Usage Information

MLL1 and DOT1L cooperate with meningioma-1 to induce acute myeloid leukemia
Simone S. Riedel, Jessica N. Haladyna, Matthew Bezzant, Brett Stevens, Daniel A. Pollyea, Amit U. Sinha, Scott A. Armstrong, Qi Wei, Roy M. Pollock, Scott R. Daigle, Craig T. Jordan, Patricia Ernst, Tobias Neff, Kathrin M. Bernt
Simone S. Riedel, Jessica N. Haladyna, Matthew Bezzant, Brett Stevens, Daniel A. Pollyea, Amit U. Sinha, Scott A. Armstrong, Qi Wei, Roy M. Pollock, Scott R. Daigle, Craig T. Jordan, Patricia Ernst, Tobias Neff, Kathrin M. Bernt
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Oncology

MLL1 and DOT1L cooperate with meningioma-1 to induce acute myeloid leukemia

Abstract

Meningioma-1 (MN1) overexpression is frequently observed in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and is predictive of poor prognosis. In murine models, forced expression of MN1 in hematopoietic progenitors induces an aggressive myeloid leukemia that is strictly dependent on a defined gene expression program in the cell of origin, which includes the homeobox genes Hoxa9 and Meis1 as key components. Here, we have shown that this program is controlled by two histone methyltransferases, MLL1 and DOT1L, as deletion of either Mll1 or Dot1l in MN1-expressing cells abrogated the cell of origin–derived gene expression program, including the expression of Hoxa cluster genes. In murine models, genetic inactivation of either Mll1 or Dot1l impaired MN1-mediated leukemogenesis. We determined that HOXA9 and MEIS1 are coexpressed with MN1 in a subset of clinical MN1hi leukemia, and human MN1hi/HOXA9hi leukemias were sensitive to pharmacologic inhibition of DOT1L. Together, these data point to DOT1L as a potential therapeutic target in MN1hi AML. In addition, our findings suggest that epigenetic modulation of the interplay between an oncogenic lesion and its cooperating developmental program has therapeutic potential in AML.

Authors

Simone S. Riedel, Jessica N. Haladyna, Matthew Bezzant, Brett Stevens, Daniel A. Pollyea, Amit U. Sinha, Scott A. Armstrong, Qi Wei, Roy M. Pollock, Scott R. Daigle, Craig T. Jordan, Patricia Ernst, Tobias Neff, Kathrin M. Bernt

×

Usage data is cumulative from July 2025 through July 2026.

Usage JCI PMC
Text version 884 59
PDF 222 12
Figure 810 7
Supplemental data 367 7
Citation downloads 152 0
Totals 2,435 85
Total Views 2,520
(Click and drag on plot area to zoom in. Click legend items above to toggle)

Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.

Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.

Advertisement