Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • ASCI Milestone Awards
    • Video Abstracts
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Clinical innovation and scientific progress in GLP-1 medicine (Nov 2025)
    • Pancreatic Cancer (Jul 2025)
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • ASCI Milestone Awards
  • Video Abstracts
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Nuclear pore protein NUP88 activates anaphase-promoting complex to promote aneuploidy
Ryan M. Naylor, Karthik B. Jeganathan, Xiuqi Cao, Jan M. van Deursen
Ryan M. Naylor, Karthik B. Jeganathan, Xiuqi Cao, Jan M. van Deursen
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Oncology

Nuclear pore protein NUP88 activates anaphase-promoting complex to promote aneuploidy

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

The nuclear pore complex protein NUP88 is frequently elevated in aggressive human cancers and correlates with reduced patient survival; however, it is unclear whether and how NUP88 overexpression drives tumorigenesis. Here, we show that mice overexpressing NUP88 are cancer prone and form intestinal tumors. To determine whether overexpression of NUP88 drives tumorigenesis, we engineered transgenic mice with doxycycline-inducible expression of Nup88. Surprisingly, NUP88 overexpression did not alter global nuclear transport, but was a potent inducer of aneuploidy and chromosomal instability. We determined that NUP88 and the nuclear transport factors NUP98 and RAE1 comprise a regulatory network that inhibits premitotic activity of the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C). When overexpressed, NUP88 sequesters NUP98-RAE1 away from APC/CCDH1, triggering proteolysis of polo-like kinase 1 (PLK1), a tumor suppressor and multitasking mitotic kinase. Premitotic destruction of PLK1 disrupts centrosome separation, causing mitotic spindle asymmetry, merotelic microtubule-kinetochore attachments, lagging chromosomes, and aneuploidy. These effects were replicated by PLK1 insufficiency, indicating that PLK1 is responsible for the mitotic defects associated with NUP88 overexpression. These findings demonstrate that the NUP88-NUP98-RAE1-APC/CCDH1 axis contributes to aneuploidy and suggest that it may be deregulated in the initiating stages of a broad spectrum of human cancers.

Authors

Ryan M. Naylor, Karthik B. Jeganathan, Xiuqi Cao, Jan M. van Deursen

×

Figure 7

Centrosome separation is defective in Nup88T and Nup98+/− Rae1+/− MEFs.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Centrosome separation is defective in Nup88T and Nup98+/− Rae1+/− MEFs.
...
(A) Images of Nup88T MEFs immunostained for γ-tubulin and p-HH3 (Ser10). (B) Quantification of the incidence of G2-phase cells of the indicated genotypes with unseparated centrosomes treated with or without BI2536. (C) Same as in B. (D) Schematic representation of spindle geometric measurements and representative images of metaphases immunostained for α-tubulin and γ-tubulin with the indicated spindle angle. (E) Quantification of spindle geometric abnormalities for MEFs of the indicated genotypes. (F) Same as in E. DNA in A and D was visualized with Hoechst. Quantifications in B, C, E, and F were performed on 3 independent lines per genotype (20 cells/line). Data represent the mean ± SEM. Statistical significance in B and C was determined using a 1-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. Statistical significance in E and F was determined using a 2-tailed, unpaired t test. *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01. Scale bars: 10 μm. Nup88T indicates the combined transgenic lines 11 and 13.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts