Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • Sex Differences in Medicine (Sep 2024)
    • Vascular Malformations (Apr 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Insulin receptor signaling regulates renal collecting duct and intercalated cell antibacterial defenses
Matthew J. Murtha, … , Brian Becknell, John David Spencer
Matthew J. Murtha, … , Brian Becknell, John David Spencer
Published November 12, 2018
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 2018;128(12):5634-5646. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI98595.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Immunology Nephrology

Insulin receptor signaling regulates renal collecting duct and intercalated cell antibacterial defenses

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

People with diabetes mellitus have increased infection risk. With diabetes, urinary tract infection (UTI) is more common and has worse outcomes. Here, we investigate how diabetes and insulin resistance impact the kidney’s innate defenses and urine sterility. We report that type 2 diabetic mice have increased UTI risk. Moreover, insulin-resistant prediabetic mice have increased UTI susceptibility, independent of hyperglycemia or glucosuria. To identify how insulin resistance affects renal antimicrobial defenses, we genetically deleted the insulin receptor in the kidney’s collecting tubules and intercalated cells. Intercalated cells, located within collecting tubules, contribute to epithelial defenses by acidifying the urine and secreting antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) into the urinary stream. Collecting duct and intercalated cell–specific insulin receptor deletion did not impact urine acidification, suppressed downstream insulin-mediated targets and AMP expression, and increased UTI susceptibility. Specifically, insulin receptor–mediated signaling regulates AMPs, including lipocalin 2 and ribonuclease 4, via phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase signaling. These data suggest that insulin signaling plays a critical role in renal antibacterial defenses.

Authors

Matthew J. Murtha, Tad Eichler, Kristin Bender, Jackie Metheny, Birong Li, Andrew L. Schwaderer, Claudia Mosquera, Cindy James, Laura Schwartz, Brian Becknell, John David Spencer

×

Figure 6

Insulin-mediated PI3K/AKT activation regulates AMP expression.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Insulin-mediated PI3K/AKT activation regulates AMP expression.
(A and B)...
(A and B) Lcn2 and RNase4 mRNA expression in mOMCD1, mIMCD3, and human renal epithelial cells treated with vehicle control (gray bars) or insulin (white bars) for 24 hours. AMP expression is derived from 3 independent experiments performed in triplicate (n = 3). Columns represent mean and SEM. Asterisks denote significant P values for the indicated pairwise comparisons (Student’s t test). (C) Representative Western blots probed for pAKT (ser473), RNase4, and GAPDH from human renal epithelial cells treated with insulin with or without wortmannin (wort). (D) ELISA quantitated Lcn2 concentrations in renal epithelial cell culture media following insulin with or without wortmannin treatment (n = 3). Columns represent mean and SEM. Asterisks indicate significant P values for the indicated pairwise comparison as determined by 1-way ANOVA with Tukey’s test. (E) Relative Lcn2 and Rnase4 mRNA expression in noninfected kidneys from wortmannin (striped bars) or vehicle-treated (white bars) C57BL/6J mice (n = 6 mice/treatment). (F) One hour before UPEC challenge, female C57BL/6J mice were treated with intraperitoneal wortmannin (squares) or vehicle control (circles). At 6 HPI, urine was collected, bladders were harvested, and UPEC colonies were enumerated. The horizontal line indicates the geometric mean. (E, F) Asterisks denote significant P values for the pairwise comparisons (Mann-Whitney U test). (G) Representative Western blots confirm wortmannin suppression of renal AKT (ser473) phosphorylation. Each lane shows kidney pAKT activity from a separate mouse. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts