Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Clinical innovation and scientific progress in GLP-1 medicine (Nov 2025)
    • Pancreatic Cancer (Jul 2025)
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Genetic regulation of the RUNX transcription factor family has antitumor effects
Ken Morita, … , Hiroshi Sugiyama, Yasuhiko Kamikubo
Ken Morita, … , Hiroshi Sugiyama, Yasuhiko Kamikubo
Published May 22, 2017
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 2017;127(7):2815-2828. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI91788.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Hematology Oncology

Genetic regulation of the RUNX transcription factor family has antitumor effects

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Runt-related transcription factor 1 (RUNX1) is generally considered to function as a tumor suppressor in the development of leukemia, but a growing body of evidence suggests that it has pro-oncogenic properties in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Here we have demonstrated that the antileukemic effect mediated by RUNX1 depletion is highly dependent on a functional p53-mediated cell death pathway. Increased expression of other RUNX family members, including RUNX2 and RUNX3, compensated for the antitumor effect elicited by RUNX1 silencing, and simultaneous attenuation of all RUNX family members as a cluster led to a much stronger antitumor effect relative to suppression of individual RUNX members. Switching off the RUNX cluster using alkylating agent–conjugated pyrrole-imidazole (PI) polyamides, which were designed to specifically bind to consensus RUNX-binding sequences, was highly effective against AML cells and against several poor-prognosis solid tumors in a xenograft mouse model of AML without notable adverse events. Taken together, these results identify a crucial role for the RUNX cluster in the maintenance and progression of cancer cells and suggest that modulation of the RUNX cluster using the PI polyamide gene-switch technology is a potential strategy to control malignancies.

Authors

Ken Morita, Kensho Suzuki, Shintaro Maeda, Akihiko Matsuo, Yoshihide Mitsuda, Chieko Tokushige, Gengo Kashiwazaki, Junichi Taniguchi, Rina Maeda, Mina Noura, Masahiro Hirata, Tatsuki Kataoka, Ayaka Yano, Yoshimi Yamada, Hiroki Kiyose, Mayu Tokumasu, Hidemasa Matsuo, Sunao Tanaka, Yasushi Okuno, Manabu Muto, Kazuhito Naka, Kosei Ito, Toshio Kitamura, Yasufumi Kaneda, Paul P. Liu, Toshikazu Bando, Souichi Adachi, Hiroshi Sugiyama, Yasuhiko Kamikubo

×

Figure 7

Antitumor activity of Chb-M′ in vivo.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Antitumor activity of Chb-M′ in vivo.
(A) Schematic representation of tr...
(A) Schematic representation of treatment schedule in xenotransplanted mice. (B) Overall survival of NOG mice transplanted with MV4-11 cells followed by treatment with DMSO, Ara-C, Chb-S, or with Chb-M′ (n = 7). P < 0.001, by log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test. (C) Overall survival of NOG mice transplanted with SU/SR cells followed by treatment with DMSO, imatinib, or with Chb-M′ (n = 5). P < 0.01, by log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test. (D and E) Human lung cancer xenotransplant model in NOG mice transplanted with A549 cells followed by treatment with DMSO, gefitinib, or with Chb-M′. (D) Overall survival of NOG mice (n = 5). P < 0.01, by log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test. (E) Live animal bioluminescence images at 7, 14, and 21 days after transplantation of A549 cells. Rainbow scale represents relative light units. (F and G) Human stomach cancer xenotransplant model in NOG mice transplanted with MKN45 cells followed by treatment with DMSO or with Chb-M′. (F) Tumor volume of NOG mice (n = 8). (G) Live animal bioluminescence images at 7, 14, and 21 days after transplantation of MKN45 cells. Rainbow scale represents relative light units. Data are the mean ± SEM values. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, by 2-tailed Student’s t test.

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts