Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Pancreatic Cancer (Jul 2025)
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • Sex Differences in Medicine (Sep 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Top
  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal
  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Generating T cells for immunotherapy
  • To select or not to select — that is the question
  • Maintaining undifferentiated T cell populations
  • Conclusions and future directions
  • Footnotes
  • References
  • Version history
  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article

Advertisement

Commentary Free access | 10.1172/JCI85631

Selection bias: maintaining less-differentiated T cells for adoptive immunotherapy

Yang Xu and Gianpietro Dotti

Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Lineberger Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.

Address correspondence to: Gianpietro Dotti, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of North Carolina; Marsico Hall, 125 Mason Farm Road, Room 5202, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA. Phone: 919.962.8279; E-mail: gdotti@med.unc.edu.

Find articles by Xu, Y. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Lineberger Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.

Address correspondence to: Gianpietro Dotti, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of North Carolina; Marsico Hall, 125 Mason Farm Road, Room 5202, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA. Phone: 919.962.8279; E-mail: gdotti@med.unc.edu.

Find articles by Dotti, G. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

Published December 14, 2015 - More info

Published in Volume 126, Issue 1 on January 4, 2016
J Clin Invest. 2016;126(1):35–37. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI85631.
Copyright © 2016, American Society for Clinical Investigation
Published December 14, 2015 - Version history
View PDF

Related article:

Memory T cell–driven differentiation of naive cells impairs adoptive immunotherapy
Christopher A. Klebanoff, … , Richard M. Siegel, Nicholas P. Restifo
Christopher A. Klebanoff, … , Richard M. Siegel, Nicholas P. Restifo
Research Article Immunology Oncology

Memory T cell–driven differentiation of naive cells impairs adoptive immunotherapy

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Adoptive cell transfer (ACT) of purified naive, stem cell memory, and central memory T cell subsets results in superior persistence and antitumor immunity compared with ACT of populations containing more-differentiated effector memory and effector T cells. Despite a clear advantage of the less-differentiated populations, the majority of ACT trials utilize unfractionated T cell subsets. Here, we have challenged the notion that the mere presence of less-differentiated T cells in starting populations used to generate therapeutic T cells is sufficient to convey their desirable attributes. Using both mouse and human cells, we identified a T cell–T cell interaction whereby antigen-experienced subsets directly promote the phenotypic, functional, and metabolic differentiation of naive T cells. This process led to the loss of less-differentiated T cell subsets and resulted in impaired cellular persistence and tumor regression in mouse models following ACT. The T memory–induced conversion of naive T cells was mediated by a nonapoptotic Fas signal, resulting in Akt-driven cellular differentiation. Thus, induction of Fas signaling enhanced T cell differentiation and impaired antitumor immunity, while Fas signaling blockade preserved the antitumor efficacy of naive cells within mixed populations. These findings reveal that T cell subsets can synchronize their differentiation state in a process similar to quorum sensing in unicellular organisms and suggest that disruption of this quorum-like behavior among T cells has potential to enhance T cell–based immunotherapies.

Authors

Christopher A. Klebanoff, Christopher D. Scott, Anthony J. Leonardi, Tori N. Yamamoto, Anthony C. Cruz, Claudia Ouyang, Madhu Ramaswamy, Rahul Roychoudhuri, Yun Ji, Robert L. Eil, Madhusudhanan Sukumar, Joseph G. Crompton, Douglas C. Palmer, Zachary A. Borman, David Clever, Stacy K. Thomas, Shashankkumar Patel, Zhiya Yu, Pawel Muranski, Hui Liu, Ena Wang, Francesco M. Marincola, Alena Gros, Luca Gattinoni, Steven A. Rosenberg, Richard M. Siegel, Nicholas P. Restifo

×

Abstract

The clinical application of T cell immunotherapy depends on ex vivo modification and expansion of T cells for adoptive transfer. In preclinical models, the use of a purified, naive T cell subset enhances persistence and antitumor immunity; however, the majority of clinical studies rely on modification of mixed populations of T cells that contain only a small subset of highly functional T cells with less-differentiated phenotype. In this month’s issue of the JCI, Klebanoff and colleagues uncover a Fas-mediated interaction between naive T cells and antigen-experienced T cells that drives differentiation and impairs adoptive immunotherapy. Further, they show that blockade of Fas signaling enhances antitumor immunity and increases survival in a mouse model of melanoma. Their work supports a growing body of evidence that the use of naive T cells enhances the efficacy of adoptive T cell therapy and suggests a new therapeutic strategy for preserving less-differentiated T cell populations.

Generating T cells for immunotherapy

Adoptive transfer of T lymphocytes engineered to achieve tumor specificity through the genetic insertion of either T cell receptors or chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) allows remarkable control of disseminated tumors across multiple phase I/II clinical studies in the academic setting (1, 2). Some of these approaches are now further developed in multicenter studies supported by pharmaceutical companies. Manufacturing of engineered T cells is a key element for the realistic execution of multicenter clinical studies and for the future use of these cells in the clinical practice. Manufacturing of T cells is generally centralized to ensure reproducibility and aims at implementing standard operating procedures with minimized complexity. To this end, peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) are frequently preferred for generating engineered T cell products. PBMCs are indeed readily obtained by gradient centrifugation and contain all circulating T cell subsets, from naive T cells to memory T cells, susceptible to effective transduction by viral vectors encoding the transgene following activation with CD3/CD28 crosslinking antibodies and cytokines. Starting from PBMCs, T cell products can be obtained within two weeks of ex vivo culture, a time schedule compatible with an effective clinical application in many patients with refractory and resistant malignancies.

To select or not to select — that is the question

In the current issue of the JCI, Klebanoff et al. highlight that the complexity of the immune system may not be easily recapitulated using simplified approaches and that a more sophisticated manipulation of T cell subsets within the infused T cell products may affect clinical outcome (3). This last observation stems from a long history of mouse model studies showing how less-differentiated T cell subsets from naive T cells (TN cells) to central memory T cells (TCM cells) display superior antitumor capacity and persistence compared with more-differentiated T cells, such as effector-memory T cells (TEM cells) or effector T cells (TE cells) (4). More recently, another subset of memory T cells, identified as T stem cell memory cells (TSCM cells), claims properties superior even to TN and TCM cells (5). Clinical observations corroborate the relevance of preserving primitive T cell subsets within infused T cell products to ensure T cell expansion and potentially long-term engraftment (6, 7).

The composition of T cell subsets found in PBMCs of cancer patients is largely affected by several factors, including age, disease, and type of chemotherapy treatments received before blood procurement. All these factors contribute to creating very heterogeneous T cell products when whole PBMCs are used as a starting material. One could argue that the high response rate in both adult and pediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia infused with CD19-specific CAR–T cells supports the use of PBMCs as a starting source of T cells, regardless of their heterogeneity, as they contain all the T cell subsets needed for an effective immune response (2, 8, 9). However, a more precise composition of the T cell products and in particular the enrichment in T cells with the highest potential for engraftment may become particularly relevant in other clinical settings, specifically in most solid tumors, in which the response rate to adoptive T cell therapies is currently significantly inferior compared with that for lymphoblastic leukemia.

Maintaining undifferentiated T cell populations

How can we preserve more immature and bona fide highly functional T cell subsets within infusion products without applying complex standard operating procedures? Activation, genetic manipulation, and ex vivo expansion of T cells inevitably induce their differentiation. This differentiation process can be stalled through manipulations during the expansion phase using cytokines, such as IL-7 and IL-15 instead of IL-2, to preserve more TSCM cells (7, 10). In addition, activation of the Wnt-signaling pathway has been implied to delay T cell differentiation (11, 12). However, in the current issue of the JCI, Klebanoff et al. further elucidate the complexity of T cell interactions in vitro showing in both mouse and human that memory T cells (TMEM cells) actively induce “precocious differentiation” of TN cells when they are activated and expanded together. In the presence of TMEM cells, TN cell progenies acquire enhanced effector functions, such as expression of granzyme B and the ability to produce IFN-γ upon restimulation. TMEM cells also mediate global transcriptional modulation in TN cells, downregulating the expression of lymphoid-homing chemokine receptors (CD62L and CCR7) and memory-associated transcription factors. Overall, this leads to a reduction in antitumor efficacy of TN cell progeny expanded in the presence of TMEM cells.

This observation suggests that, to preserve the intrinsic properties of TN cell progenies, engineered T cells should be generated exclusively from TN cells selected from PBMCs (Figure 1). This mirrors the approach proposed by other investigators who optimized the selection of TCM cells for engineering purposes (13). However, the mechanistic model proposed by Klebanoff et al. still keeps open the possibility of manipulating the culture conditions of unselected PBMCs to disrupt the signaling pathways that promote the precocious differentiation of TN cells. They found indeed that TMEM cells mediate the differentiation of TN cells through Fas ligand (FasL) expressed by activated TMEM cells interacting with Fas on activated TN cells. Preventing Fas-FasL interaction by FasL-blocking antibodies or genetic ablation of Fas on TN cells restores the primitive TSCM and TCM cell populations in the TN cell progeny. In addition, provision of FasL alone is sufficient to promote TN cell precocious differentiation in the absence of TMEM cells. Fas-FasL interaction induces the extrinsic apoptosis pathway via caspase 8. Interestingly, the precocious differentiation of TN cells induced by TMEM cells does not induce a cell death pathway, but instead depends on activation of Akt signaling and metabolic modulation. TN cells expanded with TMEM cells show elevated activation of Akt and glycolytic activity, a phenomenon that can be recapitulated by the addition of FasL. Inhibition of Akt activation reverses the precocious differentiation, raising the possibility of pharmacologic modulation of this process.

Schematic representation of the generation of engineered T cells for adoptiFigure 1

Schematic representation of the generation of engineered T cells for adoptive immunotherapy. Unfractionated PBMCs containing TN, TSCM,TCM, and TEM cells are frequently used as starting material to generate gene-manipulated T cell products for adoptive immunotherapy in cancer patients. To preserve more immature T cell subsets, the manipulation of culture conditions by using different cocktails of cytokines or by activating or inhibiting specific pathways has been developed. In the current issue of the JCI, Klebanoff et al. suggest that the selection of TN cells from PBMCs may represent the most effective strategy to preserve more immature T cell subsets in T cell products.

Conclusions and future directions

It remains unknown whether there is crosstalk among the mixed populations of TEM, TCM, and TSCM cells present in the infused products. Moreover, since CD4+ T cells are also present in unfractionated PBMCs and play a role in promoting the survival of engineered T cells (14), determining whether this quorum-sensing phenomenon exists within the CD4 subset would greatly benefit the manufacturing of T cell products. In addition to the application in cancer immunotherapy, this uncovered crosstalk between TMEM and TN cells may represent a physiologic immunoregulatory mechanism to favor TE cell differentiation over immune memory formation. Priming of TN cells in the presence of preexisting antigen-experienced T cells may be a signal for chronic persistent infection. Clearance of antigen by TE cells in this situation may be the priority over establishment of long-lived memory T cells. Moreover, since the ratio of TMEM to TN cells gradually increases with age, due to reduced output of TN cells from thymus, the discovered crosstalk between these subsets could be exploited to improve vaccination approaches in aged individuals.

Footnotes

Conflict of interest: The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.

Reference information: J Clin Invest. 2016;126(1):35–37. doi:10.1172/JCI85631.

See the related article at Memory T cell–driven differentiation of naive cells impairs adoptive immunotherapy.

References
  1. Robbins PF, et al. Tumor regression in patients with metastatic synovial cell sarcoma and melanoma using genetically engineered lymphocytes reactive with NY-ESO-1. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(7):917–924.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  2. Maude SL, Teachey DT, Porter DL, Grupp SA. CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy for acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood. 2015;125(26):4017–4023.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  3. Klebanoff CA, et al. Memory T cell–driven differentiation of naive cells impairs adoptive immunotherapy. J Clin Invest. 2016;126(1):318–334.
  4. Gattinoni L, et al. Acquisition of full effector function in vitro paradoxically impairs the in vivo antitumor efficacy of adoptively transferred CD8+ T cells. J Clin Invest. 2005;115(6):1616–1626.
    View this article via: JCI PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  5. Gattinoni L, et al. A human memory T cell subset with stem cell-like properties. Nat Med. 2011;17(10):1290–1297.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  6. Powell DJ. Transition of late-stage effector T cells to CD27+ CD28+ tumor-reactive effector memory T cells in humans after adoptive cell transfer therapy. Blood. 2005;105(1):241–250.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  7. Xu Y, et al. Closely related T-memory stem cells correlate with in vivo expansion of CAR. Blood. 2014;123(24):3750–3759.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  8. Brentjens RJ, et al. CD19-targeted T cells rapidly induce molecular remissions in adults with chemotherapy-refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Sci Transl Med. 2013;5(177):177ra38.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  9. Lee DW, et al. T cells expressing CD19 chimeric antigen receptors for acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in children and young adults: a phase 1 dose-escalation trial. Lancet. 2015;385(9967):517–528.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  10. Cieri N, et al. IL-7 and IL-15 instruct the generation of human memory stem T cells from naive precursors. Blood. 2013;121(4):573–584.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  11. Muralidharan S, et al. Activation of Wnt signaling arrests effector differentiation in human peripheral and cord blood-derived T lymphocytes. J Immunol. 2011;187(10):5221–5232.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  12. Gattinoni L, et al. Wnt signaling arrests effector T cell differentiation and generates CD8+ memory stem cells. Nat Med. 2009;15(7):808–813.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  13. Wang X, Berger C, Wong CW, Forman SJ, Riddell SR, Jensen MC. Engraftment of human central memory-derived effector CD8+ T cells in immunodeficient mice. Blood. 2011;117(6):1888–1898.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  14. Louis CU, et al. Antitumor activity and long-term fate of chimeric antigen receptor-positive T cells in patients with neuroblastoma. Blood. 2011;118(23):6050–6056.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
Version history
  • Version 1 (December 14, 2015): No description
  • Version 2 (January 4, 2016): Corrected reference to research article.

Article tools

  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal

Metrics

  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article

Go to

  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Generating T cells for immunotherapy
  • To select or not to select — that is the question
  • Maintaining undifferentiated T cell populations
  • Conclusions and future directions
  • Footnotes
  • References
  • Version history
Advertisement
Advertisement

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts