Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • Sex Differences in Medicine (Sep 2024)
    • Vascular Malformations (Apr 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Liver sinusoidal endothelial cell progenitor cells promote liver regeneration in rats
Lin Wang, … , Colin K. Hill, Laurie D. DeLeve
Lin Wang, … , Colin K. Hill, Laurie D. DeLeve
Published March 12, 2012
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 2012;122(4):1567-1573. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI58789.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Hepatology

Liver sinusoidal endothelial cell progenitor cells promote liver regeneration in rats

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

The ability of the liver to regenerate is crucial to protect liver function after injury and during chronic disease. Increases in hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) in liver sinusoidal endothelial cells (LSECs) are thought to drive liver regeneration. However, in contrast to endothelial progenitor cells, mature LSECs express little HGF. Therefore, we sought to establish in rats whether liver injury causes BM LSEC progenitor cells to engraft in the liver and provide increased levels of HGF and to examine the relative contribution of resident and BM LSEC progenitors. LSEC label-retaining cells and progenitors were identified in liver and LSEC progenitors in BM. BM LSEC progenitors did not contribute to normal LSEC turnover in the liver. However, after partial hepatectomy, BM LSEC progenitor proliferation and mobilization to the circulation doubled. In the liver, one-quarter of the LSECs were BM derived, and BM LSEC progenitors differentiated into fenestrated LSECs. When irradiated rats underwent partial hepatectomy, liver regeneration was compromised, but infusion of LSEC progenitors rescued the defect. Further analysis revealed that BM LSEC progenitors expressed substantially more HGF and were more proliferative than resident LSEC progenitors after partial hepatectomy. Resident LSEC progenitors within their niche may play a smaller role in recovery from partial hepatectomy than BM LSEC progenitors, but, when infused after injury, these progenitors engrafted and expanded markedly over a 2-month period. In conclusion, LSEC progenitor cells are present in liver and BM, and recruitment of BM LSEC progenitors is necessary for normal liver regeneration.

Authors

Lin Wang, Xiangdong Wang, Guanhua Xie, Lei Wang, Colin K. Hill, Laurie D. DeLeve

×

Figure 4

Proliferation, mobilization, engraftment, and differentiation of BM SPCs after PHx.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Proliferation, mobilization, engraftment, and differentiation of BM SPCs...
(A) Peak of LSEC proliferation after PHx was examined by PCNA immunostaining in LSECs isolated from sham-operated rats on days 1–4 after PHx. n = 3; ***P < 0.001 compared with sham control. (B) Proliferation of BM SPCs. FACS analysis of PCNA+ BM SPCs on PHx day 3 and sham controls. **P < 0.005 compared with sham surgery. (C) Mobilization. BM SPCs in peripheral blood (PB) were counted on PHx day 3. n = 4; *P < 0.05 compared with sham surgery control. (D–F) Engraftment of BM SPCs. LSECs were isolated on PHx day 3 from rats that had undergone gender-mismatched (male into female) BM transplantation and subsequent PHx. BM-derived LSECs were identified by FISH staining for Y chromosome (arrows) in (D) sham surgery control and (E) after PHx. Original magnification, ×100. (F) Engraftment data from 3 individual experiments. ***P < 0.001 compared with sham surgery control. (G) Engraftment of BM SPCs. Wild-type rats were transplanted with BM from Lew-Tg(CAG-EGFP)ys rats. Isolation of LSECs on PHx day 3, followed by FACS for GFP, demonstrated that 24.6% ± 3.1% of LSECs were GFP+ and therefore BM derived (n = 3). (H) Differentiation of BM SPCs to LSECs. Wild-type rats received BM transplantation from Lew-Tg(CAG-EGFP)ys rats. BM-derived LSECs (GFP+) were isolated 2 weeks after PHx and examined by scanning EM for fenestration. The black circle demonstrates characteristic fenestrae. Original magnification, ×5,000; scale bar: 5 μm. Note that SPCs isolated from BM were not fenestrated (data not shown).

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts