Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Alerts
  • Advertising/recruitment
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Author's Takes
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • 100th Anniversary of Insulin's Discovery (Jan 2021)
    • Hypoxia-inducible factors in disease pathophysiology and therapeutics (Oct 2020)
    • Latency in Infectious Disease (Jul 2020)
    • Immunotherapy in Hematological Cancers (Apr 2020)
    • Big Data's Future in Medicine (Feb 2020)
    • Mechanisms Underlying the Metabolic Syndrome (Oct 2019)
    • Reparative Immunology (Jul 2019)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • Recently published
    • In-Press Preview
    • Commentaries
    • Concise Communication
    • Editorials
    • Viewpoint
    • Top read articles
  • Clinical Medicine
  • JCI This Month
    • Current issue
    • Past issues

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Author's Takes
  • Recently published
  • In-Press Preview
  • Commentaries
  • Concise Communication
  • Editorials
  • Viewpoint
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Alerts
  • Advertising/recruitment
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Targeting PPARγ in the epigenome rescues genetic metabolic defects in mice
Raymond E. Soccio, … , David J. Steger, Mitchell A. Lazar
Raymond E. Soccio, … , David J. Steger, Mitchell A. Lazar
Published February 27, 2017
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 2017;127(4):1451-1462. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI91211.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Endocrinology Metabolism

Targeting PPARγ in the epigenome rescues genetic metabolic defects in mice

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Obesity causes insulin resistance, and PPARγ ligands such as rosiglitazone are insulin sensitizing, yet the mechanisms remain unclear. In C57BL/6 (B6) mice, obesity induced by a high-fat diet (HFD) has major effects on visceral epididymal adipose tissue (eWAT). Here, we report that HFD-induced obesity in B6 mice also altered the activity of gene regulatory elements and genome-wide occupancy of PPARγ. Rosiglitazone treatment restored insulin sensitivity in obese B6 mice, yet, surprisingly, had little effect on gene expression in eWAT. However, in subcutaneous inguinal fat (iWAT), rosiglitazone markedly induced molecular signatures of brown fat, including the key thermogenic gene Ucp1. Obesity-resistant 129S1/SvImJ mice (129 mice) displayed iWAT browning, even in the absence of rosiglitazone. The 129 Ucp1 locus had increased PPARγ binding and gene expression that were preserved in the iWAT of B6x129 F1–intercrossed mice, with an imbalance favoring the 129-derived alleles, demonstrating a cis-acting genetic difference. Thus, B6 mice have genetically defective Ucp1 expression in iWAT. However, when Ucp1 was activated by rosiglitazone, or by iWAT browning in cold-exposed or young mice, expression of the B6 version of Ucp1 was no longer defective relative to the 129 version, indicating epigenomic rescue. These results provide a framework for understanding how environmental influences like drugs can affect the epigenome and potentially rescue genetically determined disease phenotypes.

Authors

Raymond E. Soccio, Zhenghui Li, Eric R. Chen, Yee Hoon Foong, Kiara K. Benson, Joanna R. Dispirito, Shannon E. Mullican, Matthew J. Emmett, Erika R. Briggs, Lindsey C. Peed, Richard K. Dzeng, Carlos J. Medina, Jennifer F. Jolivert, Megan Kissig, Satyajit R. Rajapurkar, Manashree Damle, Hee-Woong Lim, Kyoung-Jae Won, Patrick Seale, David J. Steger, Mitchell A. Lazar

×

Figure 6

Ucp1 mRNA expression favors 129 over B6 transcripts due to cis-acting effects.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint

Ucp1 mRNA expression favors 129 over B6 transcripts due to cis-acting e...
(A) To measure allelic imbalance at SNPs in the Ucp1 mRNA, qPCR products were used in SNaPshot assays (*P < 0.01 vs. gDNA, #P < 0.01 vs. BAT, by t test). (B) Male and female F1 mice were generated from reciprocal crosses (B6x129 mice have a B6 mother and 129xB6 mice have a 129 mother), and imbalanced mRNA expression of Ucp1 and the maternally imprinted gene Impact in iWAT were assayed by SNaPshot (*P < 0.01 vs. gDNA, by t test). (C) Primary adipocytes were differentiated from stromal vascular fractions of iWAT from B6, 129, and F1 mice. qPCR shows the relative expression of Ucp1 and Cidea normalized to TATA box–binding protein (Tbp) (*P < 0.01 vs. B6, by t test). (D) SNaPshot assay of Ucp1 allelic imbalance in cDNA from F1 primary adipocytes (*P < 0.01 vs. gDNA, by t test).
Follow JCI:
Copyright © 2021 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts