Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • ASCI Milestone Awards
    • Video Abstracts
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Neurodegeneration (Mar 2026)
    • Clinical innovation and scientific progress in GLP-1 medicine (Nov 2025)
    • Pancreatic Cancer (Jul 2025)
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • ASCI Milestone Awards
  • Video Abstracts
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
CD155 loss enhances tumor suppression via combined host and tumor-intrinsic mechanisms
Xian-Yang Li, Indrajit Das, Ailin Lepletier, Venkateswar Addala, Tobias Bald, Kimberley Stannard, Deborah Barkauskas, Jing Liu, Amelia Roman Aguilera, Kazuyoshi Takeda, Matthias Braun, Kyohei Nakamura, Sebastien Jacquelin, Steven W. Lane, Michele W.L. Teng, William C. Dougall, Mark J. Smyth
Xian-Yang Li, Indrajit Das, Ailin Lepletier, Venkateswar Addala, Tobias Bald, Kimberley Stannard, Deborah Barkauskas, Jing Liu, Amelia Roman Aguilera, Kazuyoshi Takeda, Matthias Braun, Kyohei Nakamura, Sebastien Jacquelin, Steven W. Lane, Michele W.L. Teng, William C. Dougall, Mark J. Smyth
View: Text | PDF | Retraction
Research Article Immunology

CD155 loss enhances tumor suppression via combined host and tumor-intrinsic mechanisms

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Critical immune-suppressive pathways beyond programmed death 1 (PD-1) and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) require greater attention. Nectins and nectin-like molecules might be promising targets for immunotherapy, since they play critical roles in cell proliferation and migration and exert immunomodulatory functions in pathophysiological conditions. Here, we show CD155 expression in both malignant cells and tumor-infiltrating myeloid cells in humans and mice. Cd155–/– mice displayed reduced tumor growth and metastasis via DNAM-1 upregulation and enhanced effector function of CD8+ T and NK cells, respectively. CD155-deleted tumor cells also displayed slower tumor growth and reduced metastases, demonstrating the importance of a tumor-intrinsic role of CD155. CD155 absence on host and tumor cells exerted an even greater inhibition of tumor growth and metastasis. Blockade of PD-1 or both PD-1 and CTLA4 was more effective in settings in which CD155 was limiting, suggesting the clinical potential of cotargeting PD-L1 and CD155 function.

Authors

Xian-Yang Li, Indrajit Das, Ailin Lepletier, Venkateswar Addala, Tobias Bald, Kimberley Stannard, Deborah Barkauskas, Jing Liu, Amelia Roman Aguilera, Kazuyoshi Takeda, Matthias Braun, Kyohei Nakamura, Sebastien Jacquelin, Steven W. Lane, Michele W.L. Teng, William C. Dougall, Mark J. Smyth

×

Figure 2

Tumor growth and metastasis are inhibited in Cd155–/– mice in a BM cell–dependent manner.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Tumor growth and metastasis are inhibited in Cd155–/– mice in a BM cell–...
(A–C) WT and Cd155–/– mice were injected s.c. with 1 × 105 B16F10 cells (n = 6–7/group) (A) or 5 × 105 SM1WT1 cells (n = 7/group) (B), or 5 × 105 MC38 cells (n = 5–6/group) (C), and tumor sizes were measured at the indicated time points. (D and E) WT and Cd155–/– mice were challenged i.v. with 2 × 105 B16F10 cells (n = 8–11/group) (D) or 7.5 × 105 LWT1 cells (n = 6–7/group) (E), 2 weeks after tumor inoculation, and metastatic burden was quantified in the lungs by counting colonies on the lung surface. (F and G) WT and Cd155–/– mice were treated with 100 μg cIg, or 100 μg anti-CD8β (53.5.8, CD8+ T cell depletion), or 100 μg anti-CD4 (GK1.5, CD4+ T cell depletion) plus 100 μg anti-CD8β (53.5.8), or 50 μg anti-asGM1 (NK cell depletion) on days –1, 0, 7, and 14 for tumor growth, or on days –1, 0, and 7 for tumor metastasis relative to tumor inoculation. Mice were challenged s.c. with 1 × 105 B16F10 cells (n = 5–6/group; the experiment was performed once) (F), and tumor sizes were measured at the indicated time points, or mice were challenged i.v. with 7.5 × 105 LWT1 cells (n = 6/group) (G), and lung metastases were quantified 2 weeks after tumor inoculation. (H and J) Ptprca (CD45.1+) and Cd155–/– (CD45.2+) mice were irradiated twice (total radiation dose: 1,050 cGy/rad), and 5 × 106 BM cells from Ptprca or Cd155–/– mice were then i.v. injected into each irradiated mouse to construct BM chimeric mice (H). Mice were then challenged s.c. with 1 × 105 B16F10 (I) or i.v. with 2 × 105 B16F10 (J) cells, respectively (n = 10/group; the experiment was performed once for both I and J). Tumor sizes were measured at the indicated time points (I), and lung metastases were quantified 2 weeks after tumor inoculation (J). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, and ****P < 0.0001, by 1-tailed Mann-Whitney U test or 2-way ANOVA. Data indicate the mean ± SEM and are representative of 3 experiments unless otherwise indicated. See also Supplemental Figures 2 and 3.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts