Submit a comment
Abstract
Lineage plasticity is recognized as a critical determinant of lethality and resistance to AR pathway inhibitors in prostate cancer. Lineage plasticity is a continuum, ranging from AR activity-low tumors, AR-null tumors that do not express a neuroendocrine prostate cancer (NEPC) program (i.e., double-negative prostate cancer [DNPC]), and AR-null NEPC tumors. Factors upregulated early in lineage plasticity are not well-characterized. The clarification of such factors is essential to identify tumors undergoing lineage plasticity or at risk of this occurring. Our integrative analysis of metastatic prostate cancer patient tumors, patient-derived xenografts, and cell models determined that PROX1 is upregulated early in the lineage plasticity continuum and progressively increases as tumors lose AR activity. We determined DNA methylation is a key regulator of PROX1 expression. PROX1 suppression in DNPC and NEPC reduces cell survival and impacts apoptosis and differentiation, demonstrating PROX1’s functional importance. PROX1 is not directly targetable with standard drug development approaches. However, affinity immunopurification demonstrated histone deacetylases (HDACs) are among the top PROX1-interacting proteins; HDAC inhibition depletes PROX1 and recapitulates PROX1 suppression in DNPC and NEPC. Altogether, our results suggest PROX1 promotes the emergence of lineage plasticity, and HDAC inhibition is a promising approach to treat tumors across the lineage plasticity continuum.
Authors
Zhi Duan, Mingchen Shi, Anbarasu Kumaraswamy, Dong Lin, Dhruv Khokhani, Yong Wang, Chao Zhang, Diana Flores, Eva Rodansky, Olivia A. Swaim, William K. Storck, Hannah N. Beck, Radhika A. Patel, Erolcan Sayar, Brian P. Hanratty, Hui Xue, Xin Dong, Zoe R. Maylin, Rensheng Wan, David A. Quigley, Martin Sjöström, Ya-Mei Hu, Faming Zhao, Zheng Xia, Siyuan Cheng, Xiuping Yu, Felix Y. Feng, Li Zhang, Rahul Aggarwal, Eric J. Small, Visweswaran Ravikumar, Arvind Rao, Karan Bedi, John K. Lee, Colm Morrissey, Ilsa Coleman, Peter S. Nelson, Eva Corey, Aaron M. Udager, Ryan J. Rebernick, Marcin P. Cieslik, Arul M. Chinnaiyan, Joel A. Yates, Michael C. Haffner, Yuzhuo Wang, Joshi J. Alumkal
Guidelines
The Editorial Board will only consider comments that are deemed relevant and of interest to readers. The Journal will not post data that have not been subjected to peer review; or a comment that is essentially a reiteration of another comment.
- Comments appear on the Journal’s website and are linked from the original article’s web page.
- Authors are notified by email if their comments are posted.
- The Journal reserves the right to edit comments for length and clarity.
- No appeals will be considered.
- Comments are not indexed in PubMed.
Specific requirements
- Maximum length, 400 words
- Entered as plain text or HTML
- Author’s name and email address, to be posted with the comment
- Declaration of all potential conflicts of interest (even if these are not ultimately posted); see the Journal’s conflict-of-interest policy
- Comments may not include figures
Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)