Advertisement
Review Series Free access | 10.1172/JCI46044
University of Cambridge Metabolic Research Laboratories, Institute of Metabolic Science, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Address correspondence to: I. Sadaf Farooqi, University of Cambridge Metabolic Research Laboratories, Institute of Metabolic Science, Box 289, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom. Phone: 44.1223.762.634; Fax: 44.1223.762.657; E-mail: isf20@cam.ac.uk.
Find articles by Ramachandrappa, S. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
University of Cambridge Metabolic Research Laboratories, Institute of Metabolic Science, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Address correspondence to: I. Sadaf Farooqi, University of Cambridge Metabolic Research Laboratories, Institute of Metabolic Science, Box 289, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom. Phone: 44.1223.762.634; Fax: 44.1223.762.657; E-mail: isf20@cam.ac.uk.
Find articles by Farooqi, I. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
Published June 1, 2011 - More info
Obesity and its associated comorbidities represent one of the biggest public health challenges facing the world today. The heritability of body weight is high, and genetic variation plays a major role in determining the interindividual differences in susceptibility or resistance to the obesogenic environment. Here we discuss how genetic studies in humans have contributed to our understanding of the central pathways that govern energy homeostasis. We discuss how the arrival of technological advances such as next-generation sequencing will result in a major acceleration in the pace of gene discovery. The study of patients harboring these genetic variants has informed our understanding of the molecular and physiological pathways involved in energy homeostasis. We anticipate that future studies will provide the framework for the development of a more rational targeted approach to the prevention and treatment of genetically susceptible individuals.
The rising prevalence of obesity and associated comorbidities such as type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and certain cancers represents a major threat to public health worldwide (1). On a global level, changes in environmental factors undoubtedly drive the rise in the prevalence of obesity. However, one remarkable feature of the “obesity epidemic” is the persistence of considerable individual variation in body weight within a population that shares the same environment (2).
There is strong evidence that within a population the variance in BMI (weight in kg/height in meters squared) is largely genetically determined (3), with heritability estimates ranging between 40% and 70% (4). In a Swedish study of twins reared apart, within-pair correlations for BMI were 0.70 for male and 0.66 for female monozygotic twins (5, 6). Recent studies in twins born after the recent increase in the prevalence of obesity have estimated the heritability of BMI at 77% (7). Further evidence comes from studies of adopted children, whose weight correlates better with that of their biological parents than with that of their adoptive parents with whom they share the childhood environment (8). Overfeeding studies have shown that the weight gain in response to positive energy balance differs across sets of identical twins but is similar between members of a twin pair (9, 10).
Given the estimated heritability of BMI, genetic approaches can be a useful tool with which to dissect the mechanisms involved in weight regulation and understand the susceptibility to obesity. To date, a number of contrasting experimental approaches have been used to identify human obesity-associated genes, including linkage studies, association studies, and candidate gene studies (ref. 3 and Table 1).
Candidate gene studies based on the molecules known to cause severe obesity in experimental animals have shown that these genes also contribute to childhood onset human obesity. The foundation for this work was laid by elegant physiological studies showing that the regulation of body weight is a homeostatic process (11), which has been demonstrated by chemical and electrolytic lesioning studies to be critically regulated at the level of the hypothalamus (12, 13). Parabiosis experiments in inbred strains of mice with severe obesity, such as ob/ob and db/db, suggested the existence of a circulating factor that regulates weight (14). The identification of this hormone, leptin, through positional cloning of the ob gene and the finding that this was mutated in severely obese ob/ob mice (15) paved the way for the molecular and physiological circuits controlling energy homeostasis to be dissected. Leptin is a 16-kDa hormone whose circulating levels correlate closely with fat mass (16, 17). Prolonged fasting results in a fall in leptin levels, which triggers a series of changes in energy intake, energy expenditure, and neuroendocrine function in order to maintain energy homeostasis (18). Many of the physiological effects of leptin are mediated through the central nervous system, particularly the hypothalamus, which is the site of the highest mRNA expression of the long isoform of the leptin receptor (19, 20). Studies by many groups have demonstrated that leptin stimulates the expression of pro-opiomelanocortin (POMC) in primary neurons located in the arcuate nucleus of the hypothalamus. POMC is extensively posttranslationally modified to generate the melanocortin peptides, which activate the melanocortin receptors to modulate diverse functions in the central nervous system, the adrenal gland, and skin (21, 22). The melanocortins are agonists at melanocortin receptors and suppress food intake. In addition, leptin inhibits orexigenic pathways, mediated by neurons expressing the melanocortin antagonist Agouti-related protein and neuropeptide Y (NPY); NPY can suppress the expression of POMC. These two sets of primary leptin-responsive neurons project to second-order neurons expressing the melanocortin 4 receptor (MC4R). Targeted genetic disruption of MC4R in mice leads to increased food intake and increased lean mass and linear growth (23). These hypothalamic pathways interact with other brain centers to coordinate appetite and modulate efferent signals to the periphery, regulating intermediary metabolism and energy expenditure.
We and others have demonstrated that human obesity can result from a multiplicity of defects in the leptin/melanocortin pathway. In this review we will focus on the physiological effects of genetic disruption of these and other obesity-associated genes.
Homozygous frameshift, nonsense, and missense mutations of the leptin gene (LEP) have been identified, which result in an inability to produce leptin; patients with such LEP mutations are severely obese from a young age, and their LEP levels are below the lower limit of detection (24–26). Congenital leptin deficiency can be successfully treated with daily injections of recombinant human leptin, correcting all the metabolic abnormalities seen in these patients (27, 28). Up to 3% of patients with severe obesity have been found to harbor loss-of-function mutations in the LEP receptor (LEPR) (29). The clinical phenotypes associated with congenital deficiency of either leptin or its receptor are very similar (29, 30) and illustrate that, in humans, leptin is a key regulator of energy intake and eating behavior, energy expenditure, neuroendocrine function, and immunity.
Regulation of energy intake. Leptin- and leptin receptor–deficient subjects are born of normal birth weight but exhibit rapid weight gain in the first few months of life, which results in severe obesity. The key features are an intense drive to eat (hyperphagia), with aggressive behavior when food is denied, as well as impaired satiety, with food-seeking behavior initiating soon after the end of a meal (28). The major effect of leptin administration is on food intake, with normalization of hyperphagia and enhanced satiety (28, 31). Leptin is also involved in mediating food reward. We used functional MRI scans to measure changes in blood flow, which reflect changes in neuronal activation, in response to the visual presentation of pictures of food versus pictures of non-food items (32). In the leptin-deficient state, images of food (compared to non-food images) were associated with a marked increase in neuronal activation in the ventral striatum, an area associated with pleasure and reward. This response was normalized by seven days of leptin treatment (32). Our findings are consistent with the view that activation in the ventral striatum does not directly encode the “liking” but rather the motivational salience, or “wanting”, of food. Recent studies by Rosenbaum, Leibel, and colleagues in obese volunteers in an energy-restricted, partially leptin-deficient state, are consistent with the view that these responses are part of the physiological response to reduced body weight (33). In rodents, leptin receptors are expressed in the mesolimbic system, which is thought to mediate the rewarding properties of food and drugs (34). Leptin administration decreases the firing threshold of dopaminergic neurons within this system, and knockdown of leptin receptors on these neurons has been shown to increase food intake (35).
Regulation of energy expenditure and fat oxidation. In leptin-deficient children and adults, basal metabolic rate, total energy expenditure, and free-living energy expenditure are appropriate for body composition of these patients (28, 31). We have shown that leptin administration does not result in a change in energy expenditure; however, as weight loss by other means is associated with a decrease in basal metabolic rate, the absence of an effect is notable (28). Ravussin and colleagues confirmed this in elegant studies of 24-hour energy expenditure and fat oxidation in three leptin-deficient obese adults before and after weight loss and three obese controls pair-matched for gender, age, and BMI, in whom weight loss was induced by a 10- to 21-week low-calorie diet (36). Before weight loss, leptin-deficient and matched controls had similar energy expenditures. However, after weight loss, controls had energy expenditures lower than expected for their new weight and body composition. This is a well-known phenomenon, often called the metabolic adaptation to weight loss, i.e., a decrease in metabolic rate beyond that expected on the basis of the decrease in fat-free mass and fat mass. Further studies in obese volunteers following energy restriction support the conclusion that leptin does affect energy expenditure in humans (37), as the fall in energy expenditure seen after 10% weight loss is attenuated by the administration of leptin.
Body composition measurements show that leptin deficiency is characterized by the preferential deposition of fat mass (compared with lean mass), and weight loss leads to a preferential loss of fat mass (28). In rodents, leptin stimulates fatty acid oxidation in skeletal muscle via the stimulation of AMP kinase activity (38). In leptin-deficient humans, impaired fat oxidation has been demonstrated by chamber calorimetry (36). How might effects on energy expenditure and fat oxidation be mediated in humans? Ozata and colleagues have reported abnormalities of sympathetic nerve function in leptin-deficient adults consistent with defects in the efferent sympathetic limb of thermogenesis (39). Also relevant to the regulation of human energy expenditure are changes in thyroid function seen in patients with leptin deficiency (25). Evidence from rodents suggests that leptin is necessary for the normal biosynthesis and secretion of thyrotropin-releasing hormone and that complete leptin deficiency is associated with a moderate degree of hypothalamic hypothyroidism characterized by low free thyroxine and high serum thyroid-stimulating hormone, which is bio-inactive. Similar effects are seen in weight-reduced humans and are reversed by leptin administration (40).
Leptin as a metabolic gate for the onset of puberty. Leptin deficiency is associated with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism and a failure of normal pubertal development (26). The administration of leptin permits progression of appropriately timed pubertal development, suggesting that leptin is a permissive factor for the development of puberty in humans (28, 31). However, there is some evidence for the delayed but spontaneous onset of menses in some leptin receptor–deficient adults (29); it is plausible that in these patients, the excess adipose tissue mass leads to the production of sufficient estrogen (due to the action of aromatase), to result in uterine development and irregular menses in the absence of fully developed secondary sexual characteristics. Leptin may exert these effects on the reproductive system through a number of molecules including kisspeptin, which signals through GPR54, to modify the release of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (41), and through specific neural pathways involving the ventral premamillary nucleus (42).
Leptin as a mediator of the nutritional regulation of immune function. Leptin stimulates inflammatory responses, T lymphocyte proliferation, and Th1 cytokine production during fasting in normal mice and in ob/ob mice, indicating that it is an important link between nutrition and the immune system. Recent studies have shown that leptin is also involved in mediating the systemic response to sepsis (43) and in parasitic diseases (44). Patients with leptin deficiency have an increased frequency of infections and marked abnormalities of T cell number and function in vitro, which are normalized with leptin treatment (28, 31). The multiple effects of leptin on innate and adaptive immunity suggest that immunomodulation by leptin may have therapeutic potential in a range of human diseases (45).
Leptin signaling modulates energy balance through a combination of melanocortin-dependent and -independent pathways. In humans, null mutations in POMC lead to hyperphagia, early-onset obesity, isolated adrenocorticotrophin (ACTH) deficiency, and hypopigmentation of skin and hair (46–48). Heterozygous carriers of null mutations have a significantly higher risk of being obese or overweight (48). This is particularly relevant, as we and others have described a number of heterozygous point mutations in POMC and loss-of-function mutations in α– and β–melanocyte-stimulating hormone (α- and β-MSH), which significantly increase obesity risk but are not invariably associated with obesity (49, 50). These studies support a previously unrecognized role for β-MSH in the control of human energy homeostasis. Through the detailed functional characterization of obesity-associated mutations, we were able to show a role for the N terminus of POMC in the sorting and secretion of POMC-derived peptides (51).
Prohormone convertase 1 (PCSK1) is an enzyme involved in the cleavage of POMC into ACTH, which is then further cleaved to make α-MSH by carboxypeptidase E. Humans lacking PCSK1 are severely obese and have glucocorticoid deficiency, hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, and postprandial hypoglycemia, which occurs as a result of impaired processing of proinsulin to insulin (52, 53). Elevated plasma levels of proinsulin and 32–33 split proinsulin in the context of low levels of mature insulin provide the basis for a diagnostic test for this disorder. A prominent clinical feature of affected individuals is severe absorptive dysfunction of the small intestine in neonatal life (53, 54), which is likely to be attributable to impaired processing of propeptides within the enteroendocrine cells and nerves that express PCSK1 throughout the gut (53).
We and others have reported that mutations in MC4R are found in 5%–6% of patients with severe early-onset obesity (55) and at a frequency of approximately 1/1,000 in the general UK population (56), making this one of the most common human monogenic diseases (57, 58). Functionally significant MC4R mutations are inherited in a codominant manner, with variable penetrance and expression in heterozygous carriers (55, 59). Most naturally occurring disease-causing MC4R mutations disrupt normal expression and trafficking of the receptor to the cell surface (58, 60). As a result of this growing body of information, assessment of the sequence of the MC4R is increasingly seen as a necessary part of the clinical evaluation of the severely obese child (61). The mechanism of GPCR dysfunction has potential interest, as we have shown that pharmacological chaperones can increase the cell surface expression and signalling of mutant GPCRs (62).
Regulation of energy intake, energy expenditure, and fat oxidation. We have previously characterized human MC4R deficiency and reported hyperphagia, increased lean mass, and increased linear growth and demonstrated a genotype-phenotype correlation with the degree of receptor dysfunction in vitro predicting all aspects of the phenotype, including ad libitum energy intake (55). These features are also seen in patients with heterozygous mutations that affect the production of α- and β-MSH (49). Further studies established that MC4R plays a role in fat oxidation and nutrient partitioning. These effects are also seen in rodents and appear to be mainly mediated by the sympathetic nervous system. Retrograde viral tracing of the origins of sympathetic outflow to white adipose tissue (WAT) depots has identified several hypothalamic areas expressing MC4R, in particular the PVN, as sites of presympathetic neurons that project to WAT (63). Furthermore, intracerebroventricular administration of melanocortin agonists has been shown to increase sympathetic nervous activity in WAT and modulate triacylglycerol metabolism to promote lipid mobilization (63). Central pharmacological MCR blockade leads to less weight gain in triple (β1/β2/β3) adrenergic knockout mice than in wild-type mice, suggesting that reducing sympathetic tone to WAT, which directly promotes fat accumulation, may be an important mechanism by which MC4R deficiency leads to obesity (63).
Regulation of sympathetic tone and blood pressure. Acute central administration of α-MSH increases mean arterial pressure and heart rate in rodents. Chronic pharmacologic blockade of MC3R and MC4R causes weight gain and a reduction in heart rate but no increase in arterial pressure. Mc4r-null mice maintain normal blood pressure despite marked obesity and are unresponsive to the pressor effects of central α-MSH administration (64). We have shown that both increases and decreases in central melanocortin signaling influence blood pressure in humans and that the effects are not explained by changes in circulating insulin levels or insulin sensitivity (65). MC4R-deficient patients with long-standing decreases in melanocortinergic tone have a lower prevalence of hypertension and lower systolic and diastolic blood pressures. These changes are associated with reduced sympathetic nervous system activity (65). Also, administration of a melanocortin receptor agonist in obese volunteers increases blood pressure (65). Thus, central melanocortin signalling appears to play an important role in the regulation of blood pressure and its coupling to changes in weight (66).
Regulation of linear growth. Mutations in POMC and MC4R are associated with accelerated linear growth that is disproportionate to the degree of obesity. Hyperinsulinemia is seen in very young MC4R-deficient children, persists throughout childhood, and is likely to be a major mediator of the increased linear growth (55). Whereas pulsatile growth hormone (GH) secretion is suppressed in obese controls, GH levels were not completely suppressed in MC4R-deficient adults (67), suggesting that the suppression of pulsatile GH secretion in obesity is mediated by signaling through MC4R. GH secretion is under the reciprocal control of the hypothalamic hormones GH-releasing hormone (GHRH), which determines the amplitude of the GH peak, and somatostatin, which determines the trough levels of GH by inhibiting GHRH release and GH secretion. Although there have been no studies of GH release in Mc4r-knockout mice, the somatotroph axis has been studied in the agouti mouse, which overexpresses Agouti protein, a natural antagonist at Mc4r. Martin et al. showed that although Ghrh mRNA expression in the arcuate nucleus of obese agouti mice was unchanged, somatostatin peptide content and somatostatin mRNA levels in the periventricular nucleus were reduced to 50% of wild-type levels (68). The neural networks that mediate the coupling of these pathways need to be elucidated.
Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) is one of several nerve growth factors which activate signaling by the tyrosine kinase receptor tropomycin-related kinase B (TrkB). Infusion of BDNF reduces food intake in models of MC4R deficiency, suggesting that BDNF/TrkB signaling may lie distal to MC4R signaling (69). Haploinsufficient mice and mice in which BDNF has been deleted postnatally are obese with hyperphagia and hyperactivity. We reported a child with severe obesity, impaired short-term memory, and developmental delay who had a de novo missense mutation impairing the function of TrkB (70). We have also identified a patient with a de novo chromosomal inversion, 46,XX,inv(11)(p13p15.3), which encompasses the BDNF locus and disrupts BDNF expression (71). Yanovski and colleagues showed that in patients with WAGR syndrome, a subset of deletions encompassing the BDNF locus were associated with early-onset obesity (72).
Another molecule thought to lie downstream of MC4R-expressing neurons is single minded 1 (SIM1), a transcription factor involved in the development of the paraventricular and supraoptic nuclei of the hypothalamus. A de novo balanced translocation between chromosomes 1p22.1 and 6q16.2, which disrupts SIM1 (73), and missense mutations in SIM1 cause severe obesity and a variable phenotype of developmental delay (74). Heterozygous Sim1-null mice are hyperphagic and obese and have increased linear growth (75); several lines of evidence suggest that SIM1 may lie downstream of MC4R signaling in the paraventricular nucleus (76, 77). The transcriptional targets of SIM1 are unknown, but one potential target is the neuropeptide oxytocin. Oxytocin mRNA levels are reduced in line with Sim1 gene dosage in mouse models of Sim1 deficiency. The hyperphagia of Sim1-haploinsufficient animals is ameliorated by oxytocin administration and accentuated by the administration of oxytocin receptor antagonists (78).
Bardet-Biedl syndrome (BBS) is an autosomal recessive disease characterized by learning difficulties, polydactyly, retinal dystrophy, hypogonadism, renal abnormalities, and obesity. BBS is genetically heterogeneous, with mutations in more than 14 genes identified to date (79). Many of these genes appear to affect proteins localized to the basal body, a key element of the monocilium thought to be important for intercellular sensing in mammalian cells including neurons (80). Other disorders of ciliary function (e.g., Alström syndrome and Carpenter syndrome) can also lead to obesity (81).
Recent studies have suggested a connection between ciliary function and leptin signaling (82). Conditional postnatal knockout of proteins involved in intraflagellar transport in mice results in hyperphagia and obesity (83). This phenotype is recapitulated when the loss of cilia is limited to neurons and when it is specifically targeted to POMC neurons (83).The role of cilia in key neuronal populations involved in energy homeostasis will be the subject of intense future research.
Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) is a clinical syndrome of hypotonia, mental retardation, short stature, hypogonadism, hyperphagia, and obesity caused by lack of expression of genes on chromosome 15q11–13, which are imprinted such that they are only expressed on the paternally inherited copy of the chromosome. These transcripts include SNURF-SNRPN and multiple small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs), in particular the HBII-85 snoRNAs (84, 85). Further investigation is required to determine how the loss of these noncoding sequences could lead to the range of phenotypes associated with PWS. High serum ghrelin concentrations (86, 87) and loss of oxytocin-producing neurons in the brains of patients (88) suggest these hormones and neuropeptides may be important in this disorder.
Albright hereditary osteodystrophy (AHO) is an autosomal dominant disorder resulting from germline mutations in GNAS1 that decrease expression or function of Gsα protein. Maternal transmission of GNAS1 mutations leads to AHO (characterized by short stature, obesity, skeletal defects, and impaired olfaction) plus resistance to several hormones (e.g., parathyroid hormone) that activate Gs in their target tissues; paternal transmission leads only to the AHO phenotype (89). Mice lacking maternally derived Gsα are obese, and similar to MC4R-deficient mice, they have reduced sympathetic tone but are not hyperphagic (90). Gsα-independent signaling appears to mediate the effect of melanocortins on food intake, whereas Gsα-dependent signaling mediates the effect of melanocortins on sympathetic tone and energy expenditure.
Copy number variants (CNVs), which include gains (duplications or insertions), losses (deletions), and rearrangements, have been estimated to account for nearly 18% of the heritable variance in gene expression. We and others have identified several rare CNVs recurrent among severely obese patients and enriched relative to controls (91, 92). Deletion of a 220-kb segment of 16p11.2 is associated with highly penetrant familial severe early-onset obesity and severe insulin resistance (91). This deletion includes a small number of genes, one of which is SH2B1, known to be involved in leptin and insulin signaling (91). These patients gain weight in the first years of life, with hyperphagia and fasting plasma insulin levels that are disproportionately elevated compared to age- and obesity-matched controls. This phenotype resembles the severe obesity and insulin resistance seen in mice with targeted deletion of Sh2b1 (93).
By genotyping on average 350,000–500,000 SNPs covering more than 75% of the genome, genome-wide association studies (GWASs) conducted in population-based cohorts assessed for body mass index or in case-control designs for obesity have led to the identification of several interesting genetic loci. These studies are based on the premise that the heritability of common diseases is made up of a large number of common disease-causing variants, which exceed a minor allele frequency (MAF) of 5%. The first loci detected were variants in the FTO (fat mass and obesity associated) gene (94, 95) and variants approximately 200 kb downstream of MC4R (96). Altogether, more than 20 genetic loci relevant for body weight regulation have been identified by GWAS approaches (97).
It is important to recognize that GWASs identify associations between diseases and regions of the genome, not specific genes. Many of the signals identified map to noncoding regions of the genome, and the interpretation of signals relies heavily on the current annotation of the regions implicated. Genes within the region of interest are evaluated as potential candidates for causing the association, but the association may also conceivably arise due to long-range genetic interactions or other as yet poorly understood genetic phenomena. Not surprisingly, understanding the biological basis of these association signals is still at an early stage. The strongest association with BMI in individuals of mixed European descent has consistently been found with SNPs in the first intron of FTO. Homozygotes for the risk allele of the most common SNP in FTO are 3–4 kg heavier than those without the risk allele and have a 1.67-fold increased risk of obesity (94). Several human studies have demonstrated an association between SNPs in FTO and energy intake (98, 99) rather than energy expenditure. FTO is expressed in the hypothalamus, and its expression is nutritionally regulated (100, 101). Fto-null mice are small with increased energy expenditure (102) whereas mice overexpressing Fto are obese (103). FTO has been shown to be a dioxygenase with the ability to demethylate 3-methylthymine in DNA in vitro (100), but the relevance of this observation to its in vivo function remains to be seen.
The common variants uncovered in GWASs are characterized by modest effect sizes (per-allele odds ratios between 1.2 and 1.5), and the proportion of variability explained by GWAS-identified loci to date remains relatively modest (<10%). There is the possibility that the heritability of obesity-related phenotypes may have been overestimated, as the effects of the shared environment and, in the case of twins, the shared in utero environment, are difficult to separate from inherited influences. Nonetheless, several approaches are being used to explain the missing genetic heritability.
There is a growing consensus in the study of common complex diseases that the common disease–common variant hypothesis is not going to explain the missing heritability. In obesity, common variants influencing susceptibility to common obesity and more highly penetrant rare variants at the same loci, including CNVs, associated with severe early-onset forms of the disease have already been demonstrated (e.g., MC4R, SH2B1, BDNF) (96, 104, 105). The state of the art technique for finding low-frequency/rare genetic variants relies on next-generation sequencing technologies to undertake whole exome sequencing, in which tens of thousands of coding variants are identified per individual (106). Not every variant will be identified due to variable depth of coverage, misalignment of reads, and the inherent complexity of repetitive regions of the genome. Those that are identified must be carefully refined to identify potentially pathogenic variants. Functional data, as well as predictions of the impact of variants on protein function, can also be incorporated into the filtering process. While statistical and computational methods are continually emerging to address these challenges, as with other hypothesis-free genetic approaches the technique is ultimately only as powerful as the genetic material being interrogated. Initial methodological approaches have tended toward sequencing related individuals (107), or sequencing individuals at opposing extremes of the phenotypic spectrum (108). To date, virtually all research into finding genes related to obesity has focused on the upper end of the body mass index distribution. Evolutionary models, animal models, and analogies with other disease areas all suggest that searching for genes influencing body weight may be profitably pursued by studying very thin, healthy individuals. Thinness appears to be a trait that is as stable and heritable as obesity (109). The successful application of this technology to well-characterized patient groups has the potential to transform gene discovery in human metabolic disease.
This technology has already been used for genetic diagnosis and to identify novel proteins disrupted in Mendelian disease (110), but its application in complex diseases such as obesity is likely to be even more challenging. Understanding the pathogenic potential of individual mutations in the context of variation at other loci that may act as modifiers will hinge on the development of physiologically relevant assays in cell or animal systems to tease apart the biological causality of variants.
Although it is difficult to distinguish between purely environmental effects and interactions between the environment and epigenetic factors, genome-wide measurement of epigenetic variation has recently been made possible using techniques such as DNA methylation–specific microarrays. In primates, exposure of mothers to a high-fat diet in pregnancy has major implications for the development of metabolic disease in the offspring (111). The implications of these findings for human obesity remain unclear at present, although in a recent study a number of variably methylated regions that differed among individuals but were stable over time were found to correlate with BMI (112).
Given the increasing availability of next-generation sequencing technologies, it is very likely that new genes, proteins, and mechanisms will emerge within the next 10 years. Translating basic discoveries into advances in clinical practice remains a key long-term challenge.
The Obesity Review Series is supported in part by unrestricted educational grants from Merck & Co. and the Life Sciences Institute of the University of Michigan.
Address correspondence to: I. Sadaf Farooqi, University of Cambridge Metabolic Research Laboratories, Institute of Metabolic Science, Box 289, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom. Phone: 44.1223.762.634; Fax: 44.1223.762.657; E-mail: isf20@cam.ac.uk.
Conflict of interest: The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.
Reference information: J Clin Invest. 2011;121(6):2080–2086. doi:10.1172/JCI46044.
Dynamics of insulin secretion and the clinical implications for obesity and diabetesSusumu Seino et al.
Adipose tissue remodeling and obesityKai Sun et al.
Sixteen years and counting: an update on leptin in energy balanceLaurent Gautron et al.
Circadian rhythms, sleep, and metabolismWenyu Huang et al.
Genetic approaches to understanding human obesityShwetha Ramachandrappa et al.
The role of lipid droplets in metabolic disease in rodents and humansAndrew S. Greenberg et al.
Inflammatory links between obesity and metabolic diseaseCarey N. Lumeng et al.
Gut microbiome, obesity, and metabolic dysfunctionHerbert Tilg et al.
Digging deeper into obesityRexford S. Ahima