author’s name and email address, to be posted with the comment
  • Declaration of all potential conflicts of interest (even if these are not ultimately posted); see the Journal’s conflict-of-interest policy
  • Comments may not include figures
This field is required
This field is required
This field is required
This field is required
This field is required
This field is required